Thanks. For me, it's a bit better, but could still be improved. For
example, looking at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/3810/3810-ncalexan-abelian-group-iter.patch
there are blocks of code which are either ? pink or ? blue, e.g. old
lines 791-793 on top of new lines
Build report 1: on the 64-bit machine
Linux version 2.6.18.8-0.3-default ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)) #1 SMP Tue Apr 17 08:42:35
UTC 2007
I have three all-new failures:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/sage0.py
sage -t
Build report 2: on the 32-bit machine
Linux version 2.6.24-19-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.2.3
(Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)) #1 SMP Wed Aug 20 22:56:21 UTC 2008
i had these failures.
sage -t devel/sage/sage/stats/hmm/chmm.pyx
sage -t devel/sage/sage/stats/hmm/hmm.pyx
On Aug 31, 7:44 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John,
Build report 1: on the 64-bit machine
Linux version 2.6.18.8-0.3-default ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)) #1 SMP Tue Apr 17 08:42:35
UTC 2007
I have three all-new failures:
Thanks for that... someone might care to fix it... I think it used to
work. It calls sage -python passing all the command line.
More importantly what would be involved in using the system framework
based python - would it just be a case of setting $PYTHON to be /usr/
bin/python?
Cheers,
Simon
2008/8/31 mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Aug 31, 7:44 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John,
Build report 1: on the 64-bit machine
Linux version 2.6.18.8-0.3-default ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)) #1 SMP Tue Apr 17 08:42:35
UTC 2007
2008/8/31 mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Aug 31, 10:03 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John,
Build report 2: on the 32-bit machine
Linux version 2.6.24-19-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.2.3
(Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)) #1 SMP Wed Aug 20 22:56:21 UTC 2008
i had
Built fine on amd64 hardy heron but the test for benchmark.py failed.
Do you want me to post it? It was similar to the output John posted.
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 6:28 AM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
Doc Day 3 went well and we barely missed the goal of 60% coverage with
On Aug 31, 3:33 pm, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Built fine on amd64 hardy heron but the test for benchmark.py failed.
Do you want me to post it? It was similar to the output John posted.
Hi David,
I don't think we will need it. The Maple issue is now #4025 and I will
post a patch
On Aug 30, 2:12 am, Philippe Saade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
** real need of tutorials and ready to use worksheet with well
documented used case.
Hi, I've started to write down some ideas about more sage
documentations here:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/DocumentationProject
It's not finished, but
This is on a slightly different wiki, but I could convert it if there
is any value in that:
http://openwetware.org/wiki/Open_writing_projects/Sage_and_cython_a_brief_introduction
...otherwise maybe just a link would make sense. I've learned cython
a little better since writing it but I don't
On Sunday 31 August 2008, John Cremona wrote:
2008/8/31 mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Aug 31, 10:03 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John,
Build report 2: on the 32-bit machine
Linux version 2.6.24-19-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.2.3
(Ubuntu
Hi,
as it turned out about 6 people contributed doctest patches while a
number of other people dropped by and did some other work. So in total
I would call it a success, especially since we reached 59.9% coverage
and with some of the patches posted, but not reviewed in time for
3.1.2 we will
On Aug 31, 4:33 pm, Martin Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sunday 31 August 2008, John Cremona wrote:
SNIP
Hi there, that means that I screwed up 32-bit compatibility. I'll look into it
tomorrow.
This is now #4027.
Note that on OSX in addition the following happens too:
Hi,
this is a followup to the above thread. Mike Hansen wrote a doctest
for gp.py and we hit the following problem:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/gp.py
**
File /Users/mabshoff/sage-3.1.2.alpha3/tmp/gp.py, line 522:
Hello Bill,
There is very a little documentation available in Sage about how the
conversion from Sage internal format to some external format (such as
used when calling Axiom). This happens automatically when you write
something like
sage: axiom(x^2+1)
without including the 'quotes'.
mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
Doc Day 3 went well and we barely missed the goal of 60% coverage with
59.9%. Tomorrow we will merge a couple more patches from the que and
will surpass the August 2008 goal. Aside from the doctesting code
merged a couple of long standing open ticket like the
On Aug 31, 8:57 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
Doc Day 3 went well and we barely missed the goal of 60% coverage with
59.9%. Tomorrow we will merge a couple more patches from the que and
will surpass the August 2008 goal. Aside from the doctesting
mabshoff wrote:
On Aug 31, 8:57 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
Doc Day 3 went well and we barely missed the goal of 60% coverage with
59.9%. Tomorrow we will merge a couple more patches from the que and
will surpass the August 2008 goal. Aside from
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 1:15 AM, mhampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is on a slightly different wiki, but I could convert it if there
is any value in that:
http://openwetware.org/wiki/Open_writing_projects/Sage_and_cython_a_brief_introduction
...otherwise maybe just a link would make
20 matches
Mail list logo
