On 2017-12-30, Simon King wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As it turns out, building cvxopt's docs requires
> 'sphinxcontrib-websupport'. Would it be acceptable to add this to Sage's
> sphinx installation?
I suppose it is more than just acceptable. Without it, in a Sage shell,
even
Hi!
As it turns out, building cvxopt's docs requires
'sphinxcontrib-websupport'. Would it be acceptable to add this to Sage's
sphinx installation?
Cheers,
Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
On 2017-12-30, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Dima,
>
> On 2017-12-30, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> On Friday, December 29, 2017 at 6:04:34 PM UTC, Simon King wrote:
>>> Is it a known problem that the documentation doesn't build for cvxopt?
>>>
>> it used to work.
Hi Dima,
On 2017-12-30, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Friday, December 29, 2017 at 6:04:34 PM UTC, Simon King wrote:
>> Is it a known problem that the documentation doesn't build for cvxopt?
>>
> it used to work.
> Open a ticket...
Done: #24447
Cheers,
Simon
--
You received
On Friday, December 29, 2017 at 6:04:34 PM UTC, Simon King wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Trying to upgrade to Sage 8.2.beta1, cvxopt fails to install after being
> successfully installed.
>
> More precisely, near the end of the logs, I see this:
>
> [cvxopt-1.1.8.p2] Removing source in