Travis Scrimshaw writes:
>> While it is arguably too rigid to say that this is "senseless" (as I
>> wrote in the subject),
>
> You already did that, and because you started off calling them "senseless,"
> you have polluted this issue with your heavily loaded question. That is
> unfair and
> Compared to Sage 8.0, matrices in Sage 8.1.beta1 now have a host of new
> methods:
>
> - leading_coefficient
> - leading_item
> - leading_monomial
> - leading_support
> - leading_term
>
> These are inherited from the category of finite dimensional modules with
> basis of
Hi Johan,
On 2017-08-18, Johan S. H. Rosenkilde wrote:
> My question here is whether it is really intended that all matrices get
> stuck with these (almost) senseless methods?
I didn't introduce them, but I believe it would be quite useful for my
applications (provided it is