On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 2:41:17 PM UTC+2, vdelecroix wrote:
>
>
> Yes! A function in Python always return a unique object. This object
> might be a tuple or a list with several components.
Ok. Now I understand how you view things.
I always thought it is a common idiom in Python that when
On 22/05/2017 14:35, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
It seems that some misunderstanding is going on here.
If a method returns an integer and a matrix by "Return n, m". I am saying
that the output block can be simply
OUTPUT:
- integer ...
- matrix ...
instead of
OUTPUT: a tuple of ``(n,m)`` where
- ``n
It seems that some misunderstanding is going on here.
If a method returns an integer and a matrix by "Return n, m". I am saying
that the output block can be simply
OUTPUT:
- integer ...
- matrix ...
instead of
OUTPUT: a tuple of ``(n,m)`` where
- ``n`` is a integer ...
- ``m`` is a matrix
On Mon, 22 May 2017, Daniel Krenn wrote:
My opinion is that the phrase "a tuple `(a,b,c)` where ..." is just
redundant.
I think that "a tuple" is important non-redundant information.
+1 for "a tuple" in this case (and not skipping this information; it is
essential)
+1 from me too. Somethin
On 2017-05-22 12:08, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2017-05-22 12:05, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
>> My opinion is that the phrase "a tuple `(a,b,c)` where ..." is just
>> redundant.
>
> I think that "a tuple" is important non-redundant information.
+1 for "a tuple" in this case (and not skipping this informa
On 2017-05-22 12:21, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
The non-redundant information will be implied by the list of hyphened
items, if we stick to the convention.
So, in order to understand the docstring, the user needs to read the
docstring and the convention on how to read the docstring. Not good!
--
You
On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 12:08:35 PM UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2017-05-22 12:05, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> > My opinion is that the phrase "a tuple `(a,b,c)` where ..." is just
> > redundant.
>
> I think that "a tuple" is important non-redundant information.
>
The non-redundant inform
On 2017-05-22 12:05, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
My opinion is that the phrase "a tuple `(a,b,c)` where ..." is just
redundant.
I think that "a tuple" is important non-redundant information.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe
On 2017-05-22 12:05, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
This is ugly. By your previous opinion, wouldn't you prefer this?
|
OUTPUT:a tuple of ``(a,b,c)``where
-``a``is...
-``b``is...
-``c``is...
|
I think that the guideline of this thread combined with your one-liner
style for OUTPUT allows this.
Of cours
On Monday, May 22, 2017 at 10:24:32 AM UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> I very much object to this:
>
> > If the output consists
> > of several items, add each starting with a hyphen.
>
> If the output consists of several items, the OUTPUT string should
> clearly mention that fact (and it sho
I very much object to this:
If the output consists
of several items, add each starting with a hyphen.
If the output consists of several items, the OUTPUT string should
clearly mention that fact (and it should mention whether the output is a
tuple or list or some other structure with several
> As I mentioned on the other thread, since OUTPUT is not a list of things
> (as opposed to INPUT), I would prefer
>
> OUTPUT: tuple of lattices
+1 on this option (and hence -1 to the thread's suggestion).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel
On 2017-05-19 08:57, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> As I mentioned on the other thread, since OUTPUT is not a list of things
> (as opposed to INPUT), I would prefer
>
> OUTPUT: tuple of lattices
+1 for this option
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-deve
As I mentioned on the other thread, since OUTPUT is not a list of things
(as opposed to INPUT), I would prefer
OUTPUT: tuple of lattices
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails fro
14 matches
Mail list logo
