I agree with Dima that 2 days is not enough time to gather feedback. Is
there any reason for the quick turnaround time?
David
P.S. I'm sorry about disappearing from the other thread about disputed
PRs. I will try to summarize the discussion on that thread and call for a
vote shortly.
On Sat,
The time scale is too tight for people who don't work on weekends (or don't
work on Sage 5 days a week) to react, this is the main objection.
I think this needs more discussion, more detailed than just TBD, TBD proposal,
and can wait for the next round, on April 15.
There are a number of
On Saturday, January 13, 2024 at 1:19:52 PM UTC-5 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
I think we need to know at least some rough indication on the intended
timeline of this proposed process.
My offer would be that I get it started (i.e. serve as the editor on the
first batch of disputed tickets). Others
On Sunday, January 14, 2024 at 9:07:07 AM UTC-8 David Roe wrote:
Is there any reason for the quick turnaround time?
Yes, it is motivated by the current crisis of abuse and misconduct in the
community.
Our project will benefit from engaging closely with projects and
organizations that have
To add more details on the history of the (non) application,
during OpenDreamKit years, and after,
the intention was to use a to be
established European branch of NumFocus, hence the endless delays
The branch didn't get established, as far as I know.
Dima
On Sunday, January 14, 2024 at 1:55:29
On 14 January 2024 23:21:51 GMT, Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
>On Sunday, January 14, 2024 at 1:50:04 PM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>PS. The question whether an attempt to sneak the NumFocus application
>through the back door without a proper community consultation is a
>violation of our CoC
On Sunday, January 14, 2024 at 1:50:04 PM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
PS. The question whether an attempt to sneak the NumFocus application
through the back door without a proper community consultation is a
violation of our CoC is left as a homework for the readers.
Thanks for sharing this
I already pointed out that our project will certainly benefit from being more
like successful Python systems, e.g. how they don't vendor compilers and a good
portion of PyPI packages.
CoCs are a nice cherry on the tart, yes.
PS. The question whether an attempt to sneak the NumFocus application
