[sage-devel] Re: What happened to Mathematica magics ?

Done here . ​ Le mercredi 1 mars 2023 à 19:57:42 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit : > Yes, please create a new issue. You can cc me, but I don't know the best > way to fix it. > > I saw the other issue (that %lsmagic isn't helpful by default), but

[sage-devel] Re: What happened to Mathematica magics ?

Yes, please create a new issue. You can cc me, but I don't know the best way to fix it. I saw the other issue (that %lsmagic isn't helpful by default), but fortunately "%" works. It would be great to fix this, too. On Wednesday, March 1, 2023 at 12:09:41 AM UTC-8 Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:

[sage-devel] Re: What happened to Mathematica magics ?

Thank you for the explanation. The short-term fix works, but is noisy. Furthermore, it seems that it *must* be executed at toplevel : wrapping it in a function and calling this function doesn't work. So including it in a startup file doesn't seem reasonable. The issue you pointed has been

[sage-devel] Re: What happened to Mathematica magics ?

I think it's due to https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/34547. That ticket was created because with the old behavior in Sage, instance of Octave(), Mathematica(), etc. were created when Sage started up, regardless of the availability of the corresponding software. Once those became lazy