On Jul 16, 8:39 pm, tkeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The last build I built from source (3.0.3) took ~ 3 hours total on my
average dell laptop (running kubuntu 8.0.4.1). Building 3.0.5 is
ongoing, but has spent the last 5+ hours on zn_poly tuning program.
Is this normal? It hasn't
(I am leaving for ECM in about an hour), but expect
steady progress on that front in 3.0.6. As usual please review patches
and spkgs since we have a boatload of them sitting in trac.
Sources and a binary for sage.math are in the usual place:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release
On Jul 16, 8:54 pm, tkeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Thomas,
I may have been imprecise. To clarify, zn_poly built, then displayed
this message:
Calibrating cycle counter... ok (3.84e+18)
KS mul: ...
KS sqr: ...
Nussbaumer mul:
Ok, here is what I found out last night:
* 3.0.3 runs the test 200 times without failing it once
* 3.0.4 with the new FLINT 1.0.13 fails 8 ought of 500 tests.
So we are given a couple possibilities:
* There is an algorithmic issue in ssmod somewhere or some
algorithmic issue got exposed
On Jul 17, 10:34 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, here is what I found out last night:
* 3.0.3 runs the test 200 times without failing it once
* 3.0.4 with the new FLINT 1.0.13 fails 8 ought of 500 tests.
So we are given a couple possibilities:
* There is an algorithmic
On Jul 18, 1:01 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John,
Following Ansrzej's report I tried the same thing. For me the test
always takes 2.0-2.1s but the 5th or 6th time I got the failure:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/modular/ssmod/ssmod.py
Hello folks,
we finally have working mirrors again, but since we moved a lot of
files around most mirrors not sage.math are still catching up since
they all have to mirror 28GB. Be patient and everything should be back
to normal in a day or two. Apologies for breaking the mirrors, I hope
it
Hi,
the following might be interesting for some people around here. As
time permits I will offer an optional spkg.
Cheers,
Michael
Original Message
Subject: [atlas-devel] ATLAS 3.9.0 LAPACK
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:19:10 -0500
From: Clint Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
mod p?
Some data points: I could never get valgrind to detect any problem
with ssmod.py, but since it took about 2200 seconds in sage.math for
one round that is not so surprising since the sample set was so small.
Cheers
Clement
Cheers,
Michael
mabshoff a écrit :
On Jul 17, 10:34 pm
On Jul 18, 12:33 pm, Harald Schilly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Harald,
Hello Sage folks, as promised in my last website posting [1], here a
bit more how things evolved.
nice work and thanks for your continued efforts.
First, since there is some tracking going on, and I have a bit more
On Jul 18, 3:59 pm, Clement Pernet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip I have applied the patch and rebuild LinBox and started running the
test 500 times to see. Can you guess if/how much this patch does
affect performance for charpoly mod p?
For the dimensions you are considering (and up to a
On Jul 19, 8:16 am, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
due to the ssmod and the gfe2 bug in Sage we really want to have a
stable release out by Wednesday when William gives his talk at ISSAC.
Since we don't want to cut it too short that means that I just
On Jul 19, 7:24 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When you say Any new ticket should be a real blocker I presume you
only actually mean tickets asking for resolution before 3.1.1? I
recently created a new ticket which can certainly wait until 3.1.1
(it's not even a bug, but a new
On Jul 19, 3:39 pm, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 6:10 PM, q10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello:
It has come to my attention that SAGE does not have a units-conversion
program component (maybe it has; if it does, please show me). I
recommend adding the
On Jul 20, 12:20 am, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jul 19, 2008, at 7:09 AM, mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
Hi,
due to the ssmod and the gfe2 bug in Sage we really want to have a
stable release out by Wednesday when William gives his talk at ISSAC.
Since we don't want
On Jul 19, 10:01 am, Andrzej Giniewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
after some sniffing around, I noticed that for me (see bottom of mail
for gcc version) techyon needs to be compiled with make linux (with
disabled threads) or with -fno-crossjumping -fno-reorder-blocks
added to Make-arch
On Jul 20, 8:20 am, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 4:48 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
SNIP
BTW, here is another creepy thing, that maybe is a bug in Sage:
$ gedit
gedit: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2: undefined symbol: gzopen64
On Jul 20, 9:21 am, Simon Beaumont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
I am just about to embark on integrating come CUDA libraries into
sage. I was not sure of the best route to go - I am considering the
pycuda libraries as a starting point - this a pure kernel approach - I
but would also
On Jul 20, 9:43 am, Dr. David Kirkby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jul 20, 10:03 am, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi David,
Ok, we had some discussions off list about Solaris support in general
and back then the possibility of setting up a Sparc with Solaris 8
came up, so I could
On Jul 19, 11:53 pm, Dr. David Kirkby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jul 19, 11:38 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Jul 19, 2:45 am, Dr. David Kirkby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 18 Jul, 20:33, Harald Schilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
12) Once a Solaris port
On Jul 20, 11:20 am, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 6:38 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
Hi Ondrej,
But even then it will only be a question of time until something else
blows up. That is why I strictly refuse to support Sage being used
On Jul 20, 3:27 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:59 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 20, 2:39 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi folks,
Hi Vincent,
Looking at the way that sage builds and installs its packages, I
On Jul 20, 2:39 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi folks,
Hi Vincent,
Looking at the way that sage builds and installs its packages, I
didn't see an easy way to remove an optional package (say in case it
breaks something, or you don't need it anymore) ; has it been
On Jul 20, 9:13 pm, Timothy G Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tim,
Below I list a large number of trivial problems in the Sage 3.0.5
distribution tarball that the Debian automatic package checking tools
detected.
None of the problems below have any functional effect, they're just things
On Jul 20, 4:21 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
OK, so who knows a clever way to detect which files were added/changed
in a directory structure?
Quick and very dirty : 'find . -cmin -5' (files modified less than 5
minutes ago).
Not even close :). There are packages
On Jul 21, 1:35 pm, Andrzej Giniewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi Andrzej,
some new informations, gcc 4.2.4 is also affected by this, but all gcc
= 4.2.3 are for sure working right, for 4.2.4 and 4.3.1 tachyon
segfaults, I'm looking for some live cd with gcc 4.3 to see if problem
is
Hello folks,
this is 3.0.6.rc0 which should be the last release before the ISSAC
2008 special 3.0.6 release for Wednesday. We fixed a bunch of issues
and were a little less conservative than I though, but what could go
wrong ;)
Sources are at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff
Thanks Tim for opening the tickets. For the record those are #3686 -
$3690.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options,
On Jul 22, 1:29 am, Thierry Dumont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Francesco Biscani a écrit :
With the non-header-only Boost libraries (such as Boost.Python), a
possible approach could be that of modifying the build system of a
package that uses them to compile and link the needed Boost
On Jul 21, 6:18 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Vincent,
Quick and very dirty : 'find . -cmin -5' (files modified less than 5
minutes ago).
Not even close :). There are packages that install in less than 10
seconds.
That one was a joke, of course. I have used it
On Jul 22, 6:07 am, karakas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Here is part of install.log (I have set over more or less
sensitive, or boring information):
GCC Version
gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i586-suse-linux/3.3.5/specs
Configured with: ../configure
On Jul 21, 7:44 pm, Timothy G Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tim,
I figured I'd give everyone an update on how things are going with the
Sage packages. I believe (but am not certain) that all of the Sage
dependencies that I want to get into Lenny will make it, though I'm still
waiting
, python, ATLAS, numpy 1.1.1, scipy SVN and hg if
you left me know the CPU target you want. I have to offer Sparc US
IIIi, Core2 Quad SSE or Opteron.
So, mabshoff -- Solaris port +1.
Me too wanting that.
3.0.6 contains about five Solaris build fixes, so the list is getting
shorter. We mainly did
On Jul 22, 8:12 am, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 22, 6:07 am, karakas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Here is part of install.log (I have set over more or less
sensitive, or boring information):
GCC Version
gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i586-suse
On Jul 22, 11:48 am, David Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 22, 2008, at 12:35 PM, David Harvey wrote:
SNIP
This seems to have been fixed already in 3.0.5. Sorry for the noise.
david
Hi David,
we reverted to the old gmp 4.2.1 spkg in 3.0.5 since the only reason
to upgrade was to
On Jul 22, 2:55 pm, Simon Beaumont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
I decided to have a play with the pycuda-0.90.2 kit for which I needed
boost_1_35_0
Mhh, is 1.35.0 mandatory? We might have to upgrade boost in PolyBoRi
then.
- the main caveat is to make sure boost is using the sage
On Jul 22, 10:17 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brandon
Speaking of Matlab, I was able to get version r2008a (most recent
version) working in a linux-2.6 zone using the CentOS 5 distribution.
I then installed RPyC 3.00 RC1 (http://rpyc.wikispaces.com/)
Interesting, I had
On Jul 22, 10:18 am, karakas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Chris,
Thank you very much for the clear and fast answer. Since upgrading gcc
will probably mean an upgrading of glibc too, which will mean a
recompilation/upgrade of the whole system,
gcc 3.4.6 or 4.0.2 (or is .3 the last one?) will
On Jul 24, 12:11 pm, Bill Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then again if that is so, it is recorded here incorrectly:
http://sagemath.org/packages/standard/
Then again I think SAGE uses FLINT 1.0.13 by now, so that's not up-to-
date either.
Bill.
The FLINT upgrade is in 3.0.6.rc0, so it
On Jul 25, 5:11 am, Martin Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi there,
Hi Martin,
my patch at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3324
is held back by a libPNG problem on OSX, particulary the spkg-install contains
the following code:
if [ `uname` = Darwin -a $SAGE64 = yes ];
Hi folks,
after a long, long time we want to do another Doc Day this Sunday.
William won't be around, but that should not stop us. The goal should
be to review patches and also write a bunch of new doctests since one
of the goals this year is to get up to 100% doctests this year.
Thoughts?
On Aug 18, 10:37 am, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Martin Albrecht
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah I see thanks. I used some other spkg package as a template.
Which one? It needs to be fixed :-)
Yes :)
Well, some unofficial one:
An appropriate amount of time has passed and I consider this a
positive vote for the inclusion of GHMM into Sage.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On Aug 18, 1:20 pm, bourbabis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everybody.
Everything is in the title. The install log :
http://download69.mediafire.com/fzzdvb2dymmg/mykrpj3thu6/install.log.bz2
Thanks.
Hi,
this is the same problem as you reported last time. For some reason
some part of
On Aug 19, 12:12 am, Stan Schymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Stan,
As mentioned before, the sage -upgrade from sage 3.0.5 did not work
for me, but a fresh compilation of the sage-3.1.1.tar into a new
directory worked fine on my PowerBook Pro 2.4 GHz with os 10.4.11. I
am trying it out
Hello folks,
I would like to suggest a Buh Day for this Saturday, August 23rd,
2008. We will start at 10 am PST and go on until the last person is
exhausted.
If you plan to participate please add youself to http://wiki.sagemath.org/bug13
Cheers,
Michael
On Aug 20, 7:40 am, Dr. David Kirkby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 16 Aug, 23:18, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please build and test, a final source release should be out tonight.
Hi Dave
I thought the Solaris specific fixes were planned for 3.1, but I see
polybori-0.3.1.p4 still fails
On Aug 21, 9:44 pm, Dr. David Kirkby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
SNIP
Yeah, unfortunately loads of things got bumped from the 3.1 release
due to time constraints and Sage Days 9 also did not help too much. I
am merging build fixes into 3.1.2 and so far have mostly done 64 bit
OSX fixes.
On Aug 25, 1:45 am, Thierry Dumont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I try to compile sage on my opteron machine.
When compiling flint, I get the ld error message:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lstdc++
Th ld lines are:
g++ -I/usr/local/sage-3.1/local/include/
+1 from me to include Pynac/GiNaC in Sage,
Martin Albrecht asked about the Windows porting issue: I looked at the
GiNaC code and it is very clean C++. The maintainer is willing to
merge MSVC related patches where needed, i.e. export statements for
the symbols we need. I am not aware of any other
On Aug 25, 11:50 pm, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I think it's just about getting people to fix it. There are many
people around who can fix Python/Cython and a little less (I guess)
who can fix C++ and C. But a lot less who can fix lisp.
As I mentioned before, another
On Aug 26, 12:34 am, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Well, Sage developers like Python, Cython and C while Maxima
developers like lisp (at least for the low level stuff) - so we are
having self selecting groups here. It is the best tool for the job,
but also the devil you
On Aug 26, 1:27 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:19 AM, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
qepcad relies on an aging library saclib for the algebraic data
structures. It would be a worthwhile project to implement CAD/port
qepcad so that it
On Aug 23, 11:04 am, Mike Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
Hi Mike,
While we continue to add tests to the notebook code, there are some
things that we just can't test directly in Python such as browser
interactions / Javascript / etc. Luckily, there is a nice software
package
Hi,
at #258 Pablo De Napoli has posted an spkg for gp2c. It is tiny (about
500kb) and is considered useful by many people. It is a tool to
translated pari code to C code that in turn can be linked to the pari
library. Since that is a rather old ticket that has been sitting
around it is now
will see in the morning what blew up :)
Sources are available in
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.1.2/
Cheers,
Michael
Merged in Sage 3.1.alpha1:
#1539: William Stein: bdist of sage should include devel/doc [Reviewed
by Michael Abshoff]
#2000: Martin Albrecht
Hello folks,
space is getting right again on sage.math's home partition. I will
post a list with the hard drive space consumption winner later on
today (PST), so this is a possibility to clean up before I post the
list of winners :)
Cheers,
Michael
In general note that #3813 (the new adaptive plotting code) slows down
a lot of doctests since we end up creating plots with a lot more
points, but much better quality. Mike Hansen has an idea how to fix
that performance issue, but there is no ticket yet. Even with his
_fast_float fixes the slow
On Aug 27, 12:32 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 5:42 AM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
It fails to build for silly reasons on iras and cleo (our itaniums):
checking target system type... ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
checking for a BSD-compatible
On Aug 27, 2:23 pm, Igor Tolkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I prefer Google Docs, since I don't know the wiki code very well.
I think, the most logical approach is to enumerate most of the notebook
functionality, as well as notebook-related bugs that are open or have been
closed in recent
On Aug 27, 9:56 pm, Arnaud Bergeron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/27 John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Arnaud,
Since this bugged me (I did the adaptive rendering thing) I timed the
doctests for plot.py on my machine:
sage 3.1.1 vanilla
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/plot/plot.py
On Aug 27, 8:57 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two build reports. Both built fine, but a few doctest failures:
Hi John,
1. Linux version 2.6.24-19-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)) #1 SMP Fri Jul 11 23:41:49 UTC 2008
The following tests
On Aug 27, 11:12 pm, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
Hi Minh,
I'm assuming that the correct benchmark URL is
http://www.sagemath.org:9001/graph_benchmark
Is this correct?
Yes, at some point the wiki moved to its own domain and then the
domain was moved to a different host.
On Aug 27, 11:35 pm, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Michael,
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 6:24 AM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Yes, at some point the wiki moved to its own domain and then the
domain was moved to a different host. All sage.math:9001 urls should
now
On Aug 28, 4:59 am, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:33 PM, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
Hi,
--
The following tests failed:
sage -t
Hello folks,
fortunately the number of ticket with unreviewed patches has dropped
from 100+ to around 40 at the moment. But if you look at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/10
there are still 41 open tickets with patches waiting for review. So if
you have some spare cycles to burn
On Aug 28, 5:17 am, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying:
G.show(frame_aspect_ratio=[Integer(1),Integer(1),Integer(1)/Integer(2)])###
line
893:_sage_ G.show(frame_aspect_ratio=[1,1,1/2])
Expecting nothing
after maybe a minute. Imho 1 minute for one test is way
On Aug 28, 9:24 am, Arnaud Bergeron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/28 mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Arnaud,
Thanks for tracking this down. Please open a new ticket and attach the
patch to it.
We generally attempt to avoid reopening tickets or adding patches to
tickets that were
On Aug 28, 6:30 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:22 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
Yeah, the above looks odd. Maybe William can tell us what is happening
here.
I think the above is just numerical noise. The Viterbi algorithm
On Aug 28, 2:32 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Simon Beaumont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
got a rather weird one - os x 10.5.2 sage 3.1.1 (binary build) I am
trying to build boost (python) for this version on os x - so I can get
pycuda
On Aug 28, 1:18 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
On Aug 28, 9:18 am, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jaap,
I guess sailing season this year is coming to an end :)
Not yet! I'll go on until the end of October. BUt there have been some
problems
On Aug 28, 1:20 pm, Stephen Hartke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Stephen,
I've added my Python binding for nauty into Jason Grout's optional nauty
spkg. (Jason: I hope that's okay. Since the extension needs to include
nauty and link against it, it seems simplest to include it in one package.)
two separate compilings be done?
Others (mabshoff?) can comment on what to do about -fPIC. However, my
guess is that using sed at spkg install time is probably not a good
idea, or at least not in line with official practices. It seems that
the official way to change the makefile is to store
Hello folks,
September 1st is around the corner and we wanted to hit 60% coverage
by the end of August. The current coverage in my alpha2 merge tree is
Overall weighted coverage score: 57.2%
Total number of functions: 20912
and Mike Hansen is writing doctests for all the expect
On Aug 29, 2:24 am, Nils Skoruppa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
Hi Nils,
I cannot explain why this works, but if you want to have a
look:http://hg.countnumber.de/fqm-devel/file/98bb736f0c07/cn_group/finite_...
(and then line 2132 class
(unless we remove some dead
code), so this is certainly an ambitious goal.
Sources are at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.1.2/sage-3.1.2.alpha2.tar
and a sage.math only binary is at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.1.2/sage-3.1.2
On Aug 29, 3:58 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/29 chris wuthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I wonder if a user can change the colours on the trac pages for
patches. Being green-red colour-blind, I would prefer to swap, say,
green for blue.
+1 from another red-green
On Aug 29, 7:09 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Build reports for 3.1.2.alpha2
Hi John,
32-bit still running
64-bit on
Linux version 2.6.18.8-0.3-default ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)) #1 SMP Tue Apr 17 08:42:35
UTC 2007
Build ok,
On Aug 29, 10:16 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/29 mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi John,
Thanks for testing - let's hope 32 bit goes well, too.
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/stats/hmm/chmm.pyx
sage -t devel/sage/sage/stats/hmm
On Aug 29, 12:31 pm, bnewbold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got pretty frustrated setting up vmware (workstation, have a license
through school) under Ubuntu linux for the purpose of building a
FreeBSD development image; lots of license issues, networking was a
pain to configure, and
On Aug 29, 2:34 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philippe Saade wrote:
Hi dev team,
Some of you know that wednesday and thursday i made an official
presentation of Sage at the Maths' Teachers' Summer School (French
Educational System).
Notebook ended up on TV (well 3
On Aug 29, 4:52 pm, Carl Witty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 29, 4:36 pm, Philippe Saade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
after many discussion with Sage potential users (this week, around
me), i get convinced that it would be great to use Blender Python APi
to rendre 3D scenes
On Aug 28, 3:43 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
September 1st is around the corner and we wanted to hit 60% coverage
by the end of August. The current coverage in my alpha2 merge tree is
Overall weighted coverage score: 57.2%
Total number of functions: 20912
On Aug 29, 7:42 pm, Martin Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi there,
Hi Martin,
I've got a couple of questions about Doc Day 3. Who is attending? There
doesn't seem to be Wiki page for it.
At least William, Mike Hansen, rlm and me will meet physically in
Seattle. We will probably do a
On Aug 29, 7:57 pm, Jason Merrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jason,
I tried to install pynac on OS X 10.5, but it died. Here's an excerpt
of install.log
pynac-0.1
Machine:
Darwin jmerrill.local 9.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 9.4.0: Mon Jun 9
19:30:53 PDT 2008;
Hi,
I guess due to lack of interest we will make gp2c an optinal.spkg. I
need to investigate how that works out, but since I want to upgrade
pari anyway to the latest release I can integrate those changes needed
for gp2c in its spkg-install.
Cheers,
Michael
On Aug 30, 2:36 am, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
SNIP
Hi Jaap,
Where have I seen this before?
the same issue hit your box before and we ended up filtering some non-
ascii characters out of the stream. I will dig for the ticket and see
what is turning up.
Jaap
Hi,
while looking for code to doctest Mike Hansen came across sage/libs/
pari/functional.py It is a file with 191 one line functions that
attempt to do things like the following:
def FOO(x): return pari(x).FOO()
There is no user of the code, the only file that imports it is bg.py
which is
Hi Chris,
Mike Hansen and I changed the green to blue in the diff view for
patches. Could you let us know if this is better for you?
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
On Aug 31, 7:44 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John,
Build report 1: on the 64-bit machine
Linux version 2.6.18.8-0.3-default ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)) #1 SMP Tue Apr 17 08:42:35
UTC 2007
I have three all-new failures:
On Aug 31, 3:33 pm, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Built fine on amd64 hardy heron but the test for benchmark.py failed.
Do you want me to post it? It was similar to the output John posted.
Hi David,
I don't think we will need it. The Maple issue is now #4025 and I will
post a patch
Hi,
as it turned out about 6 people contributed doctest patches while a
number of other people dropped by and did some other work. So in total
I would call it a success, especially since we reached 59.9% coverage
and with some of the patches posted, but not reviewed in time for
3.1.2 we will
On Aug 31, 4:33 pm, Martin Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sunday 31 August 2008, John Cremona wrote:
SNIP
Hi there, that means that I screwed up 32-bit compatibility. I'll look into it
tomorrow.
This is now #4027.
Note that on OSX in addition the following happens too:
Hi,
this is a followup to the above thread. Mike Hansen wrote a doctest
for gp.py and we hit the following problem:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/gp.py
**
File /Users/mabshoff/sage-3.1.2.alpha3/tmp/gp.py, line 522
On Aug 31, 8:57 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
Doc Day 3 went well and we barely missed the goal of 60% coverage with
59.9%. Tomorrow we will merge a couple more patches from the que and
will surpass the August 2008 goal. Aside from the doctesting
Hello folks,
the end of the 3.1.2 release cycle is near - at least the point where
we will only merge bug fixes or even critical bug fixes. So if you
have things sitting in trac waiting to make it in please find somebody
to review the patch. Please also make sure that the positively
reviewed
On Sep 2, 6:43 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John,
I hope I didn't kill #1115's chances by relabelling it from a bug fix
to an enhancement, since I didn't just fix the bug...
Nope, code from that area is high level and usually does introduce no
failures that are platform
On Sep 2, 9:20 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Build reports
Hi John,
32-bit: just the already known failures:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/stats/hmm/chmm.pyx
sage -t devel/sage/sage/stats/hmm/hmm.pyx
sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/gp.py
on Linux
On Sep 3, 10:46 am, Arnaud Bergeron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Arnaud,
hg diff in spkg/base gives the diff at the bottom in a just-extracted
sage-3.1.2.alpha4. Should this repository be ignored or is this just
an oversight?
Oops, those scripts get copied from the local/bin repo and are
In German from heise.de:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/MuPAD-verschwindet-aber-nur-als-Produktname--/meldung/115390
the gist:
* MuPAD will only be sold until September 28th 2008
* MuPAD (Pro) licenses will remain valid
* MuPAD will be available as part of the symbolic Matlab toolbox
*
901 - 1000 of 2594 matches
Mail list logo
