Re: [sage-devel] Second round poll for H1 a specific guideline for writing docstrings

2017-05-19 Thread Vincent Delecroix
+1 On 19/05/2017 00:17, Kwankyu Lee wrote: Hi, I prepared H1 revised from G1 based on your ideas and wishes. It was hard to make a compromise from your differing opinions and reach a proposal for the better. So this time* if I fail to get approval from most of you, the guideline will be simply

Re: [sage-devel] Second round poll for H1 a specific guideline for writing docstrings

2017-05-19 Thread Johan S . H . Rosenkilde
+1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-devel] Second round poll for H1 a specific guideline for writing docstrings

2017-05-19 Thread Daniel Krenn
On 2017-05-19 00:17, Kwankyu Lee wrote: > I prepared H1 revised from G1 based on your ideas and wishes. It was > hard to make a compromise from your differing opinions and reach a > proposal for the better. So this time_if I fail to get approval from > most of you, the guideline will be simply

Re: [sage-devel] Second round poll for H1 a specific guideline for writing docstrings

2017-05-18 Thread Jori Mäntysalo
On Thu, 18 May 2017, Kwankyu Lee wrote: So this time if I fail to get approval from most of you, the guideline will be simply discarded.   I am strongly against discarding the guideline(s). If we have no common view, I suggest that we make a poll (LimeSurvey or similar) and tell it