On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 08:19:19AM +0200, Jori Mäntysalo wrote:
> It is much faster to say sum(1 for _ in graphs.nauty_geng(7)) than sum(1 for
> _ in graphs(7)), and after #19919 we have nauty as a standard package.
>
> Will I break something if I change graphs(n) without any additional
>
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, David Roe wrote:
Will I break something if I change graphs(n) without any
additional parameter to use nauty?
It did the change at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24951
Sounds good to me. You might add an algorithm keyword to the graphs
function, which defaults to
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 1:19 AM, Jori Mäntysalo
wrote:
> It is much faster to say sum(1 for _ in graphs.nauty_geng(7)) than sum(1
> for _ in graphs(7)), and after #19919 we have nauty as a standard package.
>
> Will I break something if I change graphs(n) without any