This error seems to be due to the python install that you're using.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: which python
/usr/local/bin/python
It seems to get past this step if you do:
/usr/bin/python /home/yqiang/planet/planet.py
/home/yqiang/planetsage/fancy/config.ini
the python interpreter at /usr/bin/python i
This seems to be similar to SDL (which has a python wrapper: pygame).
I am worried about yet another "multimedia framework". We should have
less of those instead of more.
Michel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
Hi guys,
I am writing a library for polynomial arithmetic which I might
eventually like to see included in Sage. (It is not presently part of
FLINT, but maybe one day it will be.)
I would like to release it simultaneously under GPL v2 and GPL v3. I
specifically do not want to use the claus
On Dec 11, 2007 6:18 AM, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I am writing a library for polynomial arithmetic which I might
> eventually like to see included in Sage. (It is not presently part of
> FLINT, but maybe one day it will be.)
>
> I would like to release it simultaneo
On Dec 11, 2007 9:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This seems to be similar to SDL (which has a python wrapper: pygame).
> I am worried about yet another "multimedia framework". We should have
> less of those instead of more.
I think you can just do 2D things easily in pyga
-- Forwarded message --
From: Karl Fogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Dec 11, 2007 1:44 AM
Subject: Re: having authors names in .py files
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I saw your mail about putting author names in source files, in this
thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/brow
On Dec 11, 2007 5:20 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2007 9:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > This seems to be similar to SDL (which has a python wrapper: pygame).
> > I am worried about yet another "multimedia framework". We should have
> > less
Hi,
I've noticed a very recent regression -- it worked 2 months ago.
sage: t=var('t')
sage: f=t*cos(0)
sage: float(f(1))
1.0
sage: f=t*sin(0)
sage: float(f(1))
Traceback...
: float() argument must be a string or a number
--
Joel
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to
On Dec 11, 5:15 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Karl Fogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Dec 11, 2007 1:44 AM
> Subject: Re: having authors names in .py files
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I saw your mail about putting author names in
On Dec 11, 2007 8:39 AM, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed a very recent regression -- it worked 2 months ago.
>
> sage: t=var('t')
> sage: f=t*cos(0)
> sage: float(f(1))
> 1.0
> sage: f=t*sin(0)
> sage: float(f(1))
> Traceback...
> : float() argument must be a str
By the way, this is now
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1460
On Dec 11, 2007 8:53 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2007 8:39 AM, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've noticed a very recent regression -- it worked 2 months ago.
> >
I would like to propose that the next Bug Day is held on Friday, Dec.
14th. 2007. That is the day after the planned release date for 2.9.
Procedure, timing and so on as always.
Thoughts?
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to
On Dec 11, 7:10 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> I would like to propose that the next Bug Day is held on Friday, Dec.
> 14th. 2007. That is the day after the planned release date for 2.9.
>
Sorry: To be clear: I mean *Friday*
> Procedure, timing and so on as always.
>
> T
Hi,
there is an inconsistency problem with subs:
sage: e = x**2 + 1
sage: e
x^2 + 1
sage: e.subs(x= x**2)
x^4 + 1
sage: e.subs(x**2= x)
File "", line 1
: keyword can't be an expression
(, line 1)
sage: e.subs(x**2, x)
-
On Dec 11, 2007 5:53 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 11, 2007 8:39 AM, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've noticed a very recent regression -- it worked 2 months ago.
> >
> > sage: t=var('t')
> > sage: f=t*cos(0)
> > sage: float(f(1))
> > 1.0
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 07:28:24PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> there is an inconsistency problem with subs:
>
> sage: e = x**2 + 1
> sage: e
> x^2 + 1
> sage: e.subs(x= x**2)
> x^4 + 1
> sage: e.subs(x**2= x)
>
>File "
-- Forwarded message --
From: Selim Tuncel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Dec 11, 2007 10:37 AM
Subject: SAGE
To: William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
William,
The story about SAGE is now on the UW main page:
http://www.washington.edu/
Selim
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of
> First I cannot reproduce it on 2.8.14 (so it's probably only a bug in
> 2.8.15?):
>
> $ ./sage
> --
> | SAGE Version 2.8.14, Release Date: 2007-11-24 |
> | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for inf
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2007 5:20 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Dec 11, 2007 9:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> This seems to be similar to SDL (which has a python wrapper: pygame).
>>> I am worried about yet another "multimedia framework". We
Hey,
I just tried to install the optional polymake package on a fresh
2.8.15 installation, and it looks like the cddlib094b spkg has been
renamed to cddlib094b.p0.spkg, so polymake can't find it. I could fix
that manually on my system, but I think the polymake installation
needs a tweak. I can
On Dec 11, 8:56 pm, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
>
Hey Marshall,
> I just tried to install the optional polymake package on a fresh
> 2.8.15 installation, and it looks like the cddlib094b spkg has been
> renamed to cddlib094b.p0.spkg, so polymake can't find it. I could fix
> tha
On Dec 11, 2007 10:58 AM, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 07:28:24PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > there is an inconsistency problem with subs:
> >
> > sage: e = x**2 + 1
> > sage: e
> > x^2 + 1
> > sage: e.subs(x= x**2)
> > x^4 + 1
> > sag
On Dec 11, 2007, at 8:53 AM, William Stein wrote:
> One possible solution would be to call simplify before
> doing float(...) -- but that could greatly slow symbolic calculus
> down in some cases.
This could be attempted only on failure, which wouldn't have a
performance impact in most cases.
On Dec 11, 2007 8:18 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
> > On Dec 11, 2007 5:20 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Dec 11, 2007 9:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> This seems to be similar to SDL (which has a python wrap
On Dec 11, 2007 12:17 PM, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 11, 2007, at 8:53 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> > One possible solution would be to call simplify before
> > doing float(...) -- but that could greatly slow symbolic calculus
> > down in some cases.
>
> This could be at
Hi,
> > How do you know that I didn't want to view f more like g? What if I
> > simplify g
> > or do something else that rewrites g in some equivalent form that doesn't
> > show
> > the x^2 quite so obviously.
> >
> > I think this might be able to be carefully defined from a computational
> >
No offense! I have no strong feelings on this issue.
But I am always worried when I see a new 1.0 open source project. It
seems people
prefer to start from scratch rather than enhancing an existing mature
project.
I see that python-opengl now uses ctypes as well. So it should work on
any distribu
On Dec 11, 2007 9:48 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 11, 2007 12:17 PM, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 11, 2007, at 8:53 AM, William Stein wrote:
> >
> > > One possible solution would be to call simplify before
> > > doing float(...) -- but that c
On Dec 11, 2007 9:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No offense! I have no strong feelings on this issue.
> But I am always worried when I see a new 1.0 open source project. It
> seems people
> prefer to start from scratch rather than enhancing an existing mature
> project.
A
OK, its now ticket #1463. The required changes are minimal; the spkg-
install should have:
SAGE_GMP_VERSION="4.2.1.p12"
CDDLIB_VERSION="094b.p0"
Cheers,
Marshall
On Dec 11, 2:01 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Dec 11, 8:56 pm, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
Hi,
Is it possible to automatically login the VMware appliance as "sage"?
I've discovered that my army of machines running Sage under VMware get
tired out after running for a long time--I guess that this arises from
a combination of effects coming from running under Windows in the
first place (!
Hey John,
I don't have the virtual machine installed, but if you google for
"automatic login linux", you will find a couple solutions. It seems
that
modifying /etc/inittab is the best way to go and there is a tutorial here:
http://easymamecab.mameworld.net/html/autologin.htm
Let me know if that
> On Dec 11, 2007 3:08 PM, John Voight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > Is it possible to automatically login the VMware appliance as "sage"?
You may have other reasons for wanting to have someone logged in
automatically and I don't use the VMs mysef, so perhaps I am
suggesting something
On Dec 11, 2007 2:56 PM, pgdoyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Questions:
>
> 1. Can I prevent wrapping in output cells of the notebook? With
> wrapping, matrix displays are often indecipherable. If I switch to
> text view, I can see the output fine, because there is no wrapping,
> instead a
On Dec 11, 2007 8:39 AM, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed a very recent regression -- it worked 2 months ago.
>
> sage: t=var('t')
> sage: f=t*cos(0)
> sage: float(f(1))
> 1.0
> sage: f=t*sin(0)
> sage: float(f(1))
> Traceback...
> : float() argument must be a str
Hi,
Another article on sage, which is just a summary of the press release...
http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7009426590
I also made the "In the News" link at the top of sagemath.org point
to http://wiki.sagemath.org/SAGE_in_the_News
which David Joyner setup, and put the above article t
On Dec 11, 2007 2:34 PM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK, its now ticket #1463. The required changes are minimal; the spkg-
> install should have:
>
> SAGE_GMP_VERSION="4.2.1.p12"
> CDDLIB_VERSION="094b.p0"
>
> Cheers,
> Marshall
I incorporated your fixes into the package. Please tr
Recently scratching and itching because of trying Williams pyglet
example and having it blow up on Ubuntu 7.10, I implemented the
suggestion at #975 and posted a patch. The patch fixes the following:
sage: !external-command
to launch an external command.
However, I can't figure out how to s
On Dec 11, 2007 1:14 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 11, 2007 9:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > No offense! I have no strong feelings on this issue.
> > But I am always worried when I see a new 1.0 open source project. It
> > seems people
> > pre
Thanks Bobby, I'll try to set up planet.sagemath.org when finals are over :)
In the mean time, anyone (William?) care to write a introductory blog
article that we can feature when it's all up and running? You do not
have to wait for planetsage to be running to do this!
Cheers,
Yi
http://yiqiang
William Stein wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2007 1:14 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Dec 11, 2007 9:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> No offense! I have no strong feelings on this issue.
>>> But I am always worried when I see a new 1.0 open source project. It
>>> se
Hi,
Check out this Russian article about Sage, whose title translates
to "Sage package on the best scientific and open source":
http://rnd.cnews.ru/math/news/line/index_science.shtml?2007/12/10/278779
.
Carl Witty points out that they actually give a reasonable list of
what Sage can do and do
Fernando wrote:
> I certainly wasn't trying to dissuade Ted from 'scratching his itch',
> I hope it didn't come across that way. Rather my suggestion was for
> what *I* see as possibly better tools to scratch said itch. I
> actually happen to *really* like Ted's idea of a local client that is
>
43 matches
Mail list logo
