> > I guess FiniteDimensionalAlgebrasWithBasis has both the old Algebras()
> > and the new MagmaticAlgebras() as supercategories? That would explain
> > why I'm seeing associativity and rings everywhere.
> >
>
> ...and building up a pile of non-associative categories one-at-a-time
> doesn't
You can try the conda package.
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/blob/develop/src/doc/en/installation/conda.rst
Isuru
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
Thank you.
It looks like the problem has been solved in sage-8.8, unfortunably the
binary is not available for macOS 10.11.6 but only for macOS 10.14.5.
And I tried to install binaries of sage-8.5, sage-8.6 and sage-8.7 for
macOS 10.11.6 and nothing works on my computer (with 8.6 I have the same
On Monday, August 12, 2019 at 5:42:30 AM UTC-7, E. Madison Bray wrote:
Although it was designed primarily with astronomy applications in
> mind, the core format is domain-agnostic. It would be really neat to
> see some ASDF "schemas" (descriptions of how specific types of data
> are
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 3:34 PM Holley Friedlander wrote:
>
> I did reinstall/update xcode and command line tools. I then ran ./sage -f
> python2 and make and I believe it's working correctly now. At least the
> ./sage appears to run normally and I was able to checkout a branch. Thanks
> for
I did reinstall/update xcode and command line tools. I then ran ./sage -f
python2 and make and I believe it's working correctly now. At least the
./sage appears to run normally and I was able to checkout a branch. Thanks
for your help!
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 10:38 AM E. Madison Bray
wrote:
> On
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 5:27 PM Julian Rüth wrote:
>
> Hi Erik,
>
> I think this is not a problem on GitLab anymore. I can restart protected
jobs at least, so probably also entire pipelines.
I just noticed that as well. That's good news. I tried to find some
upstream issue about it just out of
Not to be confused with Another System Definition Facility, the de facto
standard build facility for Common Lisp
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 5:45 PM Nils Bruin wrote:
>
> On Friday, August 2, 2019 at 2:47:04 AM UTC-7, E. Madison Bray wrote:
>>
>> As I have written before, pickle is not an appropriate format for
>> long-term stable serialization, and never has been, as it is
>> inherently tied to the code which
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 8:09 AM Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>
> Hi Pavel,
>It looks pretty good overall, and it would be really nice to get the
> idempotents and representations into Sage. Then on top of that, you can make
> this notebook into a proper tutorial for Sage. Would you be willing to
10 matches
Mail list logo
