Re: [sage-devel] Nauty as a default generator for graphs

2018-03-14 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 08:19:19AM +0200, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: > It is much faster to say sum(1 for _ in graphs.nauty_geng(7)) than sum(1 for > _ in graphs(7)), and after #19919 we have nauty as a standard package. > > Will I break something if I change graphs(n) without any additional >

Re: [sage-devel] Nauty as a default generator for graphs

2018-03-12 Thread Jori Mäntysalo
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, David Roe wrote: Will I break something if I change graphs(n) without any additional parameter to use nauty? It did the change at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24951 Sounds good to me.  You might add an algorithm keyword to the graphs function, which defaults to

Re: [sage-devel] Nauty as a default generator for graphs

2018-03-09 Thread David Roe
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 1:19 AM, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: > It is much faster to say sum(1 for _ in graphs.nauty_geng(7)) than sum(1 > for _ in graphs(7)), and after #19919 we have nauty as a standard package. > > Will I break something if I change graphs(n) without any