[sage-devel] Re: doc.sagemath.org gone from google

2016-10-20 Thread Paul Masson
Searching for Sage on Google was hit-and-miss for me yesterday but much more consistent today. It apparently takes time for all Google servers to sync their search results and may take a couple more days to appear consistently. On Thursday, October 20, 2016 at 6:36:07 PM UTC-7, kcrisman wrote:

[sage-devel] Re: doc.sagemath.org gone from google

2016-10-20 Thread kcrisman
On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 6:24:17 PM UTC-4, Paul Masson wrote: > > In case no one else has noticed, doc.sagemath.org is now showing up in > Google searches, including the link that initiated this thread. > > Google taketh away, and Google giveth back. > >> >> Boy, I sure hope you are

Re: [sage-devel] Re: doc.sagemath.org gone from google

2016-10-20 Thread Johan S . H . Rosenkilde
> In case no one else has noticed, doc.sagemath.org is now showing up in > Google searches, including the link that initiated this thread. Indeed I have noticed! It's really good news for us and - especially - for new Sage users :-) Best, Johan Paul Masson writes: > In case no one else has

[sage-devel] Re: doc.sagemath.org gone from google

2016-10-20 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2016-10-20 00:24:17 UTC+2, Paul Masson: > doc.sagemath.org is now showing up in Google searches, > including the link that initiated this thread. Hoorray! This is great news for all SageMath users. Thanks Paul and Harald for your efforts to make it happen. And thanks to anyone else involved (eg

[sage-devel] Re: doc.sagemath.org gone from google

2016-10-19 Thread Paul Masson
In case no one else has noticed, doc.sagemath.org is now showing up in Google searches, including the link that initiated this thread. Google taketh away, and Google giveth back. On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 8:25:56 AM UTC-7, William wrote: > > I'm googling for links to the sage reference

[sage-devel] Re: doc.sagemath.org gone from google

2016-08-17 Thread Paul Masson
Harald got access to the server hosting combinat.sagemath.org and added a server-side redirect to the corresponding documents on doc.sagemath.org. Hopefully that will speed up the indexing by Google of the new documentation location. On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 8:25:56 AM UTC-7, William

[sage-devel] Re: doc.sagemath.org gone from google

2016-08-10 Thread leif
William Stein wrote: > I'm googling for links to the sage reference manual, e.g., > > >

[sage-devel] Re: doc.sagemath.org gone from google

2016-08-07 Thread Paul Masson
As I understand them canonical URLs distinguish between the same content accessed through different URL forms. Currently Google thinks the documentation is mostly located at www.sagemath.org/doc/ while we want it to appear at

[sage-devel] Re: doc.sagemath.org gone from google

2016-08-07 Thread Harald Schilly
Yes, you are right, this sounds like a really good idea! -- h On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > Presumably Google decided that combinat is the canonical url, right? > Hiding combinat is only kicking the problem down the road, there are > presumably

[sage-devel] Re: doc.sagemath.org gone from google

2016-08-07 Thread Volker Braun
Presumably Google decided that combinat is the canonical url, right? Hiding combinat is only kicking the problem down the road, there are presumably many copies of the Sage docs hosted somewhere. The correct solution would be to include a http://doc.sagemath.org/path/to/help.html"/> in our docs

[sage-devel] Re: doc.sagemath.org gone from google

2016-08-07 Thread Harald Schilly
Btw, try http://www.bing.com/search?q=sage+Elements+of+Quotients+of+Univariate+Polynomial+Rings https://yandex.ru/search/?text=sage%20Elements%20of%20Quotients%20of%20Univariate%20Polynomial%20Rings

[sage-devel] Re: doc.sagemath.org gone from google

2016-08-07 Thread Harald Schilly
Does anyone know who is administrating the combinat pages? Hiding those pages could help. Besides that, I'm working with Paul Masson for months now to fix these indices. It's a stubborn problem, though... -- h On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 5:25 PM, William Stein wrote: > I'm