Re: [sage-devel] Re: Can I build Sage via MacPorts under MacOS 10.9?
Aha – thank you! I will start playing with this... – Louis On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 12:17:56 PM UTC-4 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 4:53 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 3:09 AM Louis Deaett > wrote: > > > > > > Many thanks for the word of encouragement, and also for pointing me to > that ticket. I was not even familiar with tox, to be honest, so I read up > on its intended purpose. > > > > > > I can see that the source for Sage 9.7 that I have here has a tox.ini > file, but inside there is no reference to MacPorts. Is that because the > MacPorts environments alluded to in the thread (the one you linked) haven't > been merged into the release branch of Sage? > > > > > > After further digging, I did notice this branch: > > > > > > > https://github.com/sagemath/sagetrac-mirror/tree/u/mkoeppe/tox_ini__add_macports_environment > > > > > > It looks like it hasn't seen any commits in almost a year. But is that > still my best starting point? Shall I pick up and work with this, or has > this effort been abandoned? > > > > indeed, no work had been done since. > > A good starting point would be to take it rebased over the latest > develop, here: > > > https://github.com/dimpase/sage/pull/new/u/mkoeppe/tox_ini__add_macports_environment > > Oops, I meant to post this: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35667 > (same branch, as a PR) > > > > HTH > > Dima > > > > > > > > > > Many thanks again! > > > > > > – Louis > > > > > > > > > On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 2:42:19 PM UTC-4 John H Palmieri wrote: > > >> > > >> In principle this should work. See > https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/31505 for some relevant > information. Others might have direct experience with it. > > >> > > >> On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 11:24:07 AM UTC-7 Louis Deaett wrote: > > >>> > > >>> I'm interested in Sage development (and contributing some > enhancements) and so I'd like to be able to build the current release (and > ultimately the development branch) from source. > > >>> > > >>> I am running macOS 10.9 (Mavericks) because that is what I prefer, > and because some of my hardware tops out at that version. Anyway, I've had > decent success getting open-source software up and running under MacPorts, > which has good support for 10.9 (and even earlier). > > >>> > > >>> So I've been working on building Sage from source using MacPorts. > Compilation seems to go smoothly with MacPorts LLVM tools, but I've run > into some snags whereby the build for some SPKGs seems to get gummed up > when it can't locate some of the libraries or headers provided by MacPorts. > By its nature, this hasn't felt like an insurmountable problem. > > >>> > > >>> Still, while I can keep hacking away at this, I figured I should > ask: Is there any fundamental reason why what I'm trying to do should be > impossible? > > >>> > > >>> If there are major barriers in my path with this that I'm just not > encountering yet or just haven't realized, then it would (of course) help > me out to know. > > >>> > > >>> For what it's worth, if building under MacPorts is theoretically > possible but would require some additional effort on the Sage side, then > that's something I'd be willing to contribute to, if anything comes out of > my own efforts. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks in advance for any advice! > > >>> > > >>> -- Louis > > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "sage-devel" group. > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to sage-devel+...@googlegroups.com. > > > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/5a8f7076-fcb4-462d-8c48-a7b1c7fea26dn%40googlegroups.com > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/5fddf3e4-2de2-4634-a48c-b91eff3c660an%40googlegroups.com.
Re: [sage-devel] Re: Can I build Sage via MacPorts under MacOS 10.9?
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 4:53 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 3:09 AM Louis Deaett wrote: > > > > Many thanks for the word of encouragement, and also for pointing me to that > > ticket. I was not even familiar with tox, to be honest, so I read up on > > its intended purpose. > > > > I can see that the source for Sage 9.7 that I have here has a tox.ini file, > > but inside there is no reference to MacPorts. Is that because the MacPorts > > environments alluded to in the thread (the one you linked) haven't been > > merged into the release branch of Sage? > > > > After further digging, I did notice this branch: > > > > https://github.com/sagemath/sagetrac-mirror/tree/u/mkoeppe/tox_ini__add_macports_environment > > > > It looks like it hasn't seen any commits in almost a year. But is that > > still my best starting point? Shall I pick up and work with this, or has > > this effort been abandoned? > > indeed, no work had been done since. > A good starting point would be to take it rebased over the latest develop, > here: > https://github.com/dimpase/sage/pull/new/u/mkoeppe/tox_ini__add_macports_environment Oops, I meant to post this: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35667 (same branch, as a PR) > > HTH > Dima > > > > > > Many thanks again! > > > > – Louis > > > > > > On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 2:42:19 PM UTC-4 John H Palmieri wrote: > >> > >> In principle this should work. See > >> https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/31505 for some relevant > >> information. Others might have direct experience with it. > >> > >> On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 11:24:07 AM UTC-7 Louis Deaett wrote: > >>> > >>> I'm interested in Sage development (and contributing some enhancements) > >>> and so I'd like to be able to build the current release (and ultimately > >>> the development branch) from source. > >>> > >>> I am running macOS 10.9 (Mavericks) because that is what I prefer, and > >>> because some of my hardware tops out at that version. Anyway, I've had > >>> decent success getting open-source software up and running under > >>> MacPorts, which has good support for 10.9 (and even earlier). > >>> > >>> So I've been working on building Sage from source using MacPorts. > >>> Compilation seems to go smoothly with MacPorts LLVM tools, but I've run > >>> into some snags whereby the build for some SPKGs seems to get gummed up > >>> when it can't locate some of the libraries or headers provided by > >>> MacPorts. By its nature, this hasn't felt like an insurmountable problem. > >>> > >>> Still, while I can keep hacking away at this, I figured I should ask: Is > >>> there any fundamental reason why what I'm trying to do should be > >>> impossible? > >>> > >>> If there are major barriers in my path with this that I'm just not > >>> encountering yet or just haven't realized, then it would (of course) help > >>> me out to know. > >>> > >>> For what it's worth, if building under MacPorts is theoretically possible > >>> but would require some additional effort on the Sage side, then that's > >>> something I'd be willing to contribute to, if anything comes out of my > >>> own efforts. > >>> > >>> Thanks in advance for any advice! > >>> > >>> -- Louis > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "sage-devel" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/5a8f7076-fcb4-462d-8c48-a7b1c7fea26dn%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAAWYfq2WYs3c5KrkLDvF3shcoL5%3D9KuPeLjvDJmtSn%2BR%3DuS7Og%40mail.gmail.com.
Re: [sage-devel] Re: Can I build Sage via MacPorts under MacOS 10.9?
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 3:09 AM Louis Deaett wrote: > > Many thanks for the word of encouragement, and also for pointing me to that > ticket. I was not even familiar with tox, to be honest, so I read up on its > intended purpose. > > I can see that the source for Sage 9.7 that I have here has a tox.ini file, > but inside there is no reference to MacPorts. Is that because the MacPorts > environments alluded to in the thread (the one you linked) haven't been > merged into the release branch of Sage? > > After further digging, I did notice this branch: > > https://github.com/sagemath/sagetrac-mirror/tree/u/mkoeppe/tox_ini__add_macports_environment > > It looks like it hasn't seen any commits in almost a year. But is that still > my best starting point? Shall I pick up and work with this, or has this > effort been abandoned? indeed, no work had been done since. A good starting point would be to take it rebased over the latest develop, here: https://github.com/dimpase/sage/pull/new/u/mkoeppe/tox_ini__add_macports_environment HTH Dima > > Many thanks again! > > – Louis > > > On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 2:42:19 PM UTC-4 John H Palmieri wrote: >> >> In principle this should work. See >> https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/31505 for some relevant information. >> Others might have direct experience with it. >> >> On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 11:24:07 AM UTC-7 Louis Deaett wrote: >>> >>> I'm interested in Sage development (and contributing some enhancements) and >>> so I'd like to be able to build the current release (and ultimately the >>> development branch) from source. >>> >>> I am running macOS 10.9 (Mavericks) because that is what I prefer, and >>> because some of my hardware tops out at that version. Anyway, I've had >>> decent success getting open-source software up and running under MacPorts, >>> which has good support for 10.9 (and even earlier). >>> >>> So I've been working on building Sage from source using MacPorts. >>> Compilation seems to go smoothly with MacPorts LLVM tools, but I've run >>> into some snags whereby the build for some SPKGs seems to get gummed up >>> when it can't locate some of the libraries or headers provided by MacPorts. >>> By its nature, this hasn't felt like an insurmountable problem. >>> >>> Still, while I can keep hacking away at this, I figured I should ask: Is >>> there any fundamental reason why what I'm trying to do should be impossible? >>> >>> If there are major barriers in my path with this that I'm just not >>> encountering yet or just haven't realized, then it would (of course) help >>> me out to know. >>> >>> For what it's worth, if building under MacPorts is theoretically possible >>> but would require some additional effort on the Sage side, then that's >>> something I'd be willing to contribute to, if anything comes out of my own >>> efforts. >>> >>> Thanks in advance for any advice! >>> >>> -- Louis > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/5a8f7076-fcb4-462d-8c48-a7b1c7fea26dn%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAAWYfq3rVthyNYcef68YJ%3D%2BUDGsDB7nKkzJavPfgpL%2BR6FHdEg%40mail.gmail.com.
[sage-devel] Re: Can I build Sage via MacPorts under MacOS 10.9?
Many thanks for the word of encouragement, and also for pointing me to that ticket. I was not even familiar with tox, to be honest, so I read up on its intended purpose. I can see that the source for Sage 9.7 that I have here has a tox.ini file, but inside there is no reference to MacPorts. Is that because the MacPorts environments alluded to in the thread (the one you linked) haven't been merged into the release branch of Sage? After further digging, I did notice this branch: https://github.com/sagemath/sagetrac-mirror/tree/u/mkoeppe/tox_ini__add_macports_environment It looks like it hasn't seen any commits in almost a year. But is that still my best starting point? Shall I pick up and work with this, or has this effort been abandoned? Many thanks again! – Louis On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 2:42:19 PM UTC-4 John H Palmieri wrote: > In principle this should work. See > https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/31505 for some relevant > information. Others might have direct experience with it. > > On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 11:24:07 AM UTC-7 Louis Deaett wrote: > >> I'm interested in Sage development (and contributing some enhancements) >> and so I'd like to be able to build the current release (and ultimately the >> development branch) from source. >> >> I am running macOS 10.9 (Mavericks) because that is what I prefer, and >> because some of my hardware tops out at that version. Anyway, I've had >> decent success getting open-source software up and running under MacPorts, >> which has good support for 10.9 (and even earlier). >> >> So I've been working on building Sage from source using MacPorts. >> Compilation seems to go smoothly with MacPorts LLVM tools, but I've run >> into some snags whereby the build for some SPKGs seems to get gummed up >> when it can't locate some of the libraries or headers provided by >> MacPorts. By its nature, this hasn't felt like an insurmountable problem. >> >> Still, while I can keep hacking away at this, I figured I should ask: Is >> there any fundamental reason why what I'm trying to do should be impossible? >> >> If there are major barriers in my path with this that I'm just not >> encountering yet or just haven't realized, then it would (of course) help >> me out to know. >> >> For what it's worth, if building under MacPorts is theoretically possible >> but would require some additional effort on the Sage side, then that's >> something I'd be willing to contribute to, if anything comes out of my own >> efforts. >> >> Thanks in advance for any advice! >> >> -- Louis > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/5a8f7076-fcb4-462d-8c48-a7b1c7fea26dn%40googlegroups.com.
[sage-devel] Re: Can I build Sage via MacPorts under MacOS 10.9?
In principle this should work. See https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/31505 for some relevant information. Others might have direct experience with it. On Friday, May 5, 2023 at 11:24:07 AM UTC-7 Louis Deaett wrote: > I'm interested in Sage development (and contributing some enhancements) > and so I'd like to be able to build the current release (and ultimately the > development branch) from source. > > I am running macOS 10.9 (Mavericks) because that is what I prefer, and > because some of my hardware tops out at that version. Anyway, I've had > decent success getting open-source software up and running under MacPorts, > which has good support for 10.9 (and even earlier). > > So I've been working on building Sage from source using MacPorts. > Compilation seems to go smoothly with MacPorts LLVM tools, but I've run > into some snags whereby the build for some SPKGs seems to get gummed up > when it can't locate some of the libraries or headers provided by > MacPorts. By its nature, this hasn't felt like an insurmountable problem. > > Still, while I can keep hacking away at this, I figured I should ask: Is > there any fundamental reason why what I'm trying to do should be impossible? > > If there are major barriers in my path with this that I'm just not > encountering yet or just haven't realized, then it would (of course) help > me out to know. > > For what it's worth, if building under MacPorts is theoretically possible > but would require some additional effort on the Sage side, then that's > something I'd be willing to contribute to, if anything comes out of my own > efforts. > > Thanks in advance for any advice! > > -- Louis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/80e85248-fefa-4b47-a35c-c3f526677b8en%40googlegroups.com.
