Hi,
I was wondering... So, I have my local install of Sage 7.1 from source. I
> didn't get the source using git, I downloaded it from the website. I've
> made a local repository for Sage on my computer, and also made a remote
> repository for it on my github. However, I don't think it is
Please see http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20461
Comments welcome.
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 1:02 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Hi,
> Matthias Koeppe did a lot of work on MILPs recently, in particular on
> copying LPs, see e.g.
> http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20414
> and the
>
>
> var('x')
> R=LaurentPolynomialRing(QQ,'x')
> R(1+1/x)
>
>
That is the interface that makes sense to me. That is, enable conversion.
So, would it make sense to enable it by a `convert_method_name` ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> So, what is the proper way to do it? As I wrote, it's not really an
>> option to solve the whole problem for each new constraint...
>>
>
> add a constraint, and solve again?
>
> Yes, and then? I don't think I can remove it again, can I? As I wrote,
pseudo-code is as follows, and keep in
On Thursday, May 12, 2016 at 4:16:07 PM UTC+1, Martin R wrote:
>
> So, what is the proper way to do it? As I wrote, it's not really an
> option to solve the whole problem for each new constraint...
>
add a constraint, and solve again?
Dima
>
> Martin
>
--
You received this message
So, what is the proper way to do it? As I wrote, it's not really an option
to solve the whole problem for each new constraint...
Martin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
On Thursday, May 12, 2016 at 4:56:54 AM UTC-7, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:48 AM mmarco
> wrote:
>
>> But even if we implement expression.laurent_polynomial(), it wouldn't
>> automatically allow conversion from SR to LaurentPolynomialRing, would it?
>>
On 2016-05-12 15:32, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
Hi,
The point is that you are not able anymore to use variables from other
problems.
For good reasons obviously...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group
Hi,
The point is that you are not able anymore to use variables from other
problems. Namely "assignment" is a variable from "p" not "p_new".
Vincent
On 12/05/16 02:18, 'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote:
Hi there!
I am having a severe problem with a program of mine that stopped working,
very
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:48 AM mmarco wrote:
> But even if we implement expression.laurent_polynomial(), it wouldn't
> automatically allow conversion from SR to LaurentPolynomialRing, would it?
>
Right, it's conversion on demand.
--
You received this message because you
Many warning messages are currently being issued every time the
offending code is being run, instead of only the first time:
sage: C = codes.RandomLinearCode(4, 2, GF(2))
sage: C.decode(C.ambient_space().random_element())
/home/jsrn/local/sage/sage-6.3/src/bin/sage-ipython:1:
Sorry for the stupid question - I did not realize that some old sources are
to be found among the new sources :)
Denis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
Thanks for the suggestions, I will try to do that. In the meantime, I tried
7.1 on a machine with 100G of RAM. Now it works, but it costs me 4.3 G of
RAM the first time round - that is the same calculation which used 1G in
7.0. Re-running it a few times with or without clobbering BIG - I am
But even if we implement expression.laurent_polynomial(), it wouldn't
automatically allow conversion from SR to LaurentPolynomialRing, would it?
We would need to populate the conversion list somehow.
El jueves, 12 de mayo de 2016, 5:33:50 (UTC+2), Ralf Stephan escribió:
>
> Then making it
Hi,
Matthias Koeppe did a lot of work on MILPs recently, in particular on
copying LPs, see e.g.
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20414
and the meta-ticket http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20302
Not sure whether he reads this, I cc to him.
I presume you got one of these updates messing up your code.
The developer guide has a lot of material about git:
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/index.html
On Thursday, May 12, 2016 at 7:06:36 AM UTC+2, saad khalid wrote:
>
> Hey guys:
>
> I was wondering... So, I have my local install of Sage 7.1 from source. I
> didn't get the source using
Hi there!
I am having a severe problem with a program of mine that stopped working,
very likely after upgrading to 7.2.beta5, but I'm afraid I don't know from
which version. (I believe something after 7.1)
The error I get is:
ValueError: Variable MIPVariable of dimension 1 is a variable from
17 matches
Mail list logo