Hi Jeroen,
On 2016-08-18, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2016-08-18 11:22, Simon King wrote:
>> What are you talking about? The current optional Sage package "meataxe"
>> is the latest upstream from Aachen.
>
> I was under the impression that you needed special patches and
Hi Dima,
On 2016-08-18, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Anyway, I guess it depends upon how much GAP code you have. If its hundreds
> of lines it's probably nicer to put them into a file.
It is about 1500 lines, currently in three files.
Cheers,
Simon
--
You received this message
Recently, in ipython5.0 branch of
https://github.com/stakemori/sage-shell-mode, I implemented functions for
some of ANSI sequences.
(sage-shell-mode handles only ^[[nA, ^[[nB, ^[[nC, ^[[nD, ^[[nH and ^[[nJ)
It is not stable enough yet, but it works. I think a similar fix also works
for
On 2016-08-19 04:16, James Khan wrote:
Hi!
Many thanks for your message and kind help.
I am running virtual machine on windows 7 and the sage 7.3 link is not
ready yet (the source code is there but not the sage-7.3.ova) so I am
stuck with 7.2 for the time being :(
I have indeed tried ./sage -i
Hi!
Many thanks for your message and kind help.
I am running virtual machine on windows 7 and the sage 7.3 link is not
ready yet (the source code is there but not the sage-7.3.ova) so I am stuck
with 7.2 for the time being :(
I have indeed tried ./sage -i TOPCOM versus "-i topcom" and then also
On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 5:32:09 AM UTC-7, Bill Page wrote:
>
> I think that there was no claim that it was unambiguous and therefore
> it implies that some ambiguity would be tolerated. But this has
> already been argued ad infinitum and apparently that has resulted in
> the current
Hi!
Thanks for pointing this out. I am having the same problems!
I have the most recent version of SAGE (7.2)
and I have tried all the combinations suggested in this thread: TOPCOM,
topcom, download the bz2 and plaving in /upstream/ but still no luck. I
wonder why this is the case.
I get the
Hi Jeroen,
On 2016-08-18, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2016-08-18 00:02, Simon King wrote:
>> Slightly elaborating on my suggestion: Split the code from the old-style
>> p_group_cohomology-2.1.6.spkg into four parts, namely
>> 1. an optional package "meataxe", which
now building...
Am Mittwoch, 17. August 2016 20:38:12 UTC+2 schrieb Volker Braun:
>
> I made https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21269
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 at 10:04:47 AM UTC+2, Martin R wrote:
>>
>> While working on the new fricas interface, I noticed that the
>> method __repr__
On 2016-08-18 00:02, Simon King wrote:
Slightly elaborating on my suggestion: Split the code from the old-style
p_group_cohomology-2.1.6.spkg into four parts, namely
1. an optional package "meataxe", which provides a C library and some
executables and which is *not* a Python package. It is
Since solving this appears to be tricky, is there a way to undo the
ipython-5 thing? (I'd like to keep other things from sage 7.4...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 7:37:28 AM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2016-08-18 00:02, Simon King wrote:
> > Slightly elaborating on my suggestion: Split the code from the old-style
> > p_group_cohomology-2.1.6.spkg into four parts, namely
> > 1. an optional package "meataxe", which
James Khan wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thanks for pointing this out. I am having the same problems!
>
> I have the most recent version of SAGE (7.2)
FWIW, the most recent version is Sage 7.3, released a couple of days ago.
There have been changes also to the topcom package IIRC, although the
error you
Hi Dima,
On 2016-08-18, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> Does a concept of "GAP packages" and "Singular packages" exist? If so,
>> you should follow recommendations for those kinds of packages to install
>> your GAP/Singular code.
>
> With GAP it is problematic, as updating GAP
PS: It would be easy enough to expose the simple-prompt either to the sage
command line or have a special sage-embedded commandline entrypoint that
starts witout any ANSI sequences.
On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 1:32:18 PM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> IMHO this is an intentional upstream
IMHO this is an intentional upstream change and not a bug. So we'll have to
either go with it or fork our own IPython. And I don't want to maintain an
IPython fork.
On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 11:08:41 AM UTC+2, Martin R wrote:
>
> Since solving this appears to be tricky, is there a way to
Am Donnerstag, 18. August 2016 13:33:41 UTC+2 schrieb Volker Braun:
>
> PS: It would be easy enough to expose the simple-prompt either to the sage
> command line or have a special sage-embedded commandline entrypoint that
> starts witout any ANSI sequences.
>
> I have absolutely no idea how to
On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 12:59:39 PM UTC+1, Simon King wrote:
>
> Hi Dima,
>
> On 2016-08-18, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >> Does a concept of "GAP packages" and "Singular packages" exist? If so,
> >> you should follow recommendations for those kinds of packages to
>
On 2016-08-18 11:22, Simon King wrote:
What are you talking about? The current optional Sage package "meataxe"
is the latest upstream from Aachen.
I was under the impression that you needed special patches and that "the
latest upstream from Aachen" did not work for you. Anyway, it doesn't
On 18 August 2016 at 01:59, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 at 3:25:31 PM UTC-7, Bill Page wrote:
>>
>>
>> It turns out that a solution is now "hidden away" in plain sight:
>>
>> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18640
>>
>>
Hi!
Thanks a lot for getting back promptly! Sorry it's an old post; I was just
getting desperate and was googling. :) Would you think updating to SAGE 7.3
would help?
I don't why TOPCOM is not loading. I am running a windows version, maybe
that's a problem?
thanks!!
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at
James Khan wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thanks a lot for getting back promptly! Sorry it's an old post; I was
> just getting desperate and was googling. :) Would you think updating to
> SAGE 7.3 would help?
I guess it will, at least give better error messages... ;-)
> I don't why TOPCOM is not loading. I
ExpressionNice is a subclass of sage.symbolic.expression.Expression,
it seemed therefore that maybe I should be able to do something like:
sage: import sage.manifolds.utilities
sage: sage.symbolic.expression.Expression =
sage.manifolds.utilities.ExpressionNice
and expect all my expressions to be
On 2016-08-18 16:43, Simon King wrote:
What do you mean by Singular interface?
If I understand correctly, your package has an interface for GAP,
Singular and Sage and these are all independent from eachother. I am
asking that, if somebody has Singular installed but not GAP and not
Sage,
When I have a Sage notebook in the browser, as I scroll up or down I
frequently see the following error on the console:
[1:1:0818/131348:ERROR:PlatformKeyboardEvent.cpp(117)] Not implemented
reached in static blink::PlatformEvent::Modifiers
Hi Jeroen,
On 2016-08-18, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2016-08-18 16:43, Simon King wrote:
>> What do you mean by Singular interface?
>
> If I understand correctly, your package has an interface for GAP,
> Singular and Sage and these are all independent from eachother.
In
Thats a chrome bug thats already fixed upstream...
On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 9:01:04 PM UTC+2, cir...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> When I have a Sage notebook in the browser, as I scroll up or down I
> frequently see the following error on the console:
>
>
27 matches
Mail list logo