FYI, pandoc installs and runs on all the platforms that sage supports.
But surf does not.
in this sense dependence on pandoc is OK,
dependence on surf - much less so.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group
On Mar 11, 2017, at 01:32 , Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Speaking of optional packages, we should also think of a strategy to deal
> with optional packages which have dependencies which are not part of Sage.
>
> For example, the optional rst2ipynb package requires pandoc, which is not in
> Sage.
>
On Wednesday, March 1, 2017 at 2:11:41 AM UTC-8, Peleg Michaeli wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have two questions, one might be thought of as a bug report / feature
> request, please tell me what you think. Trying
> integrate(x, x, 0, infinity)
> raises ValueError: Integral is divergent.
>
> My first
One other possibility for symbolic systems when the question when
the object in question cannot be simplified or evaluated, is to return
the unsimplified or unevaluated expression.
The simplest case might be something like
is (a>b) which, in the absence of any information
about the values of
Speaking of optional packages, we should also think of a strategy to
deal with optional packages which have dependencies which are not part
of Sage.
For example, the optional rst2ipynb package requires pandoc, which is
not in Sage.
On the other hand, in #22378 I wanted to package surf as
I noticed that, too. We should just remove it. I doesn't just break our own
python3, it also is a major pain if you want to use gdb to debug stuff
(which embeds python3 nowadays).
On Saturday, March 11, 2017 at 1:28:52 AM UTC+1, vdelecroix wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> The installation of both
I opened
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22581
On 11/03/2017 08:52, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Saturday, March 11, 2017 at 12:18:22 AM UTC, vdelecroix wrote:
On 11/03/2017 00:53, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Friday, March 10, 2017 at 6:28:18 PM UTC, vdelecroix wrote:
Hi,
Running the
