Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

2017-06-14 Thread Nathan Dunfield
> > How do people get VMs for testing different OSX / XCode versions? > Both VirtualBox and VMWare (Fusion) fully support OS X VMs with the important caveat you have to use actual Apple hardware for the host. I've used both without major problems on a Mac Pro. Currently I mostly use VMWare

[sage-devel] FYI Giac: compiling latex to computer algebra-enabled HTML5

2017-06-14 Thread parisse
https://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~parisse/giac/castex.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to

[sage-devel] Is it reasoanble to have SR.var() inject an assumption into assumptions()?

2017-06-14 Thread Stan
As mentioned in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23138, the assume() command takes a lot of time, which is very annoying when defining a lot of variables using var() including a domain information. var('x', domain='real') passes the domain information to ginac and adds it as an assumption to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

2017-06-14 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 10:00:05 AM UTC+1, Erik Bray wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Isuru Fernando > wrote: > > Here's a branch for osx with sage 7.6. > > https://github.com/isuruf/sagelib-feedstock/tree/osx3 > > Unfortunately travis-ci timeouts due to

[sage-devel] patchbot server is off today

2017-06-14 Thread Frédéric Chapoton
Due to maintenance of our infrastructure, the patchbot server is not available today. This will impact all trac pages (trying to load the patchbot icons). And of course, the patchbot clients will not be able to send their reports to the patchbot server. This should come back at 19 (French

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Conda package for Sage

2017-06-14 Thread Erik Bray
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Isuru Fernando wrote: > Here's a branch for osx with sage 7.6. > https://github.com/isuruf/sagelib-feedstock/tree/osx3 > Unfortunately travis-ci timeouts due to the build time restrictions. > conda-forge's policy has been to do it locally and

Re: [sage-devel] get_systems() is totally unreliable without profiling enabled in Cython

2017-06-14 Thread Erik Bray
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2017-06-06 16:11, Erik Bray wrote: >> >> such as providing a way to manually list systems/libraries used >> by a specific function > > > That's not the problem. The problem is how to determine which functions are >

Re: [sage-devel] get_systems() is totally unreliable without profiling enabled in Cython

2017-06-14 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2017-06-14 11:07, Erik Bray wrote: I guess I don't really understand what it's for then. What's your proposed user interface? Currently, it is for example sage: get_systems("(x^2 - 1).expand()") to get the list of "systems" involved in the execution of the Sage command (x^2 -

Re: [sage-devel] get_systems() is totally unreliable without profiling enabled in Cython

2017-06-14 Thread Erik Bray
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2017-06-14 11:07, Erik Bray wrote: >> >> I guess I don't really understand what it's for then. > > > What's your proposed user interface? I don't understand your question. How do you figure I'm proposing a

Re: [sage-devel] get_systems() is totally unreliable without profiling enabled in Cython

2017-06-14 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2017-06-14 12:36, Erik Bray wrote: The fact that you put "systems" in quotes I think really gets to what my question is: How is "systems" defined in this case? Essentially, a "system" is any external math package/library that a computation uses. So things like Pynac, MPFR, PARI, Maxima,