Re: [sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

Unfortunately, didn't work correctly. Running SAGE_INSTALL_GCC=yes make seems to do something wrong to gmp. e.g., while building GMP-ECM... checking if gmp.h version and libgmp version are the same... (6.1.0/5.1.3) no configure: error: 'gmp.h' and 'libgmp' have different versions, you have to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 1:02:53 AM UTC, John H Palmieri wrote: > > I'm having this problem with "git trac checkout 21592", for example. > > A question: how do I identify which version of git-trac is installed? Is > the version actually recorded anywhere in the source code? > there is

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

jb12407@lmfdb5:~$ lscpu Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s):32-bit, 64-bit Byte Order:Little Endian CPU(s):64 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-63 Thread(s) per core:2 Core(s) per socket:8 Socket(s): 4 NUMA node(s): 8 Vendor ID:

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 12:40:23 AM UTC, Jonathan Bober wrote: > > Is git still down, or do is the problem just that I don't know what I am > doing? > > jb12407@lmfdb5:/data/local/sage/sage-7.3$ git trac checkout 21596 > Make sure you have the latest `git trac` installed. There is no

[sage-devel] openblas segfault?

I'm getting a segfault on the current development branch of sage (see below). Is this a known issue and/or effecting anyone else? This does not happen for me in Sage 7.3, although it does happen if I try to go "back in time" with a 'git checkout 7.3' and then rebuild. So just to be certain I

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: surely one can mess everything up with env. vars :-) > Yes, of course, I should have been more specific. I mean 'standard' environment variables (which users like me might use in wrong or 'hackish' ways). e.g., something

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

I'm having this problem with "git trac checkout 21592", for example. A question: how do I identify which version of git-trac is installed? Is the version actually recorded anywhere in the source code? John On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 5:54:54 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

That's a good point. It looks like 5.1.0. I will try rebuilding from scratch with SAGE_INSTALL_GCC=yes, since that's easier than actually trying to figure out what's going on. (Also, it is past time for me to update gcc, since it looks like I can easily have 6.1.0 on this system.) I will report

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 6:18:53 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 1:02:53 AM UTC, John H Palmieri wrote: >> >> I'm having this problem with "git trac checkout 21592", for example. >> >> A question: how do I identify which version of git-trac is

[sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 9:33:42 PM UTC, Jonathan Bober wrote: > > I'm getting a segfault on the current development branch of sage (see > below). Is this a known issue and/or effecting anyone else? > > This does not happen for me in Sage 7.3, although it does happen if I try > to go

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

Is git still down, or do is the problem just that I don't know what I am doing? jb12407@lmfdb5:/data/local/sage/sage-7.3$ git trac checkout 21596 Loading ticket #21596... Newly created local branch: t/21596/matrix_charpoly_algorithm__flint___destroys_the_polynomial_ring_generator Traceback (most

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 12:06:44 AM UTC, Jonathan Bober wrote: > > Unfortunately, didn't work correctly. Running > > SAGE_INSTALL_GCC=yes make > > seems to do something wrong to gmp. e.g., while building GMP-ECM... > > checking if gmp.h version and libgmp version are the same...

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 1:54 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 12:40:23 AM UTC, Jonathan Bober wrote: >> >> Is git still down, or do is the problem just that I don't know what I am >> doing? >> >> jb12407@lmfdb5:/data/local/sage/sage-7.3$ git

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

I recompiled with gcc 6.1.0, and get the same segfault. I did a ./sage -i gdb to get a better crash report, which is attached. I don't know if it is useful. Also, it mentions some gcc 5.1.0 paths, which seems odd. I don't know if that indicates that something is broken on my end. On Mon, Sep 26,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

Most probably gcc version used to build Sage is also quite important... On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 10:16:23 PM UTC, Jonathan Bober wrote: > > jb12407@lmfdb5:~$ lscpu > Architecture: x86_64 > CPU op-mode(s):32-bit, 64-bit > Byte Order:Little Endian > CPU(s):

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 10:48:51 PM UTC, Jonathan Bober wrote: > > That's a good point. It looks like 5.1.0. I will try rebuilding from > scratch with SAGE_INSTALL_GCC=yes, since that's easier than actually trying > to figure out what's going on. > it might well be that 5.1 cannot

[sage-devel] trac not responding

I almost cannot use either web interface, or git server. (however I can ssh to the host, although it is slow...) I see a lot of apache activity... Does anyone do anything heavy? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > I almost cannot use either web interface, or git server. > (however I can ssh to the host, although it is slow...) > I see a lot of apache activity... > > Does anyone do anything heavy? I doubt this is good:

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

The buildbot is offline, too... http://build.sagedev.org There shouldn't be a connection but its certainly an odd coincidence On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 5:22:19 PM UTC+2, William wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Dima Pasechnik > wrote: > > > > I almost