Re: [sage-devel] trouble pushing to a ticket

2022-01-19 Thread François Bissey
Just so you don’t feel alone, it happened to me earlier this month. I almost posted before googling the error. I have now replaced my 11 years old ssh key by a shinny new one. > On 20/01/2022, at 18:25, Steven Trogdon wrote: > > Didn't mean to send a private email. This worked, thanks. I was

[sage-devel] Re: pdf docs from jupyter notebook

2022-01-19 Thread Steven Trogdon
This is now https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33206 where the issue is, hopefully, more clearly explained and a potential solution provided. On Monday, January 10, 2022 at 11:30:27 AM UTC-7 Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > Hi, > > I am not sure to understand what your problem is: from a Sage Jupyter

Re: [sage-devel] trouble pushing to a ticket

2022-01-19 Thread Steven Trogdon
Didn't mean to send a private email. This worked, thanks. I was aware of the change but didn't realize the extent. Thanks again. On Wednesday, January 19, 2022 at 10:09:42 PM UTC-7 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On Wed, 2022-01-19 at 21:04 -0800, Steven Trogdon wrote: > > I'm having difficulty

Re: [sage-devel] trouble pushing to a ticket

2022-01-19 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Wed, 2022-01-19 at 21:04 -0800, Steven Trogdon wrote: > I'm having difficulty pushing to a ticket, which I've done many times > previously. When I push, i.e. > > OpenSSH 8.8 (recently stable on Gentoo) disables RSA with SHA-1. You can work around it, but probably the best long-term solution

[sage-devel] trouble pushing to a ticket

2022-01-19 Thread Steven Trogdon
I'm having difficulty pushing to a ticket, which I've done many times previously. When I push, i.e. git trac push ticket# I get STDERR: g...@trac.sagemath.org: Permission denied (publickey). STDERR: fatal: Could not read from remote repository. STDERR: STDERR: Please make sure

Re: [sage-devel] Re: https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.5

2022-01-19 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 7:52 PM Matthias Koeppe wrote: > > Check the link used for primecount please fixed, sorry. > > On Wednesday, January 19, 2022 at 11:39:47 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> OK,sorry, I looked in the wrong place. All fixed now. >> >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 7:34 PM

Re: [sage-devel] Re: https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.5

2022-01-19 Thread Matthias Koeppe
Check the link used for primecount please On Wednesday, January 19, 2022 at 11:39:47 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > OK,sorry, I looked in the wrong place. All fixed now. > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 7:34 PM Matthias Koeppe > wrote: > > > > You

Re: [sage-devel] Re: https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.5

2022-01-19 Thread Dima Pasechnik
OK,sorry, I looked in the wrong place. All fixed now. On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 7:34 PM Matthias Koeppe wrote: > > You added 2 bullet points after the existing 2 bullet points at the top of > section 4 "Number Theory". > After the 4 bullet points, there are 2 subsections. These are what appears

Re: [sage-devel] Re: https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.5

2022-01-19 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 7:05 PM Matthias Koeppe wrote: > > Which section are you missing? in the TOC there is 4. Number theory 1. Elliptic curves and isogenies 2. Modular and quasimodular forms 5. ... but it should be 4. Number theory 1. Elliptic curves and isogenies 2. Modular and

Re: [sage-devel] Re: https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.5

2022-01-19 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 6:43 PM Matthias Koeppe wrote: > > Yes, == and === is the wiki markup for sections so the section is already there. Why does the TOC only list 2 entries there? > > On Wednesday, January 19, 2022 at 10:41:56 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at

Re: [sage-devel] Re: https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.5

2022-01-19 Thread Matthias Koeppe
Yes, == and === is the wiki markup for sections On Wednesday, January 19, 2022 at 10:41:56 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 6:36 PM Matthias Koeppe > wrote: > > > > You didn't add a section > > no idea what this means, to add a section. Is `== Number theory ==` a >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.5

2022-01-19 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 6:36 PM Matthias Koeppe wrote: > > You didn't add a section no idea what this means, to add a section. Is `== Number theory ==` a section? What kind of magic is supposed to count the entries there? > > On Wednesday, January 19, 2022 at 10:30:14 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik

Re: [sage-devel] Re: https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.5

2022-01-19 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 5:24 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > Something about prinecount and related functions should be added. I'll do > this. OK, I've added a bit, but the TOC does not get updated, for some reason (Number theory should have 4 items, not 2). Dima > > > On Wed, 19 Jan 2022, 16:58

Re: [sage-devel] Re: https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.5

2022-01-19 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Something about prinecount and related functions should be added. I'll do this. On Wed, 19 Jan 2022, 16:58 Matthias Koeppe, wrote: > Any final additions to the Sage 9.5 release tour? > https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.5 > > >1. Symbolics >

[sage-devel] Re: https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.5

2022-01-19 Thread Matthias Koeppe
Any final additions to the Sage 9.5 release tour? https://wiki.sagemath.org/ReleaseTours/sage-9.5 1. Symbolics 1. Changes to symbolic expressions

Re: [sage-devel] Re: 32768

2022-01-19 Thread kcrisman
> In addition, for me its a matter of sustainability to use things as long > as they work. +1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: 32768

2022-01-19 Thread seb....@gmail.com
I have a 12 year old Acer AO Happy netbook (on Intel Atom CPU) which I'm running under LinuxMint. If I plan to do non CPU consuming work on the way to my office in subway trains and buses I still prefer it against a ThinkPad X240 because of weight, size and ergonomics. It still runs longer