Re: [sage-devel] Re: Trac again...

2016-07-08 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 11:21:22 AM UTC+1, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > What is wrong with https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20980 ? > > The branch field is red, but I think I did nothing unusual. > > > red branch is meant to indicate

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Trac again...

2016-07-08 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 1:30:09 PM UTC+1, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > for some reason trac is already on 7.3.beta7 (and with it the automerge > fails) > > Now beta7 is released, but the branch is still red. > well, have you hand-merged and

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Trac again...

2016-07-08 Thread Jori Mäntysalo
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, Dima Pasechnik wrote: for some reason trac is already on 7.3.beta7 (and with it the automerge fails) Now beta7 is released, but the branch is still red. And I was not able to push another patch: STDERR: error: failed to push some refs to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage fails to build on (fresh install of) debian linux 8.4 (64 bit)...

2016-07-08 Thread Joseph Hundley
I would guess that this means I *do* have the Cremona database (?). JH sage: db = CremonaDatabase() sage: On Friday, July 1, 2016 at 9:30:24 AM UTC-4, Johan S. R. Nielsen wrote: > > Are you having the same problem as me: > >

[sage-devel] Re: Trac again...

2016-07-08 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 9:39:59 AM UTC+1, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: > > What is wrong with https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20980 ? > > The branch field is red, but I think I did nothing unusual. red branch is meant to indicate that the automatic merge fails. (i.e. your branch was based off an

Re: [sage-devel] Trac again...

2016-07-08 Thread Erik Bray
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: > What is wrong with https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20980 ? > > The branch field is red, but I think I did nothing unusual. Also I got an > error message about mails not sent when setting it to needs_review. Try

Re: [sage-devel] Trac again...

2016-07-08 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 10:01:29 AM UTC+1, Erik Bray wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Jori Mäntysalo > wrote: > > What is wrong with https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20980 ? > > > > The branch field is red, but I think I did nothing unusual. Also I got >

[sage-devel] Re: Trac again...

2016-07-08 Thread Dima Pasechnik
this branch is still red there... On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 10:00:05 AM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Friday, July 8, 2016 at 9:39:59 AM UTC+1, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: >> >> What is wrong with https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20980 ? >> >> The branch field is red, but I think I did

Re: [sage-devel] Doc-testing ouptut with dots

2016-07-08 Thread Erik Bray
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Andrew wrote: > Hi! > > How do you doc-test output that starts with ...? The particular output that > I want to test is: > > sage: print(CartanType(['A', oo]).ascii_art()) > ...---O---O---O---O---O---O---O---... > -3 -2 -1 0 1

[sage-devel] Trac again...

2016-07-08 Thread Jori Mäntysalo
What is wrong with https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20980 ? The branch field is red, but I think I did nothing unusual. Also I got an error message about mails not sent when setting it to needs_review. -- Jori Mäntysalo

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Trac again...

2016-07-08 Thread Jori Mäntysalo
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, Dima Pasechnik wrote: What is wrong with https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20980 ? The branch field is red, but I think I did nothing unusual. red branch is meant to indicate that the automatic merge fails. (i.e. your branch was based off an older version of