On Sunday, 4 March 2018 19:12:14 UTC-7, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
>
> On the first run of Sage, it is supposed to create some folders in .sage
> What I observe is that R directory is created only on the second run (and
> Sage fails to start if by then .sage is made immutable). Looking at
>
Hello,
On the first run of Sage, it is supposed to create some folders in .sage
What I observe is that R directory is created only on the second run (and
Sage fails to start if by then .sage is made immutable). Looking at
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/blob/master/src/bin/sage-env I fail to
On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 10:58:32 AM UTC, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
>
>
> I'm also -1 for this, after the argument given by Travis on the ticket:
> injecting silently names in the global namespace may override names already
> defined by the user. Initially, I naively thought this was a good way
You're right, I have found where I call sage/ext/interrupt.pxi and changed
it and now it works.
The compiler gave no information on where is the problem. It's a little bit
annoying...
Le dimanche 4 mars 2018 00:41:45 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
>
>
> On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 5:19:37 PM
With my aproach there is no need of an extra apache server. The jupyterhub
server takes care of that.
I guess that my patch would conflict with the standard use (without
jupyterhub). So in order to include it in the main branch we would need a
way to distinguish if we are running through
After distclean, it's now compiling.
Thanks,
David.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this
Hi Vincent,
Le dimanche 4 mars 2018 11:35:04 UTC+1, vdelecroix a écrit :
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> I agree with Kwankyu and Simon:
> - the global namespace is already bloated
> - abbreviations should be avoided in most places in Sage
>
>
Thanks for your feedback.
> And having the namespace modified
Hi Simon,
Le dimanche 4 mars 2018 08:25:09 UTC+1, Simon King a écrit :
>
>
>
> What's wrong with v.div(), to cope with standard notation in SageMath?
>
>
Nothing from my point of view: I also prefer object-oriented notations over
functional ones and v.div() is already implemented in the ticket
>
> An alternative (disapproved by the reviewer) is to inject these names in
>> the global namespace only if any pseudo-Riemannian manifold is constructed,
>> by means of the function sage.repl.user_globals.set_global in
>> PseudoRiemannianManifold.__init__, see line 398 of
>> this source
Hi Eric,
I agree with Kwankyu and Simon:
- the global namespace is already bloated
- abbreviations should be avoided in most places in Sage
And having the namespace modified at the time an object is created is by
far the worst solution.
The following two alternatives would be fine
1) using
10 matches
Mail list logo
