Hi,
The categorification of the crystal code is almost done in
patch trac_8911_categorification_crystals-as.patch .
There are just a few question I have:
* In line 605 and 625 of /categories/crystals.py, how
can I access the method of the category for testing rather
than the one by the class
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 03:43:29PM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
As a followup to the design discussion for parents with multiple
realizations at Sage Days 20.5, I wrote last Saturday a draft of
infrastructure for those.
...
Another note, in particular for Adrien: I worked hard the week
Hi Bruce,
I would like to take a class, say for example Graph, and work with
formal R-linear combinations of Graphs.
The FormalSum only applies to numbers and the examples for
CombinatorialFreeModule only have finite sets.
This is not True:
sage: CombinatorialFreeModule(QQ,
Dear Sage-Combinat devs,
As a followup to the design discussion for parents with multiple
realizations at Sage Days 20.5, I wrote last Saturday a draft of
infrastructure for those. See on the Sage-Combinat patch server:
trac_7980-multiple-realizations-nt.patch
The patch
Thanks Florent. That's helpful.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-combinat-devel group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-de...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Hi!
I finished the use of the category framework for crystals. It is
available both on trac and the sage-combinat server. Here is
the description on trac:
--
Trac # 8911: Use category framework for crystal code
New crystal
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.comwrote:
On 05/10/2010 01:27 PM, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
Hi,
The latest sagenb package is included in Sage 4.4.1
(sagenb-0.8.p0.spkg). Then, extract and install it, then develop as usual.
$ tar -xvf sagenb-0.8.p0.splg
On Monday, May 10, 2010, Roman Pearce rpear...@gmail.com wrote:
For what it's worth, PowerPC is totally obsolete and there were not
that many 32-bit only Intel Macs shipped before they switched to the
Core2. I think you would do fine supporting only 64-bit x86 on 10.5
and 10.6. That should
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.netwrote:
Has the version of ECL been updated recently?
I insist that this is not a regression, it is just a misinterpretation on
our side of how mkstemp() should work (adding characters other than letters
seems stupid but
I have the honor of owning a CoreDuo MacMini, and iBook G4, and a
Core2Duo
MacBook Pro. All of these machines are in good health and produce very
adequate
performance. That said, to keep Sage current on all three machines I
need
OS10.4 32bit PowerPC G4, OS10.6 32bit CoreDuo, and OS10.6 64bit
Hi David,
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
SNIP
As a short temp hack, I've set up a cron job to clear out /tmp/ECL* every
two hours (midnight, 2am, 4am etc). This can't guarantee a build, but I
think it is the only short term option.
Thank you
Hi
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 09:55:02AM -0700, Rob Beezer wrote:
Sounds like Dan Drake has a simple test working on a clean 10.04
install (thanks, Dan!), so that is good news, I believe. If you want
to test your setup, in the notebook, try something simple like just
var('x y')
Minh Nguyen schrieb:
Hi folks,
As reported on sage-devel [1], Sage 4.4.2.alpha0 mostly has the
following doctest failures:
* 32- vs. 64-bit issue in matrix/matrix1.pyx --- this is tracked at
ticket #8944 [2] and a patch is awaiting review.
* doctest failures in misc/sagedoc.py --- this can be
On 11 May 2010 05:14, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Is anyone interested, or has some time to spare, to review various
tickets for the upcoming rc release of Sage 4.4.2 or the final
release? The following are necessary for any upcoming release of Sage
4.4.2, whether it
While preparing a linear algebra class with sage, i found that the
functions related to eigenvectors, eigenspaces and eigenvalues are not
function of the endomorphism objects (which would be the
mathematically correct deffinition), but of the matrix objects.
Wouldn't it make sense to add these
On Tuesday, May 11, 2010, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote:
While preparing a linear algebra class with sage, i found that the
functions related to eigenvectors, eigenspaces and eigenvalues are not
function of the endomorphism objects (which would be the
mathematically correct deffinition), but
On 05/11/2010 01:45 AM, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com mailto:jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 05/10/2010 01:27 PM, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
Hi,
The latest sagenb package is included in Sage 4.4.1
On May 11, 11:22 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 05/11/2010 01:45 AM, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com mailto:jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 05/10/2010 01:27 PM, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
On May 11, 2010, at 10:56 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 11, 11:22 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 05/11/2010 01:45 AM, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com
On May 11, 1:53 pm, Roman Pearce rpear...@gmail.com wrote:
For what it's worth, PowerPC is totally obsolete and there were not
that many 32-bit only Intel Macs shipped before they switched to the
Core2. I think you would do fine supporting only 64-bit x86 on 10.5
and 10.6. That should cover
There is a pynac hg repo in the pynac spkg.
Which is not unpacked by default in a source distribution, and which
(presumably) would require someone to make an spkg and sage -f it each
time, though I may just be ignorant of an easier way to do that. But
sage -b wouldn't do it, correct?
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 11, 1:53 pm, Roman Pearce rpear...@gmail.com wrote:
For what it's worth, PowerPC is totally obsolete and there were not
that many 32-bit only Intel Macs shipped before they switched to the
Core2. I think you
2.) Having done this (or even not), shall we deliver the Mac OS X
binary distributions in one and the same directory, i.e. discard the
distinction (see E above) between intel and powerpc binary
directories? (This would imply that we should add some mechanism(s) in
the Sage binaries to
This might be opening a can of worms, but...
Currently the callable symbolic ring (i.e., what we get when we do
something like f(x)=x^2) blissfully ignores the infrastructure in Sage
for defining maps. Instead, (to the best of my knowledge) callable
symbolic elements are just simple sugar
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
f(x)=x^2 (SR -- SR)
f(x,y,z)=x*y (SR^3 -- SR)
f(x,y,z)=[x*y,y+z] (SR^3 -- SR^2)
using the category framework?
What would you want to do once you have those maps?
--Mike
--
To post to this group, send an
Hello, all!
After running
random_matrix(GF(2), 2, 1)
I always get the same matrix, [[1][1]].
Also, the following code
freq = {}
for _ in range(1000):
M = random_matrix(GF(2), 2, 2)
M.set_immutable()
if M not in freq:
freq[M] = 1
else:
freq[M] += 1
show(freq)
2010/5/11 Jan Groenewald j...@aims.ac.za:
Hi
Hi,
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 09:55:02AM -0700, Rob Beezer wrote:
Sounds like Dan Drake has a simple test working on a clean 10.04
install (thanks, Dan!), so that is good news, I believe. If you want
to test your setup, in the notebook, try
On 05/11/10 07:56 AM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net mailto:david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Has the version of ECL been updated recently?
I insist that this is not a regression, it is just a misinterpretation
on our
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 05/11/10 07:56 AM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net mailto:david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Has the version of ECL been updated
On 05/11/2010 03:20 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
f(x)=x^2 (SR -- SR)
f(x,y,z)=x*y (SR^3 -- SR)
f(x,y,z)=[x*y,y+z] (SR^3 -- SR^2)
using the category framework?
What would you want to do once you have those maps?
Hi folks,
I have wrapped up a t2.math binary of Sage 4.4.2.alpha0. You can find it at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-4.4.2.alpha0/sage-4.4.2.alpha0-t2.math.tar.gz
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
As a note,
MatrixSpace(GF(2), nrows, ncols).random_element()
works as expected.
Regards,
Roberto.
On May 11, 5:39 pm, Roberto Nóbrega rwnobr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, all!
After running
random_matrix(GF(2), 2, 1)
I always get the same matrix, [[1][1]].
Also, the following code
Dear mailing list,
I was wondering if there is any interest in a Sage package to compute
with differential forms. Right now, I have the rudiments of a
differential form class with the obvious operations (wedge product,
exterior differential, Hodge star, ...) but I want to take this
somewhat
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:18 PM, jvkersch joris.vankerscha...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear mailing list,
I was wondering if there is any interest in a Sage package to compute
with differential forms. Right now, I have the rudiments of a
differential form class with the obvious operations (wedge
On 05/11/2010 04:18 PM, jvkersch wrote:
Dear mailing list,
I was wondering if there is any interest in a Sage package to compute
with differential forms. Right now, I have the rudiments of a
differential form class with the obvious operations (wedge product,
exterior differential, Hodge star,
Is anyone interested in learning how to do an MPIR release? No
experience required!
I've just committed some changes to MPIR to fix the extended GCD
normalisation in MPIR for Sage and Pari and this is enough for a mini
MPIR 2.0.1 release.
I can teach you how to do it, step-by-step from tuning,
Hi Bill,
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is anyone interested in learning how to do an MPIR release?
Yes, I'm *very* interested in learning how to manage an MPIR release.
I can teach you how to do it, step-by-step from tuning, to making a
Excellent! Thanks Minh.
Below if a VERY rough first draft of the procedure. I'll fill each
step in with more detail as the release proceeds. Probably best to
coordinate this via email and perhaps we'll make an html page on the
MPIR website detailing all the steps so that anyone can do this by
Hi Bill,
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Excellent! Thanks Minh.
Below if a VERY rough first draft of the procedure. I'll fill each
step in with more detail as the release proceeds.
Thank you for detailing the release procedure.
Probably best
Hello Everybody
I was working on a function is_perfect, which tests whether a given graph is
perfect. This function has the bad idea to compute the complement of a
graph.
Writing the docstrings, I wrote that Bipartite Graphs are obviously perfect,
which is perfectly true.
Here is what happens
Some years ago I started writing a z-transform routine for Maxima,
based on the following work for REDUCE:
http://www.zib.de/Symbolik/reduce/moredocs/ztrans.pdf
I'd be happy to rewrite it for Sage, except that I don't know how to
implement rule-based programs. Can anybody provide me with a
Maybe the problem is that somewhere in the depths of is_perfect, a
BipartiteGraph is being created without the intention to use it that
way. Perhaps it is in self.complement(), or some other function that
is implicitly assuming to use the current class to make a copy, when
it should be making a
Maybe the problem is that somewhere in the depths of is_perfect, a
BipartiteGraph is being created without the intention to use it that
way. Perhaps it is in self.complement(), or some other function that
is implicitly assuming to use the current class to make a copy, when
it should be making
Nonon, it is just that if you now type g.complement() on a Bipartite
Graph in Sage, you will raise an exception ! My function fails only
when I call it on a bipartite Graph !
I guess my point is that a graph should be a BipartiteGraph when it
makes sense. It certainly seems right to me to have
jvkersch joris.vankerscha...@gmail.com writes:
Last but not least, I noticed that there was some discussion on this
mailing list on adding support for differential forms and exterior
algebra using FriCAS and/or Reduce.
In case you are interested in using FriCAS to extend Sage, I'd be glad
45 matches
Mail list logo
