Hi Anne,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Anne Schilling a...@math.ucdavis.edu wrote:
SNIP
The install hangs at a different spot with sage 4.2.1...
This might be related to this recent thread [1] and an older thread
[2]. I think a fix is at ticket #7473 [3].
[1]
Hi Anne,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Anne Schilling a...@math.ucdavis.edu wrote:
SNIP
That's why I suggested to downgrade to sage 4.2 (where I did not have the
problem). But apparently there was still a problem.
I think the hanging problem goes as far back as Sage 4.2. John
Palmieri
Hi Mike,
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
I think it could relatively easily be added to the sage -merge script.
Do you want to open a ticket (and CC me) to track this issue?
Something like what Florent describes is a nice way to sanitize a
patch's
Hi Anne,
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 6:13 AM, Anne Schilling a...@math.ucdavis.edu wrote:
SNIP
Here are a couple more papers that cite or acknowledge sage that
could be added to the page:
I have updated the publications page [1] with the above three publications.
[1]
Hi Nicolas,
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
SNIP
It's important for the Sage-Combinat project to have a list of
publications one way or the other.
Nod.
How is http://www.sagemath.org/library-publications.html managed? Is
it built
Hi Nicolas,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
SNIP
What's the rationale for not using a plain bibtex file as internal
database format?
I don't see an optional url field in any of the supported entry
types. The value of the url field is a
Hi Nicolas,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
SNIP
There seems to be a few open source python bibtex parser around, like:
https://launchpad.net/pybtex/.
That looks promising and worth trying.
(I haven't so can't recommend any one in
Hi folks,
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:58 PM, slabbe sla...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the final alpha release of Sage 4.3.3. The next release would
be an rc0. The development version of Sage is now in feature freeze.
Does that mean only ticket solving a defect will be merged into sage
until
Hi William,
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 3:09 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
I hope 4.3.3 can be out... tomorrow.
How about a Sage 4.3.3.final with #8295 released Sunday Pacific time?
Then one could produce Sage 4.3.4 incorporating changes from Sage Days
20.
--
Regards
Minh Van
Hi Robert,
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 5:53 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
SNIP
If 4.3.3 is in the home stretch, there's no reason you (or anyone else)
can't start on the 4.3.4 release right now, and then merging the couple of
(new, usually pretty non-invasive) patches
Hi William,
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 7:12 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Anyway,
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8314
has to get merged in before we can release 4.3.3, since we can't
release with test failures on Ubuntu 32.
Noted.
So can you swap out
Hi Dan,
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:50 AM, bump b...@match.stanford.edu wrote:
SNIP
Also, why isn't Nicolas' dot2tex-2.8.7 spkg being distributed with
Sage?
Here, I assume you mean to ship dot2tex as a standard spkg. The
following lists some criteria for an spkg to be part of the standard
spkg
Hi Dan,
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 7:03 AM, bump b...@match.stanford.edu wrote:
* At least one person must step up to maintain the dot2tex for the
next few years. There is at least one case where a package was part of
the standard spkg repository, i.e. dsage. However, after a few months
the lead
Hi Jason,
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Jason Bandlow jband...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
1) Remove the 'subtopics' from the current index. I.e., when opening
the reference manual, one would just see links:
* The Sage Command Line
* The Sage Notebook
* Symbolic Calculus
...
Ideally,
Hi Nicolas,
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
SNIP
For the first one, __init__ import's primer. For the second, I set
the __doc__ entry.
Yes, that trick of yours is certainly better than hacking sage/all.py.
One problem down, one to go. I
Hi John,
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 7:00 AM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
You could use the command browse_sage_doc defined in
sage.misc.sagedoc: this allows you to open up documentation from
within Sage. More precisely, add the documents you want to the class
_sage_doc.
Hi Nicolas,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
SNIP
Wouldn't it be preferable to not introduce yet another mean of
accessing the documentation, and instead use the standard:
sage.groups.tutorial?
or
Hi Christian,
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Christian Stump
christian.st...@gmail.com wrote:
I gonna open a ticket on this, if no one was already looking at it.
The problem is fixed at ticket #8395 [1]. For example, after applying
the patches on that ticket, this is what I get using the
Hi Eviatar,
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Eviatar eviatarb...@gmail.com wrote:
Shouldn't this be deleted? It's Sage 4.3.4.
http://combinat.sagemath.org/doc/reference/index.html
That part of the Sage website belongs to and managed by the Sage-Combinat team.
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--
Hi Samuel,
I'm forwarding your message to sage-combinat-devel, where it properly belongs.
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
-- Forwarded message --
From: Samuel Lelievre samuel.lelie...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:30 PM
Subject: [sage-release] error cloning
To: sage-release
--- doc-main-2.11.0/tut/tutworks.tex2008-03-31 13:11:51.0 +1000
+++ doc-main-2.11.1/tut/tutworks.tex2008-04-02 08:00:46.0 +1000
@@ -2777,7 +2777,7 @@
We can also compute the above power in some of the computer
algebra systems that \sage includes. In each case we execute
--- doc-main-2.11.0/ref/libs.tex2008-03-31 13:11:51.0 +1000
+++ doc-main-2.11.1/ref/libs.tex2008-04-02 08:23:12.0 +1000
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
The interfaces are implemented via shared libraries and data is moved
between systems purely in memory. In particular, there
--- doc-main-2.11.0/ref/networking.tex 2008-03-31 13:11:51.0 +1000
+++ doc-main-2.11.1/ref/networking.tex 2008-04-02 08:24:06.0 +1000
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
mature, fast, and offers a vast range of networking functionality.
The SAGE Notebook (see Chapter~\ref{ch:notebook})
-is
--- doc-main-2.11.0/doc/doc.tex 2008-03-31 13:11:51.0 +1000
+++ doc-main-2.11.1/doc/doc.tex 2008-04-02 08:43:35.0 +1000
@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@
\LaTeX{} provides a variety of environments even without the
additional markup provided by the Python-specific document classes
-
--- doc-main-2.11.0/inst/inst.tex 2008-03-31 13:11:51.0 +1000
+++ doc-main-2.11.1/inst/inst.tex 2008-04-02 08:51:30.0 +1000
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@
Complete compilation of \SAGE is currently not supported on Solaris
or *BSD. It is possible to compile most of \SAGE
Hi group,
Does anyone know where I can download the latest version of the
doc-main tree? I'm referring to the doc-main that is bundled with
every release of Sage, including both the stable and alpha releases.
AFAIK with each stable release, e.g. sage-2.11, doc-main is usually
located at
Hi Michael,
I generally do not build the documentation in a release cycle until
were are getting close to the final release. This is mostly due to
sage.math not having all the needed bits in the LaTeX toolchain
installed.
[...]
I put releases together in
Hi Serge,
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Serge A. Salamanka salsa-...@tut.by wrote:
Great improvement !
It will be cool to make planet just the same design as sagemath and
create the same logo Planet SAGE.
I'm not sure what you mean there. Can you give an example illustrating
your design
Hi Harald,
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Harald Schilly
harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 25, 5:58 am, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, I've tweaked planet sage a bit ...
Small update, I've sticked my fingers into the templates and css code.
Now the borders are better
Hi folks,
I encountered the following RuntimeError while testing a __cmp__
method in a class I'm writing:
*** BEGIN TRANSCRIPT ***
--
| Sage Version 4.0, Release Date: 2009-05-29 |
| Type notebook() for
Hi William,
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 9:12 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Minh,
I wonder if you could put together release notes and a release tour
for Sage-4.0? It's been released and binaries have been posted.
I've been constantly working on the release tour for Sage 4.0.
Hi Harald,
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Harald Schilly
harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
btw, i started a blog too, just to be also listed there :)
will contain random thoughts and website/stats updates ...
http://harald-schilly.blogspot.com/search/label/sage
I've added your blog to
Hi Mike,
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 3:42 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Micheal Abshoff was the only one who ever made them, so I hope you can
figure it out.
Jason Grout and I started them. You can find them at
Hi Harald,
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Harald Schilly
harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
it's noted in the readme file, the part about the new release procedures.
you have to go into the ./www/inc subdirectory, there is a
variables.shtml file.
but, before you edit it and announce the
Hi Harald,
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Harald Schilly
harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 02:41, William Stein wst...@gmail.com
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/doc/
Harald, can you take care of pushing this to sagemath.org, or ...
should we get Minh to
Hi Mike,
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 3:42 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Micheal Abshoff was the only one who ever made them, so I hope you can
figure it out.
Jason Grout and I started them. You can find them at
Hi Georg,
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:01 AM, gsw georgswe...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
Since (the Sage review process and) the Sage release process have been
pretty stable for more than a year now, this should go right into a
new chapter in the Sage Development Guide. (IIRC Minh already has
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 3:42 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Micheal Abshoff was the only one who ever made them, so I hope you can
figure it out.
Jason Grout and I started them. You can find them at
Hi Robert,
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
SNIP
You can find a nicely formatted release tour of Sage 4.0 at
http://mvngu.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/sage-4-0-released/
The same is up at http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-4.0 , right?
The
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
SNIP
You can find a nicely formatted release tour of Sage 4.0 at
http://mvngu.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/sage-4-0-released/
The same is up at http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-4.0 , right?
Just a sec, it used
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
SNIP
You can find a nicely formatted release tour of Sage 4.0 at
http://mvngu.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/sage-4-0-released
Hi Harald,
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Harald Schilly harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 06:33, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
You can find a nicely formatted release tour of Sage 4.0 at
http://mvngu.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/sage-4-0-released/
cool thanks
Hi Nick,
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
In the meantime, can someone cut an alpha0 for Mac OS X 10.5?
(Preferably just tar.gz, not dmg.) Also, is such a thing done via
just sage -bdist?
Not quite. After successfully compiling from source,
Hi William,
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 7:15 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing a Sage grand tour worksheet with one section for each of
the 39 main modules in SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/sage/. For each, there is
a quick summary of what it is about and where it comes from, then
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Georg,
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:01 AM, gsw georgswe...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
Since (the Sage review process and) the Sage release process have been
pretty stable for more than a year now, this should go right
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Rob Beezergoo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote:
I particularly like the suggestions for projects, which at first
blush, look like they are geared to an undergraduate audience. I
suspect there are folks with the ability and inclination to contribute
to Sage, but
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:40 AM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Sage-4.0.1 has been released (by William Stein and Mike Hansen). You
can download it from
http://sagemath.org/src/
as usual. I'm building binaries right now too (which should work on a
wider range of processors,
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:01 AM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
All tests passed on sage.math, except for the following:
[mv...@sage sage-4.0.1]$ sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/interfaces/psage.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/local/sage/local/bin/sage-test, line
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 10:32:34AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
SNIP
There's interest in creating a function in Sage that will apply the
patches from a given trac ticket, run all tests, verify that the docs
don't break, and report the result. The idea is that this
Hi Pablo,
Pablo De Napoli wrote:
Hi,
I'm thinking about presenting a talk on Sage on the next Python
Argentina 2009 conference
which will be held in Buenos Aires on next September. and is
organized by Pyar (the Python user group of
Argentina, http://python.org.ar/pyar/)
(If you can
Hi folks,
This one is from the Axiom mailing list at the thread
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/axiom-developer/2009-06/msg00016.html
The relevant collection of algebraic identities is at
http://sites.google.com/site/tpiezas/
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
Hi John,
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 6:12 PM, John Cremonajohn.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure how you obtained your list of people who contributed but
there's more than one patch in there authored by me, as well as
various reviews (and reviewers should definitely be listed).
Mike Hansen
Hi John,
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 6:49 PM, John Cremonajohn.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hold on, I'm not complaining or offended! Everythin is properly
credited on the release tour, but in the email you listed 35 names
which did not include all the ones mentioned (and properly credited)
on the
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Nick Alexanderncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
== List of closed tickets ==
This will come with the release email for the next rc; if you want to
see it right away, it's here:
Hi Burcin,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Burcin Erocalbur...@erocal.org wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:49:29 +
Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
#6268: Burcin Erocal: Typesetting of sec(x), csc(x), cot(x) are broken
[Reviewed by Nick Alexander]
Credit for this should
Hi David,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:57 PM, davidloefflerdave.loeff...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
I actually got an error (rather than a warning) from the docstring for
elliptic curve period lattices -- a typo, \signa, had confused
LaTeX.
This has been fixed at #6297. It has positive review,
Hi Dan,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Dan Drakedr...@kaist.edu wrote:
I was looking through the tasks on the trac server, and noticed #6056:
the HISTORY.txt is now very outdated. Also, nothing has been sent to
sage-announce since February.
I've tried sending release announcements to
Hi Dan,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Dan Drakedr...@kaist.edu wrote:
SNIP
While searching around, I found that the release tours on the wiki
sometimes link to a nonexistent release note: in
http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-3.4.2 the link to
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:31 AM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sage-Devel,
Should we be using twitter for something?
I'm not sure if that will catch on. I've created the Sage Math
LinkedIn group a few weeks ago
http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2010654
So far there's only 11
Hi kcrisman,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:12 AM, kcrismankcris...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
By the way, the release notes for 3.0.3 never happened, but they do
exist (somewhere) on sage-devel if you go through them enough (as I
had to once), so if you are looking for something to occupy a half-
Hi kcrisman,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:07 AM, kcrismankcris...@gmail.com wrote:
The release note for Sage 3.0.3 is already up at
http://www.sagemath.org/src/announce/sage-3.0.3.txt
Michael Abshoff also copied it to sage-announce at:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:23 AM, bparkisbpar...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm on Ubuntu-8.04 on an i386 Macbook using KDE. Kernel is 2.6.24-21-
server.
The install log is 45 megs, so here's just the last stage where it
failed:
STAGE 2-4-5: GEMV TUNE
make -f Makefile INSTALL_LOG/cMVRES
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:36 AM, bparkisbpar...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
This looks to me like your system was overloaded or something (just a
guess). But can you give some information about your hardware, like
CPU speed, etc.
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
Intel core duo, dual core 1.83
Hi Martin,
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Martin
Albrechtm...@informatik.uni-bremen.de wrote:
SNIP
The Sage Development Process
- Trac/Reviews: the process
- How to Review Patches
Ticket #6226 might be relevant here. The patches on that ticket add
further documentation to the
Hi David,
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I was using t2 fine earlier (about 12 hours ago) and all seemed ok, but
any attempt for me to ssh to it now just hangs.
Note, I disabled telnet and ftp the other day on t2, as they are an
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Craig Citrocraigci...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
I believe that the necessary upgrade bits are sitting here, but I
haven't tried it:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/craigcitro/release/sage-4.0.2.rc3/
Upgraded from sage-4.0.2.rc3 OK on sage.math. But soon
Hi folks,
Here is a release note for Sage 4.0.2. I'm sending this only to
sage-release and sage-devel. The announcement on sage-announce will be
forthcoming when binaries are in order, and a release tour is ready.
Sage 4.0.2 was released on June 18th, 2009. It is available at
Hi Martin,
On 6/22/09, Martin Albrecht m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de wrote:
Hi,
as mentioned earlier I am preparing a talk on how to get started with Sage
development for Tuesday here at SD16. A first rc for my set of slides is at:
Hi folks,
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Robert Millerrlmills...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the first release of the new cycle, and I've agreed to step in
and co-chair the release with Tom. The source tarball and sage.math
binary are available:
SNIP
Here are the tickets merged in Sage
Hi folks,
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Robert Millerrlmills...@gmail.com wrote:
This release is primarily the Python upgrade.
SNIP
The following tickets were merged in Sage 4.1.alpha1:
#6085: Robert Miller: Finish full implementation of c_graphs [Reviewed
by Tom Boothby]
#6359: Mike
Hi folks,
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Tom Boothbytomas.boot...@gmail.com wrote:
Sage 4.1.alpha2 has been released, find it at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/boothby/releases
SNIP
The following tickets were merged in Sage 4.1.alpha2:
#4712: John Palmieri: Make the doctest
Hi Peter,
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Peter
Jeremypeterjer...@optushome.com.au wrote:
What is the policy regarding Cc'ing SPKG Maintainers and/or Upstream
Contacts in trac tickets? There's nothing in TracGuidelines about it
but I've had a Maintainer get upset that he wasn't Cc'd on a
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 11:55 PM, NoSyudon...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
So I find the python code and modify it.
sageroot/devel/sage/sage/server/notebook/cell.py:211
211 : /script%(self.__id,self.__id,self.__text)
=
211 : /script%(self.__id,self.__id,((self.__text).decode
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Robert Millerrlmills...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
merged the following:
#6429 [with patch; positive review] sagedoc: make search_src and
friends less OS dependent
#6258 [with patch, positive review] Improve accuracy of graph
eigenvalues
#6196 [with
Hi Simon,
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Simon Kingsimon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Dear Sage devel,
writing a test suite for my cohomology package, I got rather
frustrated. After working around the randomness of some Gap functions,
I am now concerned with the computation time.
It happened
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:13 AM, gswgeorgswe...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
If this does answer your questions, please feel free to open a trac
ticket Developers' Guide enhancement: About spkg-check. :-)
If a trac ticket is opened about this, then I think one also needs to
add information
Hi folks,
Knapsack problems and their algorithmic solutions have many
applications in industry, with operation research and cryptography to
name two. As many, if not all, of the operation research software of
COIN-OR are covered by licenses that are incompatible with GPLv2+, I
have thought about
Hi David,
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:34 PM, David Joynerwdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
I'm not an expert but did find this ((essentially vacuous) page:
http://www.coin-or.org/SYMPHONY/branchandcut/MCKP/
and the knapsack problem is listed among the applications of Symphony:
Hi William,
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:44 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
You might also want to implement a LLL-based knapsack solving
algorithm, since Sage includes fplll which is an extremely fast LLL
implementation.
I don't know if this page is any good but it is about
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
SNIP
How do you include modules from a new directory in Sage? I tried
as you suggested but sage somehow is not finding the module.
See sage/setup.py (search for packages). Put your directory in there.
Also,
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
William Stein wrote:
* No glossy printed reference manual
Add You can't purchase a printed reference manual. There is a
glossy nice pdf reference manual, but it's not for sale. I have
printed it out before
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Robert Millerrlmills...@gmail.com wrote:
Source tarball, sage.math binary, and upgrade URL are, respectively:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.rc0.tar
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:02 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
It seems that in Sage 4.0.1.rc0, there is an error when I tried
building the PDF version of the reference manual. If you're
interested, the complete LaTeX log is here:
Hi folks,
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Robert Millerrlmills...@gmail.com wrote:
All known issues have been fixed, and all long doctests pass on
sage.math (* -- see below), so there is a chance this could be
sage-4.1.
The source tarball:
Hi Christian,
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Christian Weissweissi-ch...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello,
I tried to build a sage server on a SLES11-System. But the
installation was aborted with the following error message:
SNIP
make[1]: *** [installed/sqlite-3.5.3.p4] Fehler 1
make[1]: Leaving
Hi Christian,
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:54 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Christian Weissweissi-ch...@gmx.de wrote:
SNIP
Hello,
IT WORKS! I have downloaded your linked file and: now it works!
Thanks a lot!
Are you any longer interested
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Robert Millerrlmills...@gmail.com wrote:
All known issues have been fixed, and all long doctests pass on
sage.math (* -- see below), so there is a chance this could be
sage-4.1.
Here's an annoying issue with the documentation builder. In Sage
4.0.2, the
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:24 PM, luisfelftab...@yahoo.es wrote:
Hi,
Some days ago I sent a bug report using the notebook link to the
google docs
form. I am unable to find that bug report on the web.
Anyway as the thing is trivial I wrote a patch myself.
The problem is that
Hi Ralf,
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Ralf Hemmecker...@hemmecke.de wrote:
William, thanks for this hint.
But I still have a little comment.
I've just started
./sage -f mpir-1.2.p4
and actually I really was wondering how this can work if I only have the
binary version of sage.
Hi Ralf,
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Ralf Hemmecker...@hemmecke.de wrote:
The complete Sage source is contained in any binary distribution of Sage.
I would argue that this statement is wrong unless you defind what
'complete sage source' actually means.
I think I was using the wrong
Hi Ralf,
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Ralf Hemmecker...@hemmecke.de wrote:
H... looking at
ftp://ftp.fu-berlin.de/unix/misc/sage/src/index.html
I wonder why these files are not zipped.
Shouldn't gzip, bzip2, 7zip be just fine?
What is the rationale behind distributing unzipped tar
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:51 PM, davidloefflerdave.loeff...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Thanks for noting this. This is one of the problems we're trying to
eliminate at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6187
I will try to update the current patches so that the builder does not
throw
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I just noticed an old thread, where a user had problems on squite,
making his own version of some packages with an alpha, heta or rc
release of Sage.
It would be good if alpha/beta/rc releases always showed a
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
John H Palmieri wrote:
On Jul 9, 6:06 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I just noticed an old thread, where a user had problems on squite,
making his own version of some packages with an alpha,
Hi Suresh,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:26 AM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
Harald,
Another paper that cites Sage! The abstract begins We show that the
generating function of electrically charged 1/2-BPS states in N=4
supersymmetric CHL Z_N orbifolds of the heterotic string on T^6
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Ralf Hemmecker...@hemmecke.de wrote:
I've just downloaded
ftp://ftp.fu-berlin.de/unix/misc/sage/linux/32bit/sage-4.0.2-linux-Debian_GNU_Linux_5.0_lenny-i686-Linux.tar.gz
and typed as described in
Hi folks,
Recently, some people have reported that the download pages for Sage
is confusing and has little information on how to select the
appropriate distribution to download. See for example this thread in
sage-devel:
Hi Ralf,
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Ralf Hemmecker...@hemmecke.de wrote:
SNIP
2) On the download page I would have expected to see posted a few
differences of the binary and the source distribution of sage.
The design with 'sage -f' and your hint of how I can recompile is great,
but
Hi Pat,
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Pat LeSmitheqed...@gmail.com wrote:
Minh Nguyen wrote:
The purpose of a release tour is to provide a high-level summary of
features. It should provide some explanation about a feature, some
useful code samples, and pretty pictures if relevant. Your
Hi Ralf,
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Ralf Hemmecker...@hemmecke.de wrote:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/DownloadGuide
The download guide in its present state needs to be further fleshed
out with more information. Having released it early, we (Harald and I)
thought it would encourage people
1 - 100 of 1298 matches
Mail list logo
