[sage-devel] sage, gentoo-prefix lmonade was: log messages

2012-02-20 Thread Burcin Erocal
Hi Keshav, thanks for pointing out this thread. log messages is an interesting title to discuss the future directions for Sage. :) I added gentoo-science to the CC list, since that is the most likely location for sage-on-gentoo discussion and the gentoo-developers might be interested in the

Re: [sage-devel] sage, gentoo-prefix lmonade was: log messages

2012-02-20 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote: Hi Keshav, thanks for pointing out this thread. log messages is an interesting title to discuss the future directions for Sage. :) I added gentoo-science to the CC list, since that is the most likely location for

Re: [sage-devel] sage, gentoo-prefix lmonade was: log messages

2012-02-20 Thread François Bissey
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:33:27 Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote: Hi Keshav, thanks for pointing out this thread. log messages is an interesting title to discuss the future directions for Sage. :) I added gentoo-science to the

Re: [sage-devel] sage, gentoo-prefix lmonade was: log messages

2012-02-20 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:39 PM, François Bissey francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote: On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:33:27 Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote: Hi Keshav, thanks for pointing out this thread. log messages is an

Re: [sage-devel] sage, gentoo-prefix lmonade was: log messages

2012-02-20 Thread Benjamin Jones
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:39 PM, François Bissey francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote: snip There are efforts to parallelize the building of the doc and I would say that if it gets merged we may very well put the doc back into sage and just build it. We could keep fetching pre-built doc for

Re: [sage-devel] sage, gentoo-prefix lmonade was: log messages

2012-02-20 Thread François Bissey
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:43:29 Benjamin Jones wrote: On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:39 PM, François Bissey francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote: snip There are efforts to parallelize the building of the doc and I would say that if it gets merged we may very well put the doc back into sage and

Re: [sage-devel] sage, gentoo-prefix lmonade was: log messages

2012-02-20 Thread John H Palmieri
On Monday, February 20, 2012 2:43:29 PM UTC-8, Benjamin Jones wrote: On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:39 PM, François Bissey wrote: snip There are efforts to parallelize the building of the doc and I would say that if it gets merged we may very well put the doc back into sage and just build

Re: [sage-devel] sage, gentoo-prefix lmonade was: log messages

2012-02-20 Thread François Bissey
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:13:33 John H Palmieri wrote: On Monday, February 20, 2012 2:43:29 PM UTC-8, Benjamin Jones wrote: On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:39 PM, François Bissey wrote: snip There are efforts to parallelize the building of the doc and I would say that if it gets

Re: [sage-devel] sage, gentoo-prefix lmonade was: log messages

2012-02-20 Thread Benjamin Jones
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 5:13 PM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday, February 20, 2012 2:43:29 PM UTC-8, Benjamin Jones wrote: On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:39 PM, François Bissey wrote: snip There are efforts to parallelize the building of the doc and I would say that