Just to throw a number around: There are *157* tickets with patches
and that is an all time high.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 06:22:10PM -0800, kcrisman wrote:
possible since in 3.3 we will convert the docstrings to ReST. This
will likely break most patches not merged into 3.2.1.
snip
around here is telling you what to do, but since the ReST transition
will be painful otherwise please
Hi David,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 5:05 AM, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this an implicit request to help with the sphinxification of tut.tex,
inst.tex, prog.tex, const.tex? If so, I'd need further guidance.
Those are already done. He was just saying that when we convert all
of
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:56 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
now that 3.2 is out I have started building the 3.2.1.alpha0 merge
tree. There are copious amounts of patches sitting in trac and we
really ought to get as many merged of them in 3.2.1 as humanly
possible since
On Nov 21, 4:55 am, Gabriel Gellner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 06:22:10PM -0800, kcrisman wrote:
SNIP
I'm sorry if this is described somewhere, but I couldn't figure out
where that would be located. A sample of before and after
docstrings would be very helpful,
possible since in 3.3 we will convert the docstrings to ReST. This
will likely break most patches not merged into 3.2.1.
snip
around here is telling you what to do, but since the ReST transition
will be painful otherwise please consider that into your plans.
I've been looking at the
On Nov 20, 6:22 pm, kcrisman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
possible since in 3.3 we will convert the docstrings to ReST. This
will likely break most patches not merged into 3.2.1.
snip
around here is telling you what to do, but since the ReST transition
will be painful otherwise please
