On 10/13/07, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/12/07, Bill Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent! So you and me could work together on Sage-via-andLinux.
Sounds good to me.
The build of Sage on andLinux worked fine. Everything seems to work as
advertised. It took
I was a little surprised by the number
lisp:340210 (6.96%)
For example, does the Lisp entry in
mercurial-0.9.5 python=27386,sh=8300,tcl=3484,lisp=1411,ansic=1364
make sense? As far as I know mercurial does not use any Lisp, or does it?
Regards,
Bill Page.
On 10/24/07, William
things have changed since I did this last, so it may take a little
more time but this should be completed in the new few days.
And as usual, if you have any questions, comments, suggestions or
criticisms I would be glad to hear them.
Regards,
Bill Page
On 01 Nov 2007 12:54:00 -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
Bill Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| new sites now. They can be found at:
|
| http://axiom-wiki.newsynthesis.org
|
| and
|
| http://axiom-portal.newsynthesis.org
What will happen to the email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Right now
On 11/1/07, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
Bill Page wrote:
...
new sites now. They can be found at:
http://axiom-wiki.newsynthesis.org
and
http://axiom-portal.newsynthesis.org
...
Bill, I must admit that I have doubts concerning your migration
tactic. AFAU there are two
welcome ;)
I am interested in Sage binaries on Solaris 10 for both Sparc and
Intel. Please let us know when and where you have a chance to do this.
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
some
significant improvements in the build since 2.41. I would be glad in
anyone can try this 'clisp-2.43-alpha.spkg' and let me know what works
and what doesn't. Also please feel free to take the above and run with
it. ;-)
Regards,
Bill Page
-ffi'.
Regards,
Bill Page.
On 12/5/07, Waldek Hebisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Page wrote:
While trying to build fricas:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cd ~/fricas-src
snip
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/fricas-build$ cd ~/fricas-build
using clisp:
snip
Features:
(REGEXP SYSCALLS I18N LOOP
a work around?
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http
Axiom/FriCAS in sage.
Regards,
Bill Page.
On 17 Jan 2008 20:28:49 +0100, Martin Rubey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Bill,
I try to push it a little: do you think you could make a new fricas package
for
sage. It seems to me that the last one is already a bit dated, isn't it? It
seems
Bill Page from the Algebraist Network has sent you a message:
First of all, thank you to everyone for your interest and participation in
Algebraist!
Algebraist on crowdvine.com is intended as a social network between
developers and users of Aldor as well as a front-end to other developer
that GCL is
necessarily the right lisp for Sage (or even that Sage needs a lisp
compiler at all) but I do rather think you should give GCL another
try. I would be glad to try to help you debug the problems on Solaris.
Regards,
Bill Page
of platforms.
Bill Page -- I would be interested in any comments you might have.
For example, is the fact that GCL doesn't build for us anywhere,
something that you think we'll get passed by just trying harder?
Or is it going to be really really hard.
The fact that it doesn't build for you
, mabshoff wrote:
On Apr 22, 7:36 am, Bill Page wrote:
...
The most recent branch 'Version_2_6_8pre' is what we normally
use to build Axiom. There is a change about 4 months old. If I
recall correctly 'Version_2_6_8pre' actually corresponds to the
version distributed on Debian and would
and will not magically make a project
better.
It seems to me that my proposal for the place that Axiom/Aldor could
have in Sage has more depth to it than that... :-(
...
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel
bone distribution it would be great.
Do you mean, for example eliminating the hyperdoc browser and Axiom
graphics? I think that trying to eliminate mathematical functionality
is not likely to save much in a bare bones distribution.
Regards,
Bill Page
Jason,
Perhaps this Axiom code might be of some use? The generic coding style
is rather similar to the way Python is used in Sage.
http://axiom-wiki.newsynthesis.org/JetLUDecomposition
Regards,
Bill Page.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
If I
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
maxthemouse wrote:
...
What was not clear to me was where I should send a mail/patch
for this. i.e. Who is charge of the fricas.spkg?
The packages were created by Bill Page. He also uploaded
them to some testing area on sagemath.org
-- Forwarded message --
From: maxthemouse adamwebb_...@yahoo.com
Date: Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:10 AM
Subject: Re: fricas and ECL
To: Bill Page bill.p...@newsynthesis.org
On Jun 18, 4:45 am, Bill Page bill.p...@newsynthesis.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Waldek
-- Forwarded message --
From: maxthemouse adamwebb_...@yahoo.com
Date: Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:26 AM
Subject: Re: fricas and ECL
To: Bill Page bill.p...@newsynthesis.org
Sorry,
I think I sent you the wrong version. That was the before the reply
from Waldek Hebisch. The following
-- Forwarded message --
From: Adam Webb adamwebb_...@yahoo.com
Date: Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 5:55 AM
Subject: fricas-1.0.6.p0.spkg
To: bill.p...@newsynthesis.org
Hi Bill,
I threw together a Sage package. (fricas-1.0.6.p0.spkg,
http://www.mediafire.com/file/whwmdzfimg2) The big
.
Regards,
Bill Page.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Adam Webb adamwebb_...@yahoo.com
Date: Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 9:58 AM
Subject: patch for fricas.py
To: Bill Page bill.p...@newsynthesis.org
Bill,
I made two changes to fricas.py to make the tests pass. The first is
sage: a = fricas(x
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Bill Page wrote:
-
h = f(x^2).diff(x)*(x+1/x)
sage: h.subs(f(x^2)==1)
2*(x + 1/x)*x*D[0](f)(x^2)
sage: h.subs(f(x^2).diff(x)==0)
2*(x + 1/x)*x*D[0](f)(x^2)
-
It does
much algebra to use?
+1
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group
experience with VirtualBox is very positive on
Windows Vista, Debian and SuSE linux systems.
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel
not
quite so raw.
So normally one would write for example:
(2) - integrate(sin(x),x=a..b)
(2) - cos(b) + cos(a)
Type: Union(f1: OrderedCompletion(Expression(Integer)),...)
Why doesn't Sage support something like this?
Regards,
Bill Page
This used to work. Is it a known problem?
The traceback does not make much sense to me. I guess a lot has
changed in this code since sage-3.4
I would appreciate any help/suggestions for debugging.
Thanks.
wsp...@debian:~/sage-4.1.1$ ./sage
/6517
) with the included ecl (also works with the updated ecl that is
coming). It would be great if someone could review these two
tickets.
Thanks! I will install and look at both of these ASAP.
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Martin Rubey wrote:
Bill Page writes:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 8:34 AM, MaxTheMouse wrote:
This is a known problem. The patch at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6318
should fix this.
sage: expr=x+1
sage: maxima(expr)
x+1
sage: fricas(expr
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
Bill Page writes:
What version of Sage are you using? What patches applied
(if any)?
4.0.2, combinat branch, patches 6318 applied.
Ok, thanks. I am currently testing with Sage 4.1.1. Without patch
6318, I get the error that I reported
Bill Page wrote:
So this patch really does depend on installing a later version of
FriCAS than what is available at the Sage web site.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 6:10 AM, MaxTheMouse wrote:
The patch at 6318 was changed for how the newer version of fricas
behaves. My thought
and type
sage: notebook()
and enter the admin password (twice). Hit control-C. and exit
3) Now enter 'notebook' to start Sage notebook
4) Start browser with url shown.
Regards,
Bill Page.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Yoav Aner wrote:
Don't know if anyone's interested, but I've converted
...@debian:~/sage-4.1.1/spkg/build/fricas-1.0.7.p0$
Regards,
Bill Page.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
I am sure that the Aldor-interface used to build with GCL. But rather
than invest time to continue to support it maybe it would be better to
try to make sure that the Aldor
the log.
Regards,
Bill Page.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
But after including '-lm' it fails again with the following error:
Bill, could you send me the exact list of commands to arrive at this
error. Maybe you even have the full log of this 'make'.
Are you sure
Ralf,
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
On 09/03/2009 02:48 PM, Bill Page wrote:
I am sorry, I don't the logs to send but if you have any problems with
the instructions below, then I can reproduce and send them later.
Assuming that you already have Aldor and Sage
) libaxiom.al plus code to create the runtime files (APL2-licenced)
Of course B) depends on A), but I believe there is a way to say this
in an .spkg file.
I must say, I rather like to go for 3).
Any comments?
+1
I also very much like your option 3)
Regards,
Bill Page
Jason,
What are the Sage version prerequisites for this package (if any)?
Besides new features is there a list of bug fixes? In particular, do
you know if this version solves the problem with jmol on some Windows
XP systems that has been mentioned occasionally here on this list?
Regards,
Bill
on the same server when viewed from
the other clients works fine.
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Alfredo Portes wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Bill Page wrote:
Unfortunately there is no change in behavior with this update. It
still works fine for me on my Linux clients and when using Windows
Vista, but on a slightly older laptop running
allocation on this system is not enough. Is there some way to
configure the JRE on Windows to make more memory available?
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
I'd like to propose a new item in the
File ...
drop-down box. One thing that has always bugged me is having to
Rename a worksheet before clicking Save. I have also seen it stump a
few first time users of the Notebook. How about a
Save As ...
option that prompts you with a pop-up for a
really mean at the file level, the files that you will
probably care most about are those found in the src/algebra directory.
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
system or maybe linking the Python into the
lisp image that runs Axiom?
What do you think? Is this crazy?
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL
for compiled code in Cython or interfaces to
external libraries? How important is the web-based notebook interface?
... Just some different ideas. I know ideas are cheap, but you did ask. :-)
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 9:53 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Bill Page wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:57 AM, William Stein wrote:
I'm giving a plenary talk at ISSAC in Linz, Austria this summer. I'm
supposed
to write a 2-page abstract
that's a reasonable
thing to talk about for that conference...
I think it would be great if you could spend at least 50% of your talk
on this subject - or better - way not plan to give two talks! :-)
...
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post
not the first)
seemed like a good balance to me: What is Sage? What can it do?
This one is more about: What you would like to do to make Sage more
than what it is so far. It seems to me that at best that deserves a
few minutes toward the end of the second abstract.
Regards,
Bill Page
is likely to
require or at least interact with such generic programming features.
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options
it as a plus that coercion has
been given a more categorical founding.
Absolutely! :-)
BTW, where can I read more about these categorical concepts that are
currently built-in or planned for Sage?
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 5:48 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Bill Page wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Jun 3, 2008, at 11:17 AM, Gary Furnish wrote:
...
I consider homsets to be a gigantic flaw in coercion that
absolutely have
to correct or comment as time permits, that would be
great.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Jun 3, 2008, at 4:50 PM, Bill Page wrote:
How does it [categories in Sage] relate to the
concept of parent - which seems equally ill-defined to me?
A Parent is an Object
Ring
sage: parent(t[1])
Integer Ring
-
Notice that the parent of t[1] is incorrect in the 2nd case.
Is there any interest in also implementing the Co-product constructor?
What about Record and Union constructors?
Regards,
Bill Page
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:07 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Bill Page wrote:
Is there any interest in also implementing the Co-product constructor?
Yes.
What about Record and Union constructors?
I don't know what those are (at least what Record is).
Records
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Jun 4, 2008, at 4:07 AM, Bill Page wrote:
...
These seem consistent to me, albeit rather complex. However I am
not sure I understand the following:
sage: parent(IntegerRing())
type 'sage.rings.integer_ring.IntegerRing_class'
sage
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:06 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Bill Page wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
David's explanation of this is right on. We need parent() to work
in some sensible way on non-Elements (e.g. Python ints, objects
:
http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=86641
It is possible to write a Python class that provides these types.
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 1:47 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Bill Page wrote:
...
Python classes can also take parameters.
I didn't know that. I thought the only way to create a Python class
is for the Python interpreter to execute Python code that looks like
.
Agreed.
Python can treat types as fully first class objects. I think this
strongly supports William's initial decision to choose Python as the
basis for a new computer algebra system comparable to Magma and Axiom.
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post
class), parent (an object in some
category) and category. Metaclasses are a good match for Categories.
Thus you can have everything in one package and remain closer to
conventional Python programming in spirit.
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:16 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Jun 4, 2008, at 7:35 PM, Bill Page wrote:
...
Types are all about the implementations of things, they
synonymous with the classes of Object Oriented programming,
and are insufficient (and the wrong vehicle) to carry deeper
and CommutativeRing are categories. characteristic is a method
of Integer.
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group
/5/08, Bill Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you still consider the example code like that given above by
Gonzalo unnatural and ugly? It seems like pretty standard
Python to me. There of course various ways of packaging the
metaclass machinery to provide an even cleaner user interface.
I do
Martin,
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 1:59 AM, Martin Rubey wrote:
Bill Page writes:
I am not so sure that a similar role can be played by FriCAS.
The FriCAS/Axiom libraries are not so easily called by an
external program. Instead we have the same option to interface
with FriCAS as we have
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Bill Page wrote:
...
Anyway, I think there is a lot of potential for improvement in the
existing 'axiom.py' interface even without considering how to
solve the problem of an efficient application program
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Bill Page wrote:
...
There is supposed to be an easy way to call programs compiled
with ECL from C (and thus via some suitable wrapper from Python
or from Cython), but I have yet to see this demonstrated
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Bill Page wrote:
... It is not so easy to call Python code from a C mainline
program either, is it?
Thanks to Cython, it is very easy to call my Python implementation
of something from pure C. And it's
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Bill Page wrote:
Ok, thanks for the example. Yes I admit that using Cython this way
is quite nice. It makes me think that maybe it would be interesting
to write such Cython wrappers for calling larger
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 4:23 AM
Subject: Re: axiom
To: Bill Page [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, please post it to sage-devel and I'll reply there.
I wasn't sure what your reply would be, so I started offlist. :)
Ondrej
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:50 AM, mhampton wrote:
I really need to go to sleep so I won't do a top-ten, but here's a
top 2:
1) Powerful substitutions and rules. Sage does not have anything
comparable. The .subs() function is buggy even in its limited
domain. There have been previous
ordering are available in all systems by design and so I see no good
reason not to use them until a better approach is implemented.
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
(foo, ExpectElement) and not foo.parent() is self:
foosage = foo._sage_() # i.e. convert to Sage and then to the other
system return self(foosage)
Yes, I think this is a good idea that allows the external interface to
be more intelligent.
Regards,
Bill Page
for the
Axiom type system.
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 9:31 PM, Bill Page wrote:
#4028: Mike Hansen: doctest and improve sage/interfaces/axiom.py
[Reviewed by Michael Abshoff]
I have looked carefully at the changes to 'axiom.py' by Mike Hansen
and I think there is a serious problem: The change relating to
displaying
?
If you wrote:
sage: axiom('2.123::DoubleFloat')
you would see what you expect.
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Bill Page wrote:
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
I still find the following behavior much worse than the current
behavior (which is why I made the change):
sage: axiom(2.123)
float(156649750673941527080,-66,2)
That's not useful
Here is a better definition:
def float(x,e,b):
return RealField(axiom('precision()$Float'))(x)*b^e
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Bill Page wrote:
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Bill Page wrote:
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
I still find the following behavior
Polynomial Integer.
Types are first class objects in Axiom but 'Polynomial' is not a type
- it is a functor, i.e. it is a constructor that takes an argument.
'Polynomial(Integer)' on the other hand is a type.
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post
, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Bill Page wrote:
Excellent. I have applied this patch to
sage-3.1.2.alpha4-sage.math-only-x86_64-Linux and with fricas-1.0.3
installed. I tried a few things and so far it seems to work great!
I'll have more time to test it thoroughly in the next 24 hours and let
you
)
--
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http
support for compiling new Axiom library code
written in the Spad language.
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options
issues the FriCAS and Aldor package for Sage must
currently remain separate. I am doubtful however if compiling Aldor
from source can be made much less than 10 or 15 minutes in total. So
maybe it is a good thing that they remain separate packages anyway.
Regards,
Bill Page
of the page under the heading: Download in other formats
Click the link
* Original Format
This is the format you can use with patch.
There were a couple of other changes that I suggested in emails to
Mike (including the compiler patch) but he has not yet included them
here yet.
Regards,
Bill Page
of set_xxx and is_xxx.
This patch also includes the necessary code to compile spad files @@
-362,6 +362,41 @@
Regards,
Bill Page.
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
I think the following *should* work...
sage: a = axiom.sin(x)
I hacked around axiom.py a little, and came
-sage.math-only-x86_64-Linux/devel/sage-main/sage/interfaces/FOO.NRLIB/code
sage: axiom.bar(1)
2
without having to re-compile the source for FOO again. The NRLIB would
remain there indefinitely until replaced or deleted by the user.
Regards,
Bill Page.
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Bill
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Bill Page wrote:
...
After the fricas-1.0.3.spkg installation the Axiom library is located here:
$SAGE_ROOT/local/lib/fricas/target/x86_64-unknown-linux/algebra
This is where all the algebra-related object files are located.
Probably this is also a logical
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
...
It is better to put it somewhere in DOT_SAGE
You mean like:
out = self._eval_line(')cd '+DOT_SAGE+'/fricas/algebra', reformat=False)
How/when to create this directory?
Regards,
Bill Page
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Bill Page wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
...
It is better to put it somewhere in DOT_SAGE
You mean like:
out = self._eval_line(')cd '+DOT_SAGE+'/fricas/algebra',
reformat=False)
How/when to create this directory
).
Is there any problem with that?
Regards,
Bill Page.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:43 AM, mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
after 251 closed tickets here we go. This is rc5/final and likely
identical to the 3.1.2 release. There was an rc4 that never got
publicly announced since it had some Gremlins
to shift-Enter a little
later.
Maybe one could put an 'add text' link formatted like 'evaluate'
somewhere near the top right of the cell? These links could be visible
by default, but it might also be nice to be able to turn them off
(display:none) when one get tired of the cues.
Regards,
Bill Page
I have made
and post a patch there. Other FriCAS/Sage developers working in
parallel on this would be a very good thing.
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
in 'axiom.py'.
If any has some ideas about how best to do this, I would be very
interested.
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more
Warning: This email consists mostly of a rant on category theory,
computer algebra, and a comparison of implementations that is somewhat
tangential to the main subject.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Bill Page wrote:
The Sage concept of 'parent' is an attempt to capture similar
generic
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:31 PM, Bill Page wrote:
...
It seems to me that of all the existing computer algebra systems,
because of it's strong and often pedantic type system, Axiom
seems most compatible with taking category theory
integral_test1.py, line 96, in module
time_Maxima_friCAS(integrand)
File integral_test1.py, line 81, in time_Maxima_friCAS
print Maxima Time:, mx_time.stats[_sage_const_3 ],
mx_time.stats[_sage_const_4 ]
AttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute 'stats'
Regards,
Bill Page.
On Tue, Nov
'
The script runs ok if I comment out the timing:
else:
test_eval(test,test_int,desired_result)
#time_Maxima_friCAS(integrand)
Any ideas?
Regards,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage
anything named 'stats':
It appears that 'sage_timeit.py' was not updated by '-upgrade'.
Note: Directory sage-3.1.4 is where I previously built sage from
source. I did not change this name when I did '-upgrade'.
Regards.
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Bill Page wrote:
It seems that none of these files has anything named 'stats':
It appears that 'sage_timeit.py' was not updated by '-upgrade'.
Note: Directory sage-3.1.4 is where I previously built sage
,
Bill Page.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Bill Page wrote:
Still unhappy. Did it really mean 'don't forget to commit'? Where?
You just run hg ci to commit the merge. Then to make the
changes active, you have to start sage with sage -br
1 - 100 of 332 matches
Mail list logo
