[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-24 Thread mmarco
There is no /dev/shm in my android system. Could it be that this is the problem? If so, is there any hope of solving it? -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-24 Thread mmarco
Nevermind, it worked by mounting an empty tmpfs as shm device On 24 abr, 18:07, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote: There is no /dev/shm in my android system. Could it be that this is the problem? If so, is there any hope of solving it? -- To post to this group, send an email to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-24 Thread Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
Em 24 de abril de 2012 13:46, mmarco mma...@unizar.es escreveu: Nevermind, it worked by mounting an empty tmpfs as shm device Good to know the real issue :-) My workaround only works for missing /dev/shm. Missing /dev/pts on build chroots I managed to bug at Mandriva sometime ago, to get it

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-23 Thread mmarco
Ok, switching to a newer version of ubuntu solved the eclib problem. Now i have another one. Building the sage package i get this error message: Building modified file sage/ext/interpreters/wrapper_el.pyx. Executing 296 commands (using 4 threads) Traceback (most recent call last): File

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-23 Thread Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
Em 23 de abril de 2012 16:54, mmarco mma...@unizar.es escreveu: Ok, switching to a newer version of ubuntu solved the eclib problem. Now i have another one. Building the sage package i get this error message: Building modified file sage/ext/interpreters/wrapper_el.pyx. Executing 296 commands

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-23 Thread John Cremona
On 23 April 2012 20:54, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote: Ok, switching to a newer version of ubuntu solved the eclib problem. I did not report back to you but there is now a new eclib spkg at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10993 John Now i have another one. Building the sage package

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-23 Thread mmarco
I did not look very closely at a related issue in chroot'ed builds in x86, but it should be possible to make python multiprocessing use some other approach like pipes in these conditions. What I did to get sage to build in the Mandriva build system was to backport the previous logic for a

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-23 Thread leif
On 24 Apr., 00:23, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote:   I did not look very closely at a related issue in chroot'ed builds in x86, but it should be possible to make python multiprocessing use some other approach like pipes in these conditions. What I did to get sage to build in the Mandriva

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-23 Thread leif
On 24 Apr., 02:36, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote: On 24 Apr., 00:23, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote:   I did not look very closely at a related issue in chroot'ed builds in x86, but it should be possible to make python multiprocessing use some other approach like pipes in these

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-11 Thread mmarco
I have finally downloaded the file, and it doesn't run on my tablet. It seems that it was compiled in a different setup. I have changed to a newer version of ubuntu, and will try to compile from source. John, is your new version of eclib available as an spkg? -- To post to this group, send an

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-11 Thread John Cremona
On 11 April 2012 18:51, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote: I have finally downloaded the file, and it doesn't run on my tablet. It seems that it was compiled in a different setup. I have changed to a newer version of ubuntu, and will try to compile from source. John, is your new version of eclib

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-10 Thread John Cremona
On 10 April 2012 05:20, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote: On 7 Apr., 23:55, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote: I have a new autotools-based release of eclib, which will be turned into a new spkg after the weekend, and with luck that will settle some build issues. Nice.  No more

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-10 Thread Julien Puydt
Le mardi 10 avril, John Cremona a écrit: If you are interested in taking a look, it is at http://homepages.warwick.ac.uk/staff/J.E.Cremona/ftp/progs/ (NB not yet an spkg) I configure-d, make-d and make check-ed it on x86_64 and on ARM : no problem (and out of tree). I had a look at the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-10 Thread Julien Puydt
Le samedi 07 avril, Julien Puydt a écrit: I'll dig the documentation to find out how to make one of what I have (I think it's a 5.0.beta4 or 5.0.beta5), and post a link. Well, it's only a 4.8 after all : I only had one 5.0beta?? tree left, and it was in a dubious state. 4.8 is the last which

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-10 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2012-04-07 16:00, Julien Puydt wrote: -Werror I haven't looked at the new eclib, but please don't use -Werror. Some devel version of MPC broke because of that, I managed to convince the MPC developers to remove -Werror. You just don't know which warnings different versions of gcc will

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-10 Thread John Cremona
Julien, Sorry that I had not responded to this -- probably eclib issues should be in another thread. Although I interpreted your nifty as positive, I take Jeroen's point about not using -Werror, but I'll leave in -Wall. On 7 April 2012 15:00, Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net wrote: Le

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-10 Thread John Cremona
PS I also read libsrc/Makefile.am : can't the file listed in EXTRA_DIST be put in the various *_DOTHS? I could rename that variable as (say) extra_includes and add it to the DOTHS list.  They are not header files though. The files listed in EXTRA_DIST are needed when building the library,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-10 Thread John Cremona
On 10 April 2012 17:20, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote: Julien, Sorry that I had not responded to this -- probably eclib issues should be in another thread. Although I interpreted your nifty as positive, I take Jeroen's point about not using -Werror, but I'll leave in -Wall. On

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-10 Thread mmarco
Well, it's only a 4.8 after all : I only had one 5.0beta?? tree left, and it was in a dubious state. 4.8 is the last which should work (even though I didn't use it since long :-/) I ran ./sage -bdist 4.8, then removed the obtained .tar.gz, then re-made a .tar.bz2 (and it's still big...).

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-09 Thread mmarco
I can install a newer ubuntu system in a chroot. I think that the fact of running under a chroot environment shouldn't prevent the sage build from running. All the libraries are in the chroot jail. So if you have an armel build, i can give it a try. -- To post to this group, send an email to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-09 Thread Julien Puydt
Le lundi 09 avril, mmarco a écrit: So if you have an armel build, i can give it a try. I'll dig the documentation to find out how to make one of what I have (I think it's a 5.0.beta4 or 5.0.beta5), and post a link. Snark on #sagemath -- To post to this group, send an email to

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-09 Thread leif
On 7 Apr., 23:55, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote: I have a new autotools-based release of eclib, which will be turned into a new spkg after the weekend, and with luck that will settle some build issues. Nice. No more `make` warnings due to Makefiles including each other, no more

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-08 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2012-04-07, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote: Ok, i finally got the tablet, installed ubuntu in a chroot, and tried Could you tell is the specifications of your tablet? to compile sage. The build process went on pretty far,but eclib keeps failing. I get the following error message: Assembler

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-08 Thread mmarco
Could you tell is the specifications of your tablet? It's an asus transformer prime. The processor is an nvidia tegra 3. bash-4.0# more /proc/cpuinfo Processor : ARMv7 Processor rev 9 (v7l) processor : 0 BogoMIPS: 1993.93 processor : 1 BogoMIPS: 1993.93

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-08 Thread Julien Puydt
Le Sat, 7 Apr 2012 14:36:16 -0700 (PDT), mmarco mma...@unizar.es a écrit : And in a related question: is there any compiled tarball of sage for arm available somewhere? I had made one available, but it was ages ago, so the file is probably not available anymore : my provider's big files

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-08 Thread mmarco
Ok, i have tried to enable 2 gigs of swap space, and it keeps failing with the same error message, although it takes much more time to crash (from 8 minutes without swap to more than two hours with the 2 gigs). It really sounds like a memory problem, but i am not sure that more swap would solve

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-08 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2012-04-08, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote: Ok, i have tried to enable 2 gigs of swap space, and it keeps failing with the same error message, although it takes much more time to crash (from 8 minutes without swap to more than two hours with the 2 gigs). It really sounds like a memory

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-08 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2012-04-08, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote: Ok, i have tried to enable 2 gigs of swap space, and it keeps failing with the same error message, although it takes much more time to crash (from 8 minutes without swap to more than two hours with the 2 gigs). It really sounds like a memory

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-08 Thread mmarco
its version 4.8, with flint 1.5.2 -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL:

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-08 Thread mmarco
and my chroot environment is ubuntu 9.11 armel. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL:

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-08 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2012-04-08, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote: and my chroot environment is ubuntu 9.11 armel. Snark and me are using a newer ubuntu, 11.10. And no chroot, but a native Linux, with Android wiped out for good. So it's a fairly different setup. I guess if I compile Sage it would not run on your

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-08 Thread Volker Braun
On Saturday, April 7, 2012 10:36:16 PM UTC+1, mmarco wrote: Assembler messages: Fatal error: can't create egr_n.o: Input/output error Something is wrong with your storage. Do you have enough free disk space in the debian image? A good file system? Any storage-related errors in the system

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-08 Thread Julien Puydt
Le Sun, 8 Apr 2012 17:26:47 + (UTC), Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com a écrit : On 2012-04-08, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote: and my chroot environment is ubuntu 9.11 armel. Snark and me are using a newer ubuntu, 11.10. and armhf And no chroot, but a native Linux, with Android wiped

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-08 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2012-04-08, Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net wrote: Le Sun, 8 Apr 2012 17:26:47 + (UTC), Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com a écrit : On 2012-04-08, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote: and my chroot environment is ubuntu 9.11 armel. Snark and me are using a newer ubuntu, 11.10. and

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-07 Thread mmarco
Ok, i finally got the tablet, installed ubuntu in a chroot, and tried to compile sage. The build process went on pretty far,but eclib keeps failing. I get the following error message: Assembler messages: Fatal error: can't create egr_n.o: Input/output error Any clue about how to solve this? And

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-07 Thread John Cremona
On 7 April 2012 22:36, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote: Ok, i finally got the tablet, installed ubuntu in a chroot, and tried to compile sage. The build process went on pretty far,but eclib keeps failing. I get the following error message: Assembler messages: Fatal error: can't create egr_n.o:

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-04-07 Thread mmarco
No, sorry.  Perhaps this is where you happen to run out of memory? It's possible. I think i hit into a memory problem with symmetrica, but solved it enabling a 512mb swap file. Maybe it wasn't enough for eclib. I have a new autotools-based release of eclib, which will be turned into a new

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-03-23 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2012-03-23, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote: I tried to answer to the post of the arm port, but i am not sure why i can't. I am considering buying an asus eeepad transformer prime. So i would like to compile sage on it. What are the changes that need to be done to the source code to do it?.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-03-23 Thread Julien Puydt
Le vendredi 23 mars, Dima Pasechnik a écrit: On 2012-03-23, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote: I tried to answer to the post of the arm port, but i am not sure why i can't. I am considering buying an asus eeepad transformer prime. So i would like to compile sage on it. What are the changes

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-03-23 Thread mmarco
Does that run android or a complete distribution? It does run android, but i have read that it is possible to install ubuntu in a chroot environment. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to

[sage-devel] Re: ARM port (again)

2012-03-23 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2012-03-23, Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net wrote: Le vendredi 23 mars, Julien Puydt a écrit: from the top of my head, you'll mostly need a newer flint (1.5.2) Here is the trac ticket about the flint package: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10328 Please review it! It needs