Re: [sage-devel] 7.4 release: please don't have fpylll build-depend on Sage

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Ximin Luo wrote: > Jeroen Demeyer: >> On 2016-10-18 17:52, Ximin Luo wrote: >>> (2) In the long run, one can think about splitting out sage.rings.integers >>> (and related things) into a small library "sage-types" or something like >>>

Re: [sage-devel] 7.4 release: please don't have fpylll build-depend on Sage

Thanks a lot! 'Martin R. Albrecht' via sage-devel: > Hi all, > > this is now https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21728 > > Cheers, > Martin > -- GPG: ed25519/56034877E1F87C35 GPG: rsa4096/1318EFAC5FBBDBCE https://github.com/infinity0/pubkeys.git -- You received this message because you are

Re: [sage-devel] 7.4 release: please don't have fpylll build-depend on Sage

Jeroen Demeyer: > On 2016-10-18 17:52, Ximin Luo wrote: >> (2) In the long run, one can think about splitting out sage.rings.integers >> (and related things) into a small library "sage-types" or something like >> that. Then sagelib and fpylll can depend on this, and there would be no >>

Re: [sage-devel] 7.4 release: please don't have fpylll build-depend on Sage

Very much appreciated Martin! Since this ticket doesn’t touch sagelib Gentoo, Debian and other distributions will be able to use fpylll-0.23 directly in sage-7.4. I’ll issue a revision of the sage-7.4 ebuild tomorrow and review the ticket if no one has done it by then. François > On 19/10/2016,

Re: [sage-devel] 7.4 release: please don't have fpylll build-depend on Sage

Hi all, this is now https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21728 Cheers, Martin Martin R. Albrecht writes: > Hi there, > > Ximin Luo writes: >> We can do "pre-install tests" with Sage 7.3, by doing a "dummy >> install" using Sage's Makefiles, running the tests here, then >> installing them to the

Re: [sage-devel] 7.4 release: please don't have fpylll build-depend on Sage

On 2016-10-18 17:52, Ximin Luo wrote: (2) In the long run, one can think about splitting out sage.rings.integers (and related things) into a small library "sage-types" or something like that. Then sagelib and fpylll can depend on this, and there would be no circular dependency, even when

Re: [sage-devel] 7.4 release: please don't have fpylll build-depend on Sage

Hi there, Ximin Luo writes: > We can do "pre-install tests" with Sage 7.3, by doing a "dummy > install" using Sage's Makefiles, running the tests here, then > installing them to the "real location". (This requires some patching, > but we have achieved this already and it works.) However with Sage

Re: [sage-devel] 7.4 release: please don't have fpylll build-depend on Sage

Jeroen Demeyer: > On 2016-10-18 17:52, Ximin Luo wrote: >> One straw-man way to resolve this is to move the tests into a separate >> Debian package "sagemath-distribution". > > I still think that this is the real solution, also because it mimics what > Sage does: within the

Re: [sage-devel] 7.4 release: please don't have fpylll build-depend on Sage

On 2016-10-18 17:52, Ximin Luo wrote: One straw-man way to resolve this is to move the tests into a separate Debian package "sagemath-distribution". I still think that this is the real solution, also because it mimics what Sage does: within the Sage-the-distribution build system,

Re: [sage-devel] 7.4 release: please don't have fpylll build-depend on Sage

Here is another solution, but it involves upstream fpylll. I'm not sure how realistic it is, because of the auto-generated config.pxi: (3) Ship the Cython-generated files with fpylll. This moves the dependency on Sage from build-time to packaging-time. -- You received this message because

[sage-devel] 7.4 release: please don't have fpylll build-depend on Sage

Hi, we're trying to package Sage 7.4 for Debian and are running into a difficulty. This will affect not just Debian, but all buildsystems / distributions that want to (1) run tests at build-time, before installation and (2) don't allow extra installations or network access *during* the build of