I think that warning is not formulated optimally, regardless of when it gets shown. Aren't the docstrings meant as user documentation? The average user probably doesn't care about whether "doctests pass" and may not even know what that means. Presumably, the marker is there because the module needs sage.graphs to function properly. So a warning about a missing stated prerequisite is more in order, possibly with a pointer to documentation how to get it.
It seems a strange warning to me anyway, since sage.graphs is a standard module. Sage is seriously defective if it's missing. On Thursday, 21 September 2023 at 13:57:01 UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote: When running Sage, if I look at some docststrings by doing foo.bar?, I see at the top WARNING: the enclosing module is marked 'needs sage.graphs', so doctests may not pass. Of course my copy of Sage has (as far as I know!) a working copy of sage.graphs. Should this warning only be printed conditionally when the module is missing? I took a quick look and didn't see a relevant ticket, but I might very well have missed it. -- John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/ff945050-ff4f-4be9-ab73-4dd5bb93303an%40googlegroups.com.
