Re: [sage-devel] Re: Checking out old branches

2016-11-18 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:39 AM, David Roe wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 8:12:32 AM UTC+1, David Roe wrote: >>> >>> Create a new git trac subcommand to replace `git trac checkout 1234`, say >>> `git trac old 1234`. This wou

[sage-devel] NTL 10.3.0

2016-11-18 Thread Victor Shoup
Go to http://shoup.net/ntl for full details. Below is the latest entry in the change log. I've also updated the NTL/FLINT comparison document: http://shoup.net/ntl/benchmarks.pdf The only significant change is to the ZZ_pX factoring benchmarks (the new code in NTL speeds up mat_ZZ_p multiplication

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Hermite normal form of matrix over polynomial ring

2016-11-18 Thread Vincent Neiger
Le vendredi 18 novembre 2016 04:44:49 UTC+1, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : > I am not a big fan of the suggested asymptotically best algorithms relying > on auxiliary tools, which would be hard to implement and gain for small > matrices might be not much. > For sure; I do not know precisely what the th

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Checking out old branches

2016-11-18 Thread Clemens Heuberger
On 2016-11-18 10:05, David Roe wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 3:49 AM, Volker Braun > wrote: > > The .git dir doesn't have to be in the working tree: > > git --git-dir= --work-tree= > > But I think its very confusing to have another working tree

Re: [sage-devel] Re: What is the correct way to patch packages that use autotools?

2016-11-18 Thread Erik Bray
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 5:27:15 PM UTC+1, Erik Bray wrote: >> >> Hmm, okay. I am using my system's autoreconf. For the sage autotools >> is that just an optional package I need to install? > > Yes. This turned out to be l

[sage-devel] Re: Checking out old branches

2016-11-18 Thread David Roe
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 3:49 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > The .git dir doesn't have to be in the working tree: > > git --git-dir= --work-tree= > > But I think its very confusing to have another working tree inside the > working tree, thats rather confusing and error prone. E.g. what does "git > comm

[sage-devel] Re: Checking out old branches

2016-11-18 Thread Volker Braun
The .git dir doesn't have to be in the working tree: git --git-dir= --work-tree= But I think its very confusing to have another working tree inside the working tree, thats rather confusing and error prone. E.g. what does "git commit" do in that situation? IMHO its conceptually much easier to ju

[sage-devel] Re: Checking out old branches

2016-11-18 Thread David Roe
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 8:12:32 AM UTC+1, David Roe wrote: >> >> Create a new git trac subcommand to replace `git trac checkout 1234`, say >> `git trac old 1234`. This would fetch the branch, check it out into a >> completely separat