[sage-devel] Re: Background documentation

2014-08-09 Thread mmarco
I have seen much worse than two pages of boring computations of errir estimates that lead to potentially useful code published in arxiv. I would go for that. El viernes, 8 de agosto de 2014 10:48:20 UTC+2, Clemens Heuberger escribió: In http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16782, I propose a patch

[sage-devel] Re: Background documentation

2014-08-08 Thread Nils Bruin
On Friday, August 8, 2014 1:48:20 AM UTC-7, Clemens Heuberger wrote: Is there any canonical place for such background documentation, possibly within the sage source tree? If your work is interesting then you'll probably be doing computations with it that warrant publication. That could