Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2 released

2020-11-03 Thread 'jonatha...@googlemail.com' via sage-release
Thank you Samuel for your reply. I know nothing about windows and I have been amazed by the fact that the windows binaries are produced somehow. In that way, it doesn't surprise me that they are not just produced somehow, but a decent effort is put into it. I just never looked into it, because

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta0 released

2020-11-03 Thread David Coudert
> Le 2 nov. 2020 à 22:38, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > > > On Mon, 2 Nov 2020, 21:36 David Coudert, > wrote: > So should we open a ticket to add it and hope it will be included in next > beta or is there a trick to force the installation of giac ? > > one

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2 released

2020-11-03 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2020-11-03 09:57:12 UTC, Jonathan: > > There no windows binaries for 9.2 yet. Maybe there > is a reason for it, but I should wanted to post that. > It's being worked on. It's not unusual that preparing Windows binaries for a new Sage version takes a few days to a few weeks. New releases of

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2 released

2020-11-03 Thread 'jonatha...@googlemail.com' via sage-release
There no windows binaries for 9.2 yet. Maybe there is a reason for it, but I should wanted to post that. http://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/pub/sage/win/index.html jaap...@gmail.com schrieb am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2020 um 22:51:36 UTC+1: > On Raspberry Pi OS 64 bit build ok with the "usual" test

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta0 released

2020-11-03 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 10:39 PM John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > On Monday, November 2, 2020 at 1:38:37 PM UTC-8, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, 2 Nov 2020, 21:36 David Coudert, wrote: >>> >>> So should we open a ticket to add it and hope it will be included in next >>> beta or is