I thought PY_NEW was to be avoided (except for classes overriding tp_new).
See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17668 and
https://github.com/cython/cython/wiki/FAQ#can-cython-create-objects-or-apply-operators-to-locally-created-objects-as-pure-c-code
On Sunday, April 8, 2018 at 9:41:17 AM UTC+2,
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> I thought PY_NEW was to be avoided (except for classes overriding tp_new).
> See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17668 and
> https://github.com/cython/cython/wiki/FAQ#can-cython-create-objects-or-apply-operators-to-locally-created-object
Dear all,
In order to get algebraic polyhedra using the normaliz backend [1], we
modify the function
number_field_elements_from_algebraics of qqbar.py to give embedded number
fields and also accept a larger class of algebraic numbers, say coming from
cyclotomic fields [2].
For example, this i
Hi Jeroen,
Not posting on python-ideas for now since this is a more 1-on-1
message and I don't want to add to the noise there.
I've read your PEP a few times now, and some of the discussion on
Python-ideas, and I think it all pretty much makes sense to me. The
one thing I keep questioning is wh
Have we come to any conclusions on what steps should be taken after this
topic? What seems to be the concensus? Or, at the very least, could someone
give a listing of the options we have so that we can give it a poll or
something similar?
On Monday, April 2, 2018 at 2:58:36 AM UTC-5, Sebastian
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 8:12 PM saad khalid wrote:
> Have we come to any conclusions on what steps should be taken after this
> topic? What seems to be the concensus? Or, at the very least, could someone
> give a listing of the options we have so that we can give it a poll or
> something similar?