Re: [sage-devel] On backdooring open source projects

This also seems like a good time to reiterate an old comment of mine: https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/Dq83PiiCAsU/m/RKSpD9_rDQAJ ...pasted below for your convenience. On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 04:04:31 +0100, Lorenz Panny wrote: > On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 14:41:27 +0100, Michael Orlitzky >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 1:51 PM Matthias Koeppe wrote: > David, none of this explains the misleading use of the word "unreviewed". I believe that it does. If there was confusion, hopefully this exchange can help clarify it for others. David > On Thursday, April 18, 2024 at 10:47:36 AM UTC-7

Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 11:54 AM David Roe wrote: > > Hi all, > Sage has had a review process for over 15 years, but a combination of recent > changes has led to the merging of a PR into sage-10.4.beta3 of a change > (#36964) that I believe should not (yet) have been merged. In #37796 I >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies

David, none of this explains the misleading use of the word "unreviewed". On Thursday, April 18, 2024 at 10:47:36 AM UTC-7 David Roe wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 1:43 PM Matthias Koeppe > wrote: > >> I will first note that the title of this post is misleading. >> Everything that was

[sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies

I will first note that the title of this post is misleading. Everything that was merged has been reviewed -- as noted, many months ago. On Thursday, April 18, 2024 at 8:54:26 AM UTC-7 David Roe wrote: > Hi all, > Sage has had a review process for over 15 years, but a combination of > recent

Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 1:43 PM Matthias Koeppe wrote: > I will first note that the title of this post is misleading. > Everything that was merged has been reviewed -- as noted, many months ago. > I agree that everything was reviewed. However review refers not only to the action of giving

[sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies

+1, yes, the unintended merge should be reverted. Martin On Thursday 18 April 2024 at 17:54:26 UTC+2 David Roe wrote: > Hi all, > Sage has had a review process for over 15 years, but a combination of > recent changes has led to the merging of a PR into sage-10.4.beta3 of a > change (#36964

Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies

On Thu, 2024-04-18 at 11:54 -0400, David Roe wrote: > I am therefore asking you to vote (+1 means merge #37796 > in order to revert #36964 > ). +1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies

+1 to reverting the wrong merge On 18 April 2024 16:54:08 BST, David Roe wrote: >Hi all, >Sage has had a review process for over 15 years, but a combination of >recent changes has led to the merging of a PR into sage-10.4.beta3 of a >change (#36964 )

[sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies

+1 to merge #37796. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit

[sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies

Hi all, Sage has had a review process for over 15 years, but a combination of recent changes has led to the merging of a PR into sage-10.4.beta3 of a change (#36964 ) that I believe should not (yet) have been merged. In #37796

Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies

+1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit

[sage-devel] Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project)

Dear all: As an alternative to the proposal to back out the PR https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36964 whose *disputed dependency PR https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36676 which had not reached the required 2:1 supermajority *of the dispute-resolution process *(it currently only has

Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies

-1 If something has been done that should be undone, I very much trust Volker to take care of it when he can, without the need for endless time-consuming discussions and votes. Best, Guillermo On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 17:54, David Roe wrote: > Hi all, > Sage has had a review process for over

[sage-devel] sagemath-10.4 beta3

I can't build it any more : ubuntu 24.04 ryzen 9 9700x 24 threads It used to build to version beta 1 but since no way  ! I build it on manajaro I build it on wsl2 any help ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from

Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies

On Thursday, April 18, 2024 at 12:47:36 PM UTC-5 David Roe wrote: On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 1:43 PM Matthias Koeppe wrote: I will first note that the title of this post is misleading. Everything that was merged has been reviewed -- as noted, many months ago. I agree that everything was

Re: [sage-devel] Urgent and important: Please vote on disputed PR #36964 (next step of the modularization project)

Another attempt at derailing the ongoing vote, not unexpected. Besides, Matthias must be really the greatest democrat of all - 1st he blocks a part of electorate from voting at the designated venue, and then invite everyone to vote there. I urge everyone to ignore this alternative vote - to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Revert merged PR with unreviewed dependencies

-1 to be in sync with my vote in #37796. On Friday, April 19, 2024 at 5:35:57 AM UTC+9 Marc Culler wrote: > > > On Thursday, April 18, 2024 at 12:47:36 PM UTC-5 David Roe wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 1:43 PM Matthias Koeppe wrote: > > I will first note that the title of this post is

[sage-devel] Re: sagemath-10.4 beta3

Sorry I forget error message r /home/pi/sage/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.12/var/lib/sage/scripts/cypari/spkg-requirements.txt (line 1)) [cypari-2.1.5] [spkg-pipinst] Requirement already satisfied: cysignals>=1.7 in

[sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization

Works fine with system singular 4.3.2.p16 too, so this may be a bug in that particular Singular version. El jueves, 18 de abril de 2024 a las 6:02:53 UTC+2, Kwankyu Lee escribió: > No problem with Singular 4.3.2 included in sage (on mac). -- You received this message because you are