Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2.beta2 released

2014-02-27 Thread François Bissey
That may be actually the beginning of an explanation of why the problem is solved by upgrading system mercurial - the new one uses a newer python infrastructure in Gentoo and may be protected from such injection. So we may have a couple of question down. So Gentoo users affected by this should upg

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2.beta2 released

2014-02-27 Thread Volker Braun
Mercurial is a Python program. While building Sage's Python the interpreter might be in a bad shape, or we inject libraries via LD_LIBRARY_PATH into the system interpreter that break it. On Thursday, February 27, 2014 11:37:37 PM UTC+1, François wrote: > > It is all a bit of a mystery. Why is th

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2.beta2 released

2014-02-27 Thread François Bissey
It is all a bit of a mystery. Why is the system python building? Why is sage's one not? Why did it stop working when upgrading? Why moving to hg-2.5 solve the problem? Francois On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 14:31:12 strogdon wrote: > So with mercurial-2.5.4 installed python-2.7.5.p2 will build. So perhaps

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2.beta2 released

2014-02-27 Thread strogdon
So with mercurial-2.5.4 installed python-2.7.5.p2 will build. So perhaps the version I had installed (2.4.2) is buggy? But it was this 2.4.2 version that was present when python-2.7.5.p1 built without a problem? Hmm. Just to make sure, before I did this, I rebuilt mercurial-2.4.2 and python-2.7.

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2.beta2 released

2014-02-27 Thread François Bissey
Can you update to 2.5.4 at least? If that works I wonder what is done on Gentoo to avoid the problem. Could there be something in ~/.hgrc or ~/.sage that triggers this? Francois On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 13:19:24 strogdon wrote: > # eix dev-vcs/mercurial > [I] dev-vcs/mercurial > Available versio

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2.beta2 released

2014-02-27 Thread strogdon
# eix dev-vcs/mercurial [I] dev-vcs/mercurial Available versions: 2.4.2 ~2.5.4 ~2.6.3 ~2.7.2 ~2.8.2 ~2.9 ** {bugzilla emacs gpg test tk zsh-completion PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_6 python2_7"} Installed versions: 2.4.2(10:03:49 AM 02/12/2013)(bugzilla tk -emacs -gpg -test -zsh-comple

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2.beta2 released

2014-02-27 Thread François Bissey
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:10:45 François Bissey wrote: > On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:44:30 strogdon wrote: > > After looking at ticket 15317 I see that could be a possibility. From the > > sage shell > > > > (sage-sh) strogdon@ledaig:sage$ which hg > > /usr/bin/hg > > > > So, why now? And must I now rem

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2.beta2 released

2014-02-27 Thread François Bissey
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:44:30 strogdon wrote: > After looking at ticket 15317 I see that could be a possibility. From the > sage shell > > (sage-sh) strogdon@ledaig:sage$ which hg > /usr/bin/hg > > So, why now? And must I now remove it from my PATH? Experiment for the brave: Delete build/pkgs/p

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2.beta2 released

2014-02-27 Thread François Bissey
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 12:44:22 strogdon wrote: > Which python logs, Gentoo or vanilla Sage? > Gentoo. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2.beta2 released

2014-02-27 Thread strogdon
Which python logs, Gentoo or vanilla Sage? On Thursday, February 27, 2014 2:35:21 PM UTC-6, François wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 12:33:10 strogdon wrote: > > Yes this seems to do the trick. I'm sure my system hg is not broken. My > > system python builds yet fine with it present. When it can'

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2.beta2 released

2014-02-27 Thread François Bissey
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 12:33:10 strogdon wrote: > Yes this seems to do the trick. I'm sure my system hg is not broken. My > system python builds yet fine with it present. When it can't find a HG > repository it aborts the search and continues building. > > On Thursday, February 27, 2014 2:22:33 PM UT

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2.beta2 released

2014-02-27 Thread strogdon
Yes this seems to do the trick. I'm sure my system hg is not broken. My system python builds yet fine with it present. When it can't find a HG repository it aborts the search and continues building. On Thursday, February 27, 2014 2:22:33 PM UTC-6, François wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:44:30

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2.beta2 released

2014-02-27 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2014-02-27 19:19, strogdon wrote: gcc -pthread -c -fno-strict-aliasing -g -O2 -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -I. -IInclude -I./Include -fPIC -DPy_BUILD_CORE \ -DSVNVERSION="\"`LC_ALL=C svnversion .`\"" \ -DHGVERSION="\"`LC_ALL=C hg id -i .`\"" \ -DHGTAG="\"`LC_ALL=C hg i

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2.beta2 released

2014-02-27 Thread François Bissey
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:44:30 strogdon wrote: > After looking at ticket 15317 I see that could be a possibility. From the > sage shell > > (sage-sh) strogdon@ledaig:sage$ which hg > /usr/bin/hg > > So, why now? And must I now remove it from my PATH? I seriously doubt hg on Steve's system is bro

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2.beta2 released

2014-02-27 Thread strogdon
After looking at ticket 15317 I see that could be a possibility. From the sage shell (sage-sh) strogdon@ledaig:sage$ which hg /usr/bin/hg So, why now? And must I now remove it from my PATH? On Thursday, February 27, 2014 1:36:05 PM UTC-6, Volker Braun wrote: > > You have a "hg" program in your

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2.beta2 released

2014-02-27 Thread Volker Braun
You have a "hg" program in your path that is trying to interactively ask questions. On Thursday, February 27, 2014 7:19:50 PM UTC+1, strogdon wrote: > > I've seen no post on the issue I'm having so here goes. I have > sage-6.2.beta1 installed. After pulling from the git repo to get 6.2.beta2

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.2.beta2 released

2014-02-27 Thread strogdon
I've seen no post on the issue I'm having so here goes. I have sage-6.2.beta1 installed. After pulling from the git repo to get 6.2.beta2 and issuing make as I've always done, the new python (python-2.7.5.p2) will not build. It just hangs doing something? Before I do a make distclean to see if