I took a quick look at that link and it looks brilliant to me. Just
this afternoon Francis Clarke and I were saying how nice it would be
to have something just like this, and I observed that there was
probably someone in the Sage community clever enough to do it. Were
you reading my mind?
John
Wow. This is amazing and great that you did this!
Thanks very much Mike.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:06 AM, Mike Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I played around a bit with Epydoc this morning and was able to get it
to produce semi-decent output for Sage (by explicitly importing
On Jul 17, 2008, at 6:06 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
Hello all,
I played around a bit with Epydoc this morning and was able to get it
to produce semi-decent output for Sage (by explicitly importing
sage.all at the top of the epydoc script). You can find the
documentation at
The weirdness seems to appear when the default for a parameter is None.
What extra magic would cause the latex parts of the docstrings to be jsmath'ed ?
John
2008/7/17 David Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Jul 17, 2008, at 6:06 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
Hello all,
I played around a bit with
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Mike Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I played around a bit with Epydoc this morning and was able to get it
to produce semi-decent output for Sage (by explicitly importing
sage.all at the top of the epydoc script). You can find the
documentation
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:53 AM, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The weirdness seems to appear when the default for a parameter is None.
Yeah, I'm not exactly sure why it's doing that.
What extra magic would cause the latex parts of the docstrings to be
jsmath'ed ?
There are two
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Mike Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4) Ran the following command epydoc --html -o sage-epydoc sage
Sorry about the double post, but you'll want to add a
--docformat=plaintext option in there as well.
--Mike
