I'll forward this to sage-nt where you might find someone who knows what
this is about.
On Tuesday, June 23, 2020 at 3:18:21 PM UTC+1, Alex G wrote:
>
> Hi Sage developers,
>
> I'm one of the Summer of Code students. I'm looking for feedback about my
> design and implementation of the Berkovich
Yes. Sorry Martin. I mixed things up.
Martin knows of the problem. He reacted in the thread.
Jaap
On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at 11:58:14 AM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, 10:34 Jaap Spies, >
> wrote:
>
>> This was me on sagerelease. Starting with sage-9.1.beta1
Great, glad that we didn't lose the ARM trail. Not that I'm necessarily
looking forward to upgrading ... but I bet a lot of our "customers" will!
Thanks for all your replies.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from
Some weeks ago, there was a post on this list (or an other sage list)
where somebody said he succeeded compiling sage on a Raspberry 4... so...
t.
Le 23/06/2020 à 14:11, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
> Sage used to work on ARM chips, we stopped testing on it due to lack of
> hardware in 2015 or so.
>
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 7:21 AM Thierry Dumont
wrote:
>
> Some weeks ago, there was a post on this list (or an other sage list)
> where somebody said he succeeded compiling sage on a Raspberry 4... so...
> t.
these are underpowered for the job, but one can get e.g.
This was me on sagerelease. Starting with sage-9.1.beta1 fplll failed.
According to Bill Hart they never test on ARM.
Jaap
On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at 8:21:48 AM UTC+2, tdumont wrote:
>
> Some weeks ago, there was a post on this list (or an other sage list)
> where somebody said he
On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, 10:34 Jaap Spies, wrote:
> This was me on sagerelease. Starting with sage-9.1.beta1 fplll failed.
> According to Bill Hart they never test on ARM.
>
fplll bug tracker is here:
https://github.com/fplll/fplll/issues
In the past they dealt with ARM bugs.
Please file yours
See ticket: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29091
Jaap
On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at 11:34:40 AM UTC+2, Jaap Spies wrote:
>
> This was me on sagerelease. Starting with sage-9.1.beta1 fplll failed.
> According to Bill Hart they never test on ARM.
>
> Jaap
>
>
> On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at
# Some SageMath / ARM related links
## Conda on ARM
- Miniforge provides Conda on ARM
https://github.com/conda-forge/miniforge/
## Discussions
- sage-release, 2020-01-26, Jaap Spies, Dima Pasechnik, Martin Albrecht
On Raspberry Pi, Sage 9.1.beta0 builds but Sage 9.1.beta1 does not,
2020-06-24 10:09:50 UTC, Jaap Spies:
>
> Martin knows of the problem. He reacted in the thread.
I opened this issue:
https://github.com/fplll/fplll/issues/432
It might be possible to use GitHub actions to test on ARM.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
And I missed this Sage Trac ticket:
- Build failure of fplll-5.3.2 on Raspbian Buster (ARM)
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29091
where the fplll issue is discussed.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this
11 matches
Mail list logo
