[sage-devel] Bug in .subgroup?

Hello, to me it seems that with 10.3 there might be a bug in ".subgroup", see example below. The subgroup cardinality is wrong and the equality test of the group and the subgroup generated by all group elements yields "False". In previous versionls of SAGE this worked as expected. Can anybody

Re: [sage-devel] (coding) Syndrome tables over root fields

Dear Vincent, thank you for your suggestions! For me, working as a Sage developer is not a question of interest, but a question of time... Currently, I will not be able to contribute in this regard. Best regards Barbara -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

[sage-devel] (coding) Syndrome tables over root fields

Dear Sage-Developers, I came across the following issue / feature request when working with the coding theory classes: Getting a syndrome table of a code over GF(9) works, but using a 'hand-crafted version' of GF(9) will not work, although(?) the available decoders include 'Syndrome'. See the

Re: [sage-devel] Two issues about the coding theory method "weight_enumerator"

Thank you for replying and submitting a ticket so promptly! Barbara Am Freitag, 14. Juli 2017 11:39:29 UTC+2 schrieb David Joyner: > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Johan S. H. Rosenkilde > wrote: > > Thanks a lot for reporting! We *really* appreciate any feedback from >

[sage-devel] Two issues about the coding theory method "weight_enumerator"

Dear Sage-Developers, I'd like to report two issues that I came across when working with the coding theory classes of SAGE. 1. The Sage Reference Manual: Coding Theory, Release 7.6 [1] explains on p. 31: weight_enumerator [...] This is the bivariate, homogeneous polynomial in 푥