Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.0.rc0 released

Hi, almost everything works installed from scratch with recommended system packages on manjaro. I get some doctests failures sage -t --long --warn-long 58.0 --random-seed=56439470687750385659257200164528769383 src/sage/interfaces/four_ti_2.py # 5 doctests failed Which are just deprecation

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc2 release

Thanks Volker for preparing the release. All tests pass on debian buster, except sage -t --long --random-seed=146168601452887490256495561253701871534 src/sage/tests/cmdline.py # 3 doctests failed as squlite executable is not

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.5.beta2 released

Build gets stuck on debian buster. `make sdist-clean` did not help. After pressing Ctrl + C it seems fine. Jonathan For some reason I can't attach a file anymore, so the config.log is here http://page.mi.fu-berlin.de/kliem/config.log [sagenb_export-3.3] INFO: This is taking longer than usual.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.beta3 released

This problem has already been resolved in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32031. setuptools currently removes setuptools_scm without triggering a rebuild. So I would recommond make setuptools_scm-clean to fix this. emanuel.c...@gmail.com schrieb am Sonntag, 27. Juni 2021 um 13:49:28 UTC+2:

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.beta3 released

Just for completeness. You can just fix this with make setuptools_scm-clean The patch in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32031 will fix the underlying problem so that this won't be needed in the future. Dima Pasechnik schrieb am Dienstag, 22. Juni 2021 um 22:04:56 UTC+2: > On Tue, Jun 22,

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.4.beta3 released

Thanks Volker for the new release. Unfortunatly, installation fails for me due to mpmath https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31564 and py https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30416. Both of them require setuptools-scm in the setup.py (no pyproject.toml), but do not pick up our setuptools_scm

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta7 released, patchbot issue

Oh yes, you probably have too few sucessful tests I would propose to change this (init_warn_long) to set self.optioins.warn_long = 60 in case of this RuntimeError jonatha...@googlemail.com schrieb am Dienstag, 16. Februar 2021 um 19:27:39 UTC+1: > Here is what I think is relevant > > in

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta7 released, patchbot issue

Here is what I think is relevant in control.py 431 def _init_warn_long(self): 432 + 23 lines: """ 455 if

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta3 released

Yes. Long time ago, I created a list of known failures when using some system packages (most of them are taken care of by now and new ones came up, however this one is old): https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27122#comment:40 >From this you see that this is ticket 29092:

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.3.beta2 released

I opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30958 for the C99 thing that caused the following: The first one is new, I think. File "src/sage/graphs/connectivity.pyx", line 2686, in sage.graphs.connectivity._Component.__init__ Failed example: cython(os.linesep.join(cython_code)) [...]

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2 released

Thank you Samuel for your reply. I know nothing about windows and I have been amazed by the fact that the windows binaries are produced somehow. In that way, it doesn't surprise me that they are not just produced somehow, but a decent effort is put into it. I just never looked into it, because

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2 released

There no windows binaries for 9.2 yet. Maybe there is a reason for it, but I should wanted to post that. http://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/pub/sage/win/index.html jaap...@gmail.com schrieb am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2020 um 22:51:36 UTC+1: > On Raspberry Pi OS 64 bit build ok with the "usual" test

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta13 released

On ubuntu bionic incremental build of and dateutils fail. Those are the logs: Found local metadata for zipp-0.5.2 2 Attempting to download package zipp-0.5.2.tar.gz from mirrors 3 https://mirror.koddos.net/sagemath/spkg/upstream/zipp/zipp-0.5.2.tar.gz 4

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta12 released

pynormaliz 2.12 isn't on the mirrors yet (I can work around that) Dima Pasechnik schrieb am Montag, 7. September 2020 um 13:20:34 UTC+2: > please also send the top-level config.log > Otherwise it is not clear how to reproduce this, e.g. what Python is used. > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 10:09 AM

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta11 released

I'm responsible for some ridiculous long doctests in `src/sage/geometry/polyhedron/library.py`. https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30489 is a two line ticket (positive review), which should take care of the time out. https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30490 reduces the doctesting time a bit more

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta9 released

I have create https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30427 for the memory leak in divisors of integers. jonatha...@googlemail.com schrieb am Freitag, 21. August 2020 um 09:08:44 UTC+2: > I can confirm the rings/integer.pyx failure from running it in the shell. > > sage: n = prod(primes_first_n(25))

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.2.beta9 released

I can confirm the rings/integer.pyx failure from running it in the shell. sage: n = prod(primes_first_n(25)) sage: _ = n.divisors() If I cancel the second line many time (after a few seconds each), I see an increase in memory usage. There doesn't seem to be a limit to it. I can immitate the