[sage-devel] Docbuild: Unable to fetch knots/environment.pickle

I try to work on #19435, which has nothing to do with knot theory. What I got is [reference] history_and_license: 0 todos, 1 index, 0 citations, 0 modules [reference] homology: 1 todos, 19 index, 32 citations, 18 modules [reference] interfaces: 2 todos, 46 index, 2 citations, 45 modules

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Linux on Windows

On the theme of hell freezing over, this also happened: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/vcblog/2016/03/30/visual-c-for-linux-development/ On 31 March 2016 at 02:17, 'Bill Hart' via sage-devel < sage-devel@googlegroups.com> wrote: > It's almost a year since I predicted Microsoft would do

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Linux on Windows

On Thursday, March 31, 2016 at 9:23:56 AM UTC+2, bluescarni wrote: > > On the theme of hell freezing over, this also happened: > > https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/vcblog/2016/03/30/visual-c-for-linux-development/ > Though that is less surprising since they released Linux remote debugging (gdb

Re: [sage-devel] Docbuild: Unable to fetch knots/environment.pickle

On 2016-03-31 08:13, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: [reference] WARNING: Unable to fetch /home/jm58660/sage/local/share/doc/sage/doctrees/en/reference/knots/environment.pickle This is http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20321 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[sage-devel] fplll upgrade review

Hi there, anybody up for reviewing http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20291 which upgrades fplll to the current upstream master. This enables to install fpylll[1] in Sage, which is a much nicer Python interface for lattice-reduction than what Sage currently has (optional package in

Re: [sage-devel] Pythonics

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote: > Hi, all, > > I have couple of questions regarding "attributes" in Python/Sage: > > 1. If hasattr(X, "foo") returns True, does that mean that "X.foo" should not > blow up? What's the definition of "blow up"? I think

Re: [sage-devel] Pythonics

On 31.03.2016 23:08, Justin C. Walker wrote: Hi, all, I have couple of questions regarding "attributes" in Python/Sage: 1. If hasattr(X, "foo") returns True, does that mean that "X.foo" should not blow up? this means X.foo is defined. 2. Is there a way to tell, when hasattr(X, "foo")

Re: [sage-devel] Pythonics

On 31/03/16 18:22, Johannes wrote: On 31.03.2016 23:08, Justin C. Walker wrote: 2. Is there a way to tell, when hasattr(X, "foo") returns True, whether "X.foo" can be called? X.foo and x.foo.__call__ is None !? The only way to go here is if callable(X.foo): print "X.foo is callable"

[sage-devel] Pythonics

Hi, all, I have couple of questions regarding "attributes" in Python/Sage: 1. If hasattr(X, "foo") returns True, does that mean that "X.foo" should not blow up? 2. Is there a way to tell, when hasattr(X, "foo") returns True, whether "X.foo" can be called? 3. If "X.foo" is callable, is it

Re: [sage-devel] matrix rational_form

Hi William, Thanks for the reply. I see that decomposition probably does give info that I could use to get the transition matrix. I'll think about it. Victor PS. How massive is your iPhone 6 plus :-)? On Thursday, March 31, 2016 at 11:48:49 AM UTC-4, William wrote: > > > > On Thursday,

[sage-devel] memory leak with SR equality test

See the report at http://ask.sagemath.org/question/32920/memory-saturation-when-i-test-equalities-in-symbolic-ring/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email

Re: [sage-devel] matrix rational_form

On Thursday, March 31, 2016, VictorMiller wrote: > The method rational_form for matrices just returns the class > representative of the conjugacy class of a matrix by other rational > matrices. A similar function PrimaryRationalForm in magma returns 3 things > -- the

[sage-devel] matrix rational_form

The method rational_form for matrices just returns the class representative of the conjugacy class of a matrix by other rational matrices. A similar function PrimaryRationalForm in magma returns 3 things -- the class representative, a rational matrix which, when conjugated by the input, gives

[sage-devel] Re: online documentation and "long time"

I created ticket 20339 for that, and fixed it. (needs review if you wish) El martes, 22 de marzo de 2016, 9:49:29 (UTC+1), Samuel Lelievre escribió: > > The page > > http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/plotting/sage/plot/plot.html > > has this: > > Pi Axis > > sage: g1 =

Re: [sage-devel] Pythonics

On Mar 31, 2016, at 14:17 , William Stein wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote: >> Hi, all, >> >> I have couple of questions regarding "attributes" in Python/Sage: >> >> 1. If hasattr(X, "foo") returns True, does that mean that "X.foo" should not

Re: [sage-devel] Pythonics

On Mar 31, 2016, at 16:15 , David Roe wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote: > >> >> On Mar 31, 2016, at 15:37 , Vincent Delecroix wrote: >> >>> On 31/03/16 18:22, Johannes wrote: On 31.03.2016 23:08, Justin C. Walker wrote: > 2. Is there a

Re: [sage-devel] Pythonics

On Mar 31, 2016, at 15:37 , Vincent Delecroix wrote: > On 31/03/16 18:22, Johannes wrote: >> On 31.03.2016 23:08, Justin C. Walker wrote: >>> 2. Is there a way to tell, when hasattr(X, "foo") returns True, >>> whether "X.foo" can be called? >> >> X.foo and x.foo.__call__ is None > > !? > >

Re: [sage-devel] Pythonics

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote: > > On Mar 31, 2016, at 15:37 , Vincent Delecroix wrote: > > > On 31/03/16 18:22, Johannes wrote: > >> On 31.03.2016 23:08, Justin C. Walker wrote: > >>> 2. Is there a way to tell, when hasattr(X, "foo") returns True, > >>>

[sage-devel] citing Sage: the SageMath version

I noticed that the Wiki entry on citing Sage https://wiki.sagemath.org/Publications_using_SAGE does not reflect the rebranding of Sage as SageMath. How should the citation change? --Ursula. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To

[sage-devel] Re: online documentation and "long time"

I remember that a few of the plots just didn't work (and I didn't find a work around) so I dropped them . I will look into it and my notes and get back with either a trac ticket or more information on this. El martes, 22 de marzo de 2016, 10:53:42 (UTC+1), Eric Gourgoulhon escribió: > > > > Le

[sage-devel] Re: online documentation and "long time"

As far as I know there is only a switch to "all" plots. ¿Should we append the "long time" comment to the sphinx_plot command, in case somebody decides to implement such a swithc later? El martes, 22 de marzo de 2016, 11:24:26 (UTC+1), Dima Pasechnik escribió: > > > > On Tuesday, March 22, 2016

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage 7.1 Windows 8.1 Cygwin make error

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Tuesday, March 29, 2016 at 6:49:27 PM UTC+1, Witold Żarowski wrote: >> >> Thanks. I could theoretically do it, if I only knew >> 1) where to get the Cygwin package for mpfr from and > > > probably you need this

[sage-devel] More cryptography-related functionality for mq.SBox : #20336 (needs review)

Hi, Is there anyone who is willing to review ticket #20336 ? It is an implementation for some functionality to determine various cryptographic properties of an S-Box such as nonlinearity, differential uniformity, linear structures, etc. Best Regards, --