Re: [sage-devel] Re: TOO LONG!

2010-01-24 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:29:07AM -0800, mhampton wrote: On Jan 21, 1:03 pm, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote: 500s is too long for a doctest to take with sage -t -long, especially since on sage.math with a healthy number of threads, this one doctest will take as long as the rest of

Re: [sage-devel] Re: TOO LONG!

2010-01-24 Thread William Stein
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:29:07AM -0800, mhampton wrote: On Jan 21, 1:03 pm, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote: 500s is too long for a doctest to take with sage -t -long, especially since on sage.math

[sage-devel] Re: TOO LONG!

2010-01-21 Thread mhampton
Well then perhaps we should have a -very_long flag! I would think that some very long doctests stress-test things in a way that may be impossible with shorter tests - large memory usage for example. -Marshall On Jan 21, 1:03 pm, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote: On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at

Re: [sage-devel] Re: TOO LONG!

2010-01-21 Thread Robert Miller
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:29 AM, mhampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote: Well then perhaps we should have a -very_long flag!  I would think that some very long doctests stress-test things in a way that may be impossible with shorter tests - large memory usage for example. -Marshall +1! --

[sage-devel] Re: TOO LONG!

2010-01-19 Thread Robert Miller
PS - sorry for shouting in the subject :) On Jan 19, 1:54 pm, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote: It's time to point our fingers at long doctests again. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to