On Feb 23, 3:48 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
Sage 2.10.2 has been released on February 23nd, 2008. It is available at
http://sagemath.org/download.html
SNIP
Those of you who want to bundle patches against 2.10.2 be warned that
currently the repo at
Hi Hector,
I just noticed that the binary downloads for sage-2.10.2 haven't been
updated, just the source code is available.
Best,
--
Hector
it always takes a while (roughly up to a day) for the binaries to be
build, tested and uploaded to the sagemath.org. So they should appear
this
Hello,
I am limiting myself to less than one email per day in this thread :)
On Feb 23, 2:58 pm, kcrisman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think, though I'm not sure, that mabshoff has perhaps misunderstood
my points, probably because my post was too long, for which I
apologize. As I said
On Feb 24, 3:05 pm, philt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sage -upgrade from 2.10.1 to 2.10.2:
I got a failure here:
Hi Phil.
Does this happen reproducibly? I assume you are on Linux, but which
distribution, CPU type, gcc and so on?
package /opt/sage-2.10/spkg/standard/linbox-20070915.p6.spkg
On Feb 24, 5:20 pm, danielbrst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello everyone
Hi,
I have somme difficults to run sage under microsoft vista.
when command notebook() is execute ,there is an error message :
please see the capture screen for indications at link
SNIP
While I have
local/lib/libcblas.so
Ok, is that $SAGE_LOCAL/local/lib ? The config test complains about a
missing cblas:
configure:24249: g++ -o conftest -g -fPIC -I/opt/sage-2.10/local/
include -I/opt/sage-2.10/local/include/linbox
-L/opt/sage-2.10/local/lib -g
On Feb 25, 4:49 pm, Joel B. Mohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed that the timeit short-cut seems more broken than normal (at
least I think this worked previous to 2.10.2:
sage: R.x=ZZ[]
sage: f=x^2-1
sage: timeit f.factor()
Hello folks,
I have started merging for 2.10.3.alpha0 for the last day or so, but
now I have run out of things to merge. The tickets with positive
review usually depend on things which have not been reviewed yet. So
if you have some time come one over to trac and review some tickets.
There are
On Feb 25, 11:07 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Carlo Hamalainen wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 6:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dirty, William. I can't believe you blame this on me -- that was all
Robert's fault. Anyway. I've co-opted Ajanki's framework, and
On Feb 25, 8:54 pm, mhampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My upgrade to 2.10.2 failed on an Intel mac running OS X 10.4.11.
The end of the log looks like:
making xdr.d from xdr.c
making xdr_float.d from xdr_float.c
making xdr_mem.d from xdr_mem.c
making xdr_stdio.d from xdr_stdio.c
gcc
On Feb 25, 9:53 pm, philt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In between the upgrade to 2.10.1 did you change anything like the gcc
version?
No
#define __LINBOX_CONFIGURATION
#include linbox/config-blas.h
int main ()
{
double a;
return 0;
}
If that work we have a problem
On Feb 26, 6:09 am, John Voight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got the same error message. I installed 2.10.2 fresh on a Ubuntu
x64, and after applying a patch and attempting to compile, it gave me
the error.
JV
Hi John,
apply the patch from #2180 and the issue should be fixed in your case.
On Feb 26, 6:45 am, Dan Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/26/0134235
Sage totally needs to get in on this! I figure Sage is far more worthy
than, say, Irssi [1]. :)
:)
We are on it - but input is always welcome.
Cheers,
Michael
Dan
On Feb 26, 8:04 am, Mike Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We should work on a wiki page with project ideas (assuming that Sage
will be accepted for SoC).
+1 see http://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoCSuggestions
--Mike
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to
apply cleanly against this alpha0 release.
The tarball [210 MB] can be found in the usual place:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-2.10.3/sage-2.10.3.alpha0.tar
It passes the long doctest for me, but please report any
build or doctest issues you encounter, assuming
Hello folks,
the rc1 release is finally out. Various old doctest failures, most new
patches got their failures fixed along the way. Instead of a deep
freeze I ended up merging quite some number of patches to stay on top
of things. Tarball is at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff
The merge goes on. 2.10.3.rc2 can be found at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-2.10.3/sage-2.10.3.rc2.tar
A sage.math binary for those interested in not
compiling all of Sage is at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-2.10.3/sage-2.10.3.rc2
On Mar 6, 8:39 pm, Bill Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bill,
Currently if I try to run valgrind on sage.math, it just says
permission denied. Is that intentional, or did the permissions get
screwed up somehow?
Bill.
Nope, that version has been disabled on purpose since it can't deal
On Mar 7, 8:53 am, Timothy Clemans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does one just add a bunch of documentation and make a patch and submit
it? Or does one make a bunch of Trac tickets and make a ton of
patches?
The idea is to add doctests. One would add doctests to one file or
directory of files
merge #1884.
Feel free to fix the various doctest failures. This is the base
build for Doc Day 2. The source build is at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-2.10.3/sage-2.10.3.rc3.tar
A binary for sage.math only is at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release
On Mar 10, 12:06 am, Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since they are still in that rc I should mention a couple of typos
that
I spotted in two spkg.
Hi Francois,
In linbox in the spkg-install file on line 41 we have an interesting
reference to ${SAGE_LCOAL}.
This is now #2458 and has
On Mar 23, 9:54 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 1:03 PM, mabshoff
SNIP
I put logs from all tests here:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/build/tests/2.11.alpha1/
Thanks, meccah's unusual failures are due to timeouts, some corrupted
GAP workspace
On Mar 24, 3:18 am, Alex Ghitza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On a Dual Core machine running Gentoo, I've tried
./sage -tp 1 devel/sage/sage
and
./sage -tp 2 devel/sage/sage
Both appeared to run fine; the first used only one core and the
doctester entirely for the
release of 2.11.
Thanks.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 5:02 PM, mabshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
Sage 2.11.alpha1 is out. It is a collection of various
fixes, nothing particular seems to stand out. We finally
pushed the updated
Hi David,
Rerunning sage -t yields all tests pass. I was reporting sage -tp.
I know ;)
Here is
a copy+paste from the terminal history:
sage -t 1/devel/sage/sage/misc/preparser.py
**
File preparser.py, line 83:
On Mar 24, 7:32 pm, Bill Furnish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could it be a Maxima pexpect issue?
I doubt it since there was only one thread running. The interesting
question is whether it is reproducible.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this
On Mar 25, 5:37 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(I'm taking this thread *off* the Cython lists and onto sage-devel
where it belongs.)
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Robert,
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Some of
On Mar 25, 9:42 pm, Soroosh Yazdani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
compiling fails for me on linbox. Apparently it can't find blas libraries.
My computer is an hp laptop, with amd 64x2 processor, running gentoo. I have
acml installed on my computer, although looking at install.log it seems
manipulations. By using glib algorithms I avoid having to
roll my own code that would require extensive manual review and
debugging. This code drop is big enough that Mabshoff would like a
formal +1 vote, and I'd be happy to address any concerns.
Mar 25 00:00:13 mabshoff yes. It isn't an spkg
On Mar 26, 2:58 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 22, 2008, at 16:02 , mabshoff wrote:
Hi folks,
Sage 2.11.alpha1 is out. It is a collection of various
fixes, nothing particular seems to stand out. We finally
pushed the updated experimental mayavi and vtl.spkg
Hello folks,
it seems that things have slowed down a little in Sage devel land due
to Easter and/or Spring Break. But there are still plenty of patches
in trac that deserve to be looked at and merged. While no hard date
has been set for the 2.11 release we should start winding down the
merges
On Mar 26, 5:45 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Hichael,
On Mar 25, 2008, at 19:16 , mabshoff wrote:
On Mar 26, 2:58 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 22, 2008, at 16:02 , mabshoff wrote:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release
On Mar 26, 3:25 am, Soroosh Yazdani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should I uninstall atlas if I want to check your patch for the future
version? Atlas is installed system wide on my computer, and linbox seemed to
have found those libraries as it compiled afterward. Is there a way to force
linbox
On Mar 26, 4:43 pm, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 24:27 , mabshoff wrote:
Ok, this is the culprit. It will need fixes all over the place and
this time we might as well do it right.
Oh, what the heck. Do it wrong for a couple of more times :-}
Poking
On Mar 26, 5:53 pm, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 09:15 , mabshoff wrote:
On Mar 26, 4:43 pm, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 24:27 , mabshoff wrote:
[snip]
Yeah, the culprit is the above regexp. I will fix those before
On Mar 26, 6:02 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is any of the code gpl v3+ only?
No.
How difficult will it be to update our version whenever upstream
changes? Do only you know how to do this?
Not particularly hard.
Why put this in c_lib instead of a separate spkg called
On Mar 26, 6:43 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:09 AM, mabshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 26, 6:02 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is any of the code gpl v3+ only?
No.
That's good.
How difficult will it be to update
On Mar 26, 7:53 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jason (or anybody),
Does anybody have a clue if it is possible to take a directory (e.g.,
devel/sage/) with an .hg repo directory
in it, and do the following:
(1) export everything in the .hg repo to something (perhaps a ton
On Mar 26, 8:12 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 1:18 PM, root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William,
git can do this. Since git uses a hash it will always regenerate the
same hash from the same file.
In fact, git uses hashes all the way down the
On Mar 26, 9:27 pm, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 11:53 AM, William Stein wrote:
Hi Jason (or anybody),
Does anybody have a clue if it is possible to take a directory (e.g.,
devel/sage/) with an .hg repo directory
in it, and do the following:
(1)
On Mar 26, 9:35 pm, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I was talking about something more sophisticated than export/import,
which won't work the instant one has multiple branches. One needs to
actually create multiple heads, apply patches, then resolve them. Hg
export doesn't
On Mar 26, 10:31 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Hi folks,
Sage 2.11.alpha1 is out. It is a collection of various
fixes, nothing particular seems to stand out. We finally
pushed the updated experimental mayavi and vtl.spkg.
[...]
#2493: Jaap Spies: Updated
5.8Gdmharvey
1.5Gekirkman
3.9Ggeorgesk
5.7Ggfurnish
20K Grammian
3.8Gjason
2.4Gjbmohler
1.7Gjec
7.3Gjen
1.1Gjetchev
1.3Gjipsen
3.3Gjkantor
6.0Gjvoight
1.1Gkathy
1.3Gkedlaya
1.4Gmabshoff
2.5Gmacaulay2
4.4Gmalb
1.7Gmanny
4.8G
On Mar 26, 10:53 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Well, maybe I did accidentally nuke more than the .svn directories. I
cannot imagine a scenario where anything would depend on the content
of a .svn directory to run. But I wouldn't be surprised to be proven
On Mar 27, 6:11 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:59:10 -0700, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 1:56 PM, mabshoff wrote:
On Mar 26, 9:35 pm, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I was talking about something more
SNIP
Furthermore, I intend to help
maintain the C algorithms. I fully intend to work on them actively if their
speed is not sufficient. Making a seperate spkg dramatically increases the
difficulty of active development.
Why??? I could have said the same about Pyrex two years ago, and
On Mar 27, 5:28 pm, bump [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 19, 1:27 pm, David Roe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This should be pretty easy (though multivariable Laurent series rings have
all kinds of issues associated with them). I don't have time to implement
it right now, but if nobody has
On Mar 28, 11:28 am, DuaneKaufman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am attempting to build Sage 2.10.4 om Mac OSX 10.3.9 (PPC), and have
run into an error building cremoz/eclib. The error output looks like:
SNIP
Any idea what to try next?
Hi Duane,
building Sage on OSX 10.3 is no longer
Hello folks,
this is 2.11.alpha2. It is a little later than I had hoped and
planned mostly due to the fact that Easter and Spring break
put somewhat of a damper on development. So far we merged 111
patches into this release.
There were fixes all over the map. This build should now also
build
On Mar 29, 3:11 am, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
Hello folks,
this is 2.11.alpha2. It is a little later than I had hoped and
planned mostly due to the fact that Easter and Spring break
put somewhat of a damper on development. So far we merged 111
patches into this release
On Mar 29, 5:26 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 7:11 PM, mabshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
this is 2.11.alpha2. It is a little later than I had hoped and
planned mostly due to the fact that Easter and Spring break
put somewhat
On Mar 29, 5:35 pm, Yi Qiang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, the tests passed fine but because twisted isn't thread safe and
I am abusing it in ways it was never intended there are some issues
with closing the thread. I'm installing Fedora Core 64bit right now
and see if I can reproduce it.
bad an 2.11.rc1.
The source tarball [195MB] is at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-2.11/sage-2.11.rc0.tar
The sage.math only build [282MB] is at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-2.11/sage-2.11.rc0-sage.math-only-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz
Time
Hello folks,
there have been a large, nebulous set of rules regarding how things
are done in trac, patch review and merging and the Sage development
process in general. Now I finally took the time to clear those up and
I put a *draft* of the guidelines up at
On Mar 30, 2:13 pm, Carlo Hamalainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 1:41 AM, mabshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
here we go with 2.11.rc0. Hopefully this will be identical
to the final 2.11 release. So please build, doctest and
report all issues you hit.
On 32bit
On Mar 30, 3:50 pm, David Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 30, 2008, at 6:31 AM, mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
there have been a large, nebulous set of rules regarding how things
are done in trac, patch review and merging and the Sage development
process in general. Now I
On a quick skim-read, I found the Sage Specific paragraph very
confusing. Are you trying to say that if someone makes up their own
version of Sage that ships different versions of packages to the ones
we normally ship, then they are on their own? Or something else?
david
One more
On Mar 31, 3:10 am, guez offtsing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use Suse enterprise server 9 sp2-ia64, below is the 'uname -a' result.
Linux linux 2.6.5-7.191-sn2 #1 SMP Tue Jun 28 14:58:56 UTC 2005 ia64
ia64 ia64 GNU/Linux
compiler is gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (SuSE Linux)
The first error was
On Mar 31, 3:10 am, guez offtsing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
/usr/include/g++/cmath:411: error: float std::log(float)
periods.cc: In function `NTL::RR G(int, NTL::RR)':
periods.cc:975: error: call of overloaded `log(int)' is ambiguous
/usr/include/bits/mathcalls.h:110:
On Mar 31, 1:53 pm, offtsing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'll try FLINT.And I have intel compiler 9.0 too, does it fit the c99
standard?
technically it does, though I am fairly certain that it won't work as
is with the way Sage is currently set up. So far nobody has attempted
to use the
Hello folks,
by now you are all familiar with the drill :)
Sage 2.11 is out and I already started merging tickets for Sage 3.0.
But there are plenty of unreviewed tickets sitting in trac waiting
patiently for somebody to take a look.
From the other perspective: If you have a patch sitting in
On Apr 1, 1:58 am, Dan Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just as a data point, I built 2.11 on the Ubuntu Hardy beta with
(almost) no troubles. I suppose this isn't anything too surprising,
since I don't think much changed with the compilers and so on.
I am seeing big problems with the
On Apr 1, 2:25 am, Yi Qiang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Parallel dsage doctesting simply will not work at this point and I am
not sure how to fix that yet. Is there a way to declare doctests so
they do not get executed in parallel? I imagine this functionality
might be useful for other
On Apr 1, 12:46 pm, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like a good idea, and certainly vastly better than my gp code
which was really only a toy.
I CC'ed this so sge-devel.
John
On 01/04/2008, Martin Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
let me (ab)use this
On Apr 1, 10:41 am, shreevatsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone else was trying to do something, and I tried something and got
a crash; mabshoff asked me to post a backtrace. (So if it is very
long, don't blame me ;-))
This is probably invalid mathematics that should raise an exception
On Apr 1, 8:58 am, root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Abshoff made that comment. He's motivated by wanting
to port Sage to a wide range of architectures and keep everything
maintainable, since he works incredibly hard on that. He suffers
a huge amount trying to deal with build issues
, but currently we cannot
declare pages as Spam (I think only robertwb and wstein, i.e. people
with admin power can). So I would suggest to add various people who
watch the wiki (mhansen, tclemans, mhampton, mabshoff and others who
would like to) to the admin group.
b) install a Captcha. This can
On Apr 1, 2:57 pm, Harald Schilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
b) install a Captcha.
+1
this one is good and usefulhttp://recaptcha.net/
c) Just like trac hand out account[s] ...
-1
Yeah. I forgot to mention that I consider this as a last resort type
of solution after (a) and (b) have
On Apr 1, 5:42 pm, philt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded sage-2.11.tar and did make on 2 machines, both 64-bit
Debian.
One went fine, make test is still running but seems ok.
The other make failed
install log:http://www.yobi.be/files/install.log.bz2(300k)
SNIP
You g++
On Apr 1, 5:57 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:52 AM, mabshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 1, 5:42 pm, philt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded sage-2.11.tar and did make on 2 machines, both 64-bit
Debian.
One went fine
On Apr 2, 3:32 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Alex Ghitza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Builds and tests without problems on 32-bit machine running Gentoo.
* Works on sage.math.
* integer.pyx
On Apr 2, 6:44 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Kohel wrote:
I learned of WIMS (http://wims.unice.fr/) by virtue of the
announcement of a new lecturer
position here in Luminy, who is supposed to be responsible for
computer-based teaching
with WIMS
Hello folks,
it has been a while since Bug Day 10. We also had two Doc Days and two
Sage Days since then, so that somewhat explains while there has been
relatively activity in this direction. But before anybody can announce
another Doc Day I would suggest doing Bug Day 11 on April 5th. The
usual
On Apr 3, 9:20 pm, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patch at #2653 whias was merged for 2.11 was supposed to fix this:
{{{
sage: k.a = GF(5^5)
sage: E = EllipticCurve(k,[2,4])
sage: M = E.cardinality(); M
3227
sage: type(M)
type 'sage.rings.rational.Rational'
}}}
I'm sure
number of functions: 19290
w00t! Sources and binaries in the usual space. This build will
be the basis of Bug Day 11 tomorrow.
Sources:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.0/sage-3.0.alpha1.tar
Binary:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.0
On Apr 5, 2:35 am, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
Hello folks,
here is Sage 3.0.alpha1. The bad news upfront: The gcc 4.3
compiler support didn't make it since the updated Singular
SPKG is delayed due to some bugs. Martin Albrecht is working
on it, so hopefully
On Apr 5, 3:52 pm, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John,
I only had two test failures after a successful build:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/prandom.py
sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/inline_fortran.py
In detail:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/prandom.py
On Apr 5, 5:43 pm, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got a compilation error on a macbook with OS10.4. However, it was
trying to compile a
version loaded on a firewire external drive, which may be the issue.
Anyway, the problem was with linbox and here is the tail:
ld: multiple
On Apr 5, 6:23 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
here is Sage 3.0.alpha1. The bad news upfront: The gcc 4.3
compiler support didn't make it since the updated Singular
SPKG is delayed due to some bugs. Martin Albrecht is working
on it, so hopefully
On Apr 5, 7:18 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
On Apr 5, 6:23 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
Hi Jaap,
sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/inline_fortran.py
Total time for all tests: 4476.2 seconds
tee: /test.log: Permission denied
grep: /test
On Apr 5, 10:02 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Scot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I just started working on a project to make Sage easier to use and
install under Windows. We're going to use Microsoft Virtual PC, but
before I get started
On Apr 6, 12:06 am, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 4, 2008, at 17:35 , mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
here is Sage 3.0.alpha1. The bad news upfront: The gcc 4.3
compiler support didn't make it since the updated Singular
SPKG is delayed due to some bugs. Martin
On Apr 6, 6:58 am, Nathan Dunfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ace-5.0.spkg for the GAP component is broken --- it tries to copy
itself into the non-existent directory of GAP version 4.4.9 instead of
the current 4.4.10. This is a one line fix to the spkg-install
file. I've put a fixed
a) make two Images, i.e. 32 and 64 bit, base on Ubuntu LTS 6.06, which
does not contain any GPL V3 code. You should not update anything but
sshd due to licensing issues. Install the minimal number of dev tools
needed to get Sage up and running
Oops, no 64 bit guest images for Virtual PC. Oh
On Apr 6, 6:36 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the notebook of sage-2.11:
time plot(1.0 - x * floor(1/x), (x,0.1,1.0)
CPU time: 143.77 s, Wall time: 1660.39 s
with a correct image.
Maple is almost immediate.
Even worse:
time plot(1.0 - x * floor(1/x), (x, 0.0, 1.0),
On Apr 6, 7:05 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
On Apr 6, 6:36 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the notebook of sage-2.11:
time plot(1.0 - x * floor(1/x), (x,0.1,1.0)
CPU time: 143.77 s, Wall time: 1660.39 s
with a correct image.
Maple
On Apr 6, 8:32 pm, Nick Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6-Apr-08, at 11:10 AM, Franco Saliola wrote:
Hello Mike (H),
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Mike Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not able to reproduce your bug. Here is what I get:
I am able to reproduce the bug
On Apr 6, 10:08 pm, Martin Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sunday 06 April 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've added some new reports to trac:
tickets needing review
tickets with positive review
tickets with negative review
tickets with patch
Of particular note, I've
4.3 fixes, the usual set of merges. Alpha3
should be out in the next 48 hours.
Sources and binaries are in the usual place:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.0/sage-3.0.alpha2.tar
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.0/sage-3.0.alpha2-sage.math
On Apr 7, 2:25 pm, David Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
david
Yeah, ran out of disc space. It is fixed now, but only a question of
time until it will happen again.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to
On Apr 7, 9:31 pm, Justin C. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 6, 2008, at 22:29 , mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
this is Sage 3.0.alpha2. Up to now we closed 111 tickets. But
things are still of alpha quality:
Sources and binaries are in the usual place:
http
toolchain
installed.
And with each alpha release in the sage-3.0 release cycle, I think
doc-main comes bundled with that alpha release and can be downloaded
from
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.0/
However, I only want to get the doc-main tree associated
installed.
[...]
I put releases together in /scratch/mabshoff/release-cycle, but that
directory is not exported to the web. The reason not to do builds in
$HOME is that all of those files end up being sync to the backup and I
see little benefit of all those files getting moved.
Thank you
in preparation. We will probably need some testing
of those patches.
Sources, binaries and documentation [due to special request]:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.0/sage-3.0.alpha3.tar
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.0/sage-3.0.alpha3
,
Alex
SNIP
Clement Pernet provided a patch for the LinBox on OSX 10.4 issue. The
updated spkg is at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.0/alpha4/linbox-1.1.5p2.spkg
In other news: The world hates me. The latest PolyBoRi is borken on
OSX 10.4 - see #2865. It appears
On Apr 9, 8:48 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
SNIP
On Fedora 7, 32 bits:
sage -t devel/doc/prog/prog.tex
[3.6 s]
sage -t devel/doc/const/const.tex
[27.6 s]
All tests passed!
Total time for all tests: 4129.4 seconds
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Apr 9, 8:40 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
SNIP
In other news: The world hates me. The latest PolyBoRi is borken on
OSX 10.4 - see #2865. It appears that stripping bundles on OSX 10.4 is
a bad thing. Since I wanted debugging support for PolyBoRi anyway I
will look
On Apr 10, 1:19 am, Yi Qiang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William forgot to CC sage-devel.
-- Forwarded message --
From: William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: use zip instead of 7zip for distributing the sage binary
To: Yi Qiang [EMAIL
Hi,
SNIP
I have no intention of starting a flame war either. :)
Instead of switching to to Winzip I would much rather use the Self-
extracting capability for 7z format of 7zip. Bandwidth is a finite
resource and I am not convinced that using some crappy old compression
technology is the
SNIP
I personally dislike the idea of extracting things as self-extracting
executables, both because I don't think people should get in the
habit of downloading and double-clicking on .exe files, and also
because it means the VM-ware image can't be (easily) accessed from
non-windows
501 - 600 of 2594 matches
Mail list logo
