Hi,
I don't think that the trac 1460 is really fixed. The bug just got moved
around.
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1460
# sage 2.9
sage: t=var('t')
sage: f=t*sin(0)
sage: float(f(1))
# goes boom for a different reason than in 2.8.15
It seems the originally submitted patch by was
2.9.1 is due out on Saturday. I'd like to start with the following
tickets:
- Possibly fixed or invalid:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/678
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1144
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1476
- Easy, should be done:
On Dec 17, 5:04 pm, Robert Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2.9.1 is due out on Saturday. I'd like to start with the following
tickets:
- Possibly fixed or
On Dec 17, 2007 5:32 AM, Joel B. Mohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I don't think that the trac 1460 is really fixed. The bug just got moved
around.
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1460
# sage 2.9
sage: t=var('t')
sage: f=t*sin(0)
sage: float(f(1))
# goes boom for a
Justin (cc: sage-devel),
There are now a lot of people using Sage on OSX who don't know
(much) about the command line, but who are maple/mathematica
users. When they try:
sage: mathematica('2+2')
they get a big error message about creating a math script, etc.,
and similarly for Maple.
It
Hi,
I need help making sage-vmware-2.9.zip. Could somebody with high
bandwidth, vmware,
and an account on sage.math do the following:
(1) immediately respond to this email volunteering, so only one
person does this
(2) Download sage-vmware-2.9.zip in
You are NOT wrong, your are right!
I used to have a lot of problems from students when Maple simplified
2(x+y) to 2 (at least it used to).
John
On 17/12/2007, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007 5:32 AM, Joel B. Mohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I don't think
Hi, all,
On Dec 17, 2007, at 08:48 , William Stein wrote:
There are now a lot of people using Sage on OSX who don't know
(much) about the command line, but who are maple/mathematica
users. When they try:
sage: mathematica('2+2')
they get a big error message about creating a math
On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:19 AM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
Hi, all,
On Dec 17, 2007, at 08:48 , William Stein wrote:
There are now a lot of people using Sage on OSX who don't know
(much) about the command line, but who are maple/mathematica
users. When they try:
sage: mathematica('2+2')
On Dec 17, 2007 10:19 AM, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, all,
On Dec 17, 2007, at 08:48 , William Stein wrote:
There are now a lot of people using Sage on OSX who don't know
(much) about the command line, but who are maple/mathematica
users. When they try:
sage:
On Dec 17, 2007 1:27 PM, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IIRC, It's an .app, but inside the .app folder there's a executable
file maple that one can invoke from the command line works as one
would expect. On OS X one can use spotlight (also accessible from the
shell) to locate such
On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Stephen Forrest wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007 1:27 PM, Robert Bradshaw
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IIRC, It's an .app, but inside the .app folder there's a executable
file maple that one can invoke from the command line works as one
would expect. On OS X one can use
On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:52 , Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Stephen Forrest wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007 1:27 PM, Robert Bradshaw
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IIRC, It's an .app, but inside the .app folder there's a executable
file maple that one can invoke from the command
I seem to remember that Maple has a function unapply which when
applied to a symbolic expression with one variable, returns a callable
function, e.g. unapply(t*cos(0)) would return a callable function t -
t*cos(0). I cannot remember if it could handle symbolic expressions
with more than one
On Monday 17 December 2007 11:41, William Stein wrote:
This is *not* a bug. The is by design. Since f has no variables it
is no longer
implicitly callable:
Sorry for the double reply. Perhaps I should be very explicit about why I
think the current state is very error-prone (and hence,
- William
(Sent from my iPhone.)
Begin forwarded message:
From: bill purvis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: December 17, 2007 3:05:25 PM MST
To: sage-newbie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [sage-newbie] Integer points on Elliptic Curves
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone have any useful sage code
*
WMI 2.1
*
The developer team of *WMI2 http://matek.hu/* is happy to announce their
continuously developed e-Learning software which reached the milestone
version 2.1. This new version is capable to provide about 70 selected
symbolic and numerical operations from a wide range of areas of
On Dec 17, 2007 2:00 PM, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Well, sort of good news.
For Maple, you have to know about '10', or assume that 'current' (cf.
William's earlier msg) points to the one you want to run [probably a
reasonable assumption].
'Current' is actually a
On Dec 17, 2007 12:13 PM, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed that Mercurial 0.9.5 has a record extension that mimics the
darcs record functionality of interactively asking what changes you want
to commit out of a file. I know there was discussion of this a while ago.
Reference:
Hi everyone,
I frequently want to get column vectors, and vector([2, 3]).transpose
() is not implemented. One then thinks of matrix(vector([2,
3])).transpose(), but matrix() is a little rigid. Looking at vector,
there is a protocol that calls _vector_() if possible; I would like
that to
Ack, I'm an idiot. The functionality is there in matrix(), I just
need to add _matrix_ to the vector classes. Will do that instead :)
BTW, the matrix() documentation is not right -- it doesn't say this.
Nick
On Dec 17, 8:30 pm, Nick Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
I
21 matches
Mail list logo
