Sorry if I never got around to dealing with all the patches.
I'm will to look at it again, if someone is willing to spell it all out for
me :-)
On Thursday, May 26, 2016 at 10:55:25 AM UTC-4, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
> I tried to do archeology once for this one and found nothing conclusive...
>
On 05/27/16 02:55, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
I tried to do archeology once for this one and found nothing conclusive...
I think inspection of #852 is fairly conclusive although the final word
on the matter would rest on singular devs as they are the one the patch
was stolen from.
http://trac.sa
I tried to do archeology once for this one and found nothing conclusive...
By the way, I've forwarded all of our patches/hackery to Victor Shoup some
monthes/years ago and he said he'll try to integrate them.
Maybe it's time to politely ask once again about what has not been
integrated (e.g. shi
That’s old… After digging it looks like the first version of this is from #852.
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/commit/02f6f87b554a6abebc9963076a00b7a48a4580b6
François
> On 26/05/2016, at 21:46, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> There is build/pkgs/ntl/patches/new_singular.patch that changes a macro
There is build/pkgs/ntl/patches/new_singular.patch that changes a macro
(expanding to new rather than to new(std::nothrow)), and it is said to be
related to Singular, without details or a link to a trac ticket.
Where can I read more on this?
Thanks,
Dima
--
You received this message because y
