Re: [sage-devel] Re: bug in graph isomorphism in sage-4.7

2011-07-23 Thread Robert Miller
Vincent, Thanks Robert for pointing this. But is the following the expected behavior ? Of course not, that is clearly wrong. I've tracked down the bug, and posted a patch at: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11620 This should fix the problem. ... However, when running doctests I

Re: [sage-devel] Re: bug in graph isomorphism in sage-4.7

2011-07-14 Thread Robert Miller
See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10549 On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Maarten Derickx m.derickx.stud...@gmail.com wrote: Spending about an hour on debugging I got really close to the source of the problem. The main problem is that DiGraph (and probably Graph also but I did

Re: [sage-devel] Re: bug in graph isomorphism in sage-4.7

2011-07-14 Thread Robert Miller
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote: See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10549 ... and its dependencies. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: bug in graph isomorphism in sage-4.7

2011-07-08 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2011-07-08 15:15, Vincent D wrote: Actually, the problem is even worst... the function relabel does not do the right job! The graph G2 obtained as above has two loops at the vertex 4. Well, to what does to vertex 4 get mapped to under your permutation? -- To post to this group, send an