On Thursday, May 27, 2021 at 12:11:11 PM UTC-7 jus...@mac.com wrote:
>
> > On May 26, 2021, at 14:13, Volker Braun wrote:
> >
> > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
>
On Thursday, May 27, 2021 at 5:55:39 AM UTC-7 Sébastien Labbé wrote:
> I have python3.6 and python3.8 installed on my system:
> [...]
> My python3.8 has the above librairies available. But, it seems that my
> python3.8 is not picked up by the configure script:
>
>
See
On Monday, May 10, 2021 at 2:24:54 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote:
> The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-9.3. As always, you can
> get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively,
> the self-contained source tarball is at
>
On Friday, April 30, 2021 at 4:13:29 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote:
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> c27d4d6803 (tag: 9.3.rc5, trac/develop)
I have opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31786
Meta-ticket: Support gcc 11
This should be for Sage 9.4
On Saturday, May 1, 2021 at 1:41:40 PM UTC-7 François Bissey wrote:
>
>
> > On 2/05/2021, at 06:57, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >
> > I'd rather try gcc 11 instead.
>
> If you want. We
On Saturday, May 1, 2021 at 11:57:38 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Sat, 1 May 2021, 15:20 Enrique Artal, wrote:
>
>> I have tried to compile it in Fedora 34, I know it is a very recent
>> release and problems would be expected. The first one is that F34 uses
>> gcc11 and it seems to be
As previously noted, see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31348
On Monday, April 19, 2021 at 2:13:45 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Something is a bit broken in your toolchain.
> Did you build with Homebrew packages and then forgot to
> source .homebrew-build-env ?
> (which might also be
It's an annoying shortcoming of our build system. This particular problem
is explained in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29711, on which you are
already cc'd. Overall I agree that possible remedies for failures in
incremental builds are not sufficiently explained anywhere in our
On Saturday, April 10, 2021 at 1:23:53 PM UTC-7 emanuel.c...@gmail.com
wrote:
> It seems that something (what ?) is not updated in the build process
> scripts and still points to the Singular version used in 9.3.rc0. I
> suppose that rebuildig would fix the problem [...]
>
It suffices to
;https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31621>
ubuntu-groovy-standard: numerics-related sage testsuite errors
<https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31621>
Help is needed...
On Thursday, April 8, 2021 at 9:27:54 AM UTC-7 Matthias Köppe wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 10:29:29 AM UTC-7 M
On Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 10:29:29 AM UTC-7 Matthias Köppe wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 6, 2021 at 3:33:00 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote:
>
>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
>> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained s
>From the log:
- many instances of fatal error: 'gmp.h' file not found
- many instances of 'ld: library not found for -lmpfr'
This is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31348
As a workaround, it may help to run "make ptestlong" in the shell after
using ". .homebrew-build-env"
On Wednesday,
On Tuesday, April 6, 2021 at 3:33:00 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote:
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> 824f9cccaf (tag: 9.3.rc2, trac/develop)
, 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-release <
> sage-r...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for looking at this. See below:
> >
> >> On Mar 31, 2021, at 17:33 , Matthias Köppe
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wednesday, March 31, 2021 at 2:53:22 PM UT
On Wednesday, March 31, 2021 at 2:53:22 PM UTC-7 jus...@mac.com wrote:
> with rc0 and rc1, I have a real problem on all three macOS systems of mine
> (10.13.6, 10.14.6 and 10.15.7): the build proceeds a while, and then blows
> up on pynac. The log for this build, and the config.log, are
Thanks, Volker, for preparing 9.3.rc0 and .rc1.
As the GH Actions run at
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/actions/runs/699525589 shows, there are
still various serious issues that need to be fixed, in particular so that
we do not have regressions in platform support compared to the previous
We updated Singular. You may have to use "make sagelib-clean" to rebuild
the Sage library from scratch.
(See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29711 for the issue that sagelib does
not have proper dependencies on the libraries that it uses.)
On Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 7:09:26 PM UTC-7 Samuel
On Monday, March 15, 2021 at 6:00:13 PM UTC-7 Samuel Lelievre wrote:
> 2021-03-14 17:53 UTC, Matthias Köppe:
> > Could you try with: export SETUPTOOLS_USE_DISTUTILS=local
> > before restarting build?
>
> That trick helps.
>
> a.
>
> Starting from
On Monday, March 15, 2021 at 1:42:44 PM UTC-7 Samuel Lelievre wrote:
> On macOS 10.14.6, in a fresh clone, I got this:
> ```
> $ source .homebrew-build-env
> $ ./bootstrap -q
> $ ./configure --enable-download-from-upstream-url -q
> ./configure: line 40596: SAGE_SPKG_CONFIGURE_SAGELIB:
Use ". .homebrew-build-env" before building.
(See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29872)
Also https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31348
("build/pkgs/{mpir,mpfr}/spkg-configure.m4: Check pkg-config first") would
improve this -- this ticket needs help.
On Monday, March 15, 2021 at 6:26:40 AM
On Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 6:02:03 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote:
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> We should start with the first release
On Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 10:57:13 AM UTC-7 Matthias Köppe wrote:
> Results for macOS 11 (Big Sur) using
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31492 at
> https://github.com/mkoeppe/sage/runs/2103782309
>
local-macos (homebrew-macos, minimal, default, *macos-11.0*)
https://github
On Saturday, March 13, 2021 at 11:21:20 AM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote:
> On Monday, March 8, 2021 at 6:16:41 AM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 7:28:28 PM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 1:35:32
On Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 10:48:30 AM UTC-7 Samuel Lelievre wrote:
> 2021-03-13 17:27 UTC, Matthias Köppe:
> > On Friday, March 12, 2021 at 1:00:17 PM UTC-8 Samuel Lelievre wrote:
> >> On macOS 10.14.6, with Homebrew, failed to build cysignals-1.10.2.
> >
On Monday, March 8, 2021 at 6:16:41 AM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote:
> On Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 7:28:28 PM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 1:35:32 PM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from th
>From your log:
gcc -bundle -undefined dynamic_lookup -isysroot
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX10.14.sdk
-L/opt/s/sage93c/local/lib -Wl,-rpath,/opt/s/sage93c/local/lib -O2 -g
-march=native -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
build/temp.macosx-10.14-x86_64-3.9/build/src/cysignals/signals.o
See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30945
On Monday, March 8, 2021 at 11:52:46 AM UTC-8 François Bissey wrote:
> I have been having a segfault in that file for a while between 9.3.beta7
> and 9.3.beta8
> in sage-on-gentoo when running parallel testing. However the tests run all
> fine on that
On Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 7:28:28 PM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote:
> On Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 1:35:32 PM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote:
>
>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
>> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained s
On Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 1:35:32 PM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote:
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> fbca269f62 (HEAD -> develop, tag:
On Tuesday, February 9, 2021 at 9:41:54 PM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote:
> The runs on GH Actions show a very strange failure on fedora-34 and
> archlinux-latest (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/1850248457):
>
> + ./bootstrap
>
> ./sage: no Sage installation found i
On Thursday, February 11, 2021 at 3:49:44 PM UTC-8 John H Palmieri wrote:
> I just noticed something which has been happening for all of the 9.3 beta
> releases, maybe before that. In the dochtml.log file, I see the message
>
> Help file /Applications/usr/share/giac/doc/fr/aide_cas not found
On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 2:04:42 PM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote:
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> 8453ffb849 (tag: 9.3.beta7,
I've opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31372 for this.
On Tuesday, February 9, 2021 at 11:59:51 AM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote:
> [pari_jupyter-1.3.2] gcc -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -DNDEBUG -g
> -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -Wno-unused -O2 -g -O2 -g -fPIC
> -I/home/sage/sage/loca
:40 AM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 9, 2021 at 11:38:29 AM UTC-8 fchap...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>> This release breaks (again) our automated docker build on gitlab :
>>
>> see https://gitlab.com/sagemath/sage/-/pipelines
>>
>>
On Tuesday, February 9, 2021 at 11:38:29 AM UTC-8 fchap...@gmail.com wrote:
> This release breaks (again) our automated docker build on gitlab :
>
> see https://gitlab.com/sagemath/sage/-/pipelines
>
>
>From the log:
Error building Sage.
The following package(s) may have failed to build (not
Fixed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31358
On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 9:06:37 PM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote:
> These LDFLAGS are read from `python3 -m sysconfig`. The "-L." flag there
> is causing this python3 to be rejected by the new checks from
> https://trac.
These LDFLAGS are read from `python3 -m sysconfig`. The "-L." flag there is
causing this python3 to be rejected by the new checks from
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31132 .
Looks like using this flag is a gentoo specialty.
On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 8:42:35 PM UTC-8 Steven Trogdon
On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 2:04:42 PM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote:
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> 8453ffb849 (tag: 9.3.beta7,
On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 2:04:42 PM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote:
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
Thanks, Volker, for preparing the new
On Friday, December 18, 2020 at 8:55:29 AM UTC-8 emanuel.c...@gmail.com
wrote:
> On Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM, upgrading 9.3.beta3
> (configured
> to use all available system packages) to 9.3.beta4 leads
> to :
>
>-
>
>./configure insists on installing
On Tuesday, November 24, 2020 at 9:49:18 PM UTC-8 Matthias Köppe wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 24, 2020 at 3:26:08 PM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote:
>
>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
>> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained s
On Tuesday, November 24, 2020 at 3:26:08 PM UTC-8 Volker Braun wrote:
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> 020bd59ec2 (tag: 9.3.beta2,
Samuel, you didn't include config.log, but my guess is that it would reveal
that you are not using python3 from system or homebrew. config.log contains
the relevant information why the system python3 is rejected by Sage.
On Thursday, November 19, 2020 at 4:42:07 PM UTC-8 Samuel Lelievre wrote:
On Friday, November 20, 2020 at 12:32:38 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Can one use nodejs from Homebrew instead?
> (this is something we need to enable properly, via spkg-configure)
>
>
Ticket https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30476, with the modest goal of just
*documenting* how to get a
On Sunday, November 1, 2020 at 7:29:31 AM UTC-8, David Coudert wrote:
>
> I’m unable to build beta0 on macOS 10.15.7 :(
>
> I did:
> $ make distclean
> $ ./bootstrap
> $ source .homebrew-build-env
> $ ./configure
> [...]
> I then tried
> $ make V=0 build
>
> but it fails.[...]
>
> The log file can
On Saturday, October 24, 2020 at 3:49:58 PM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-9.2. As always, you can
> get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively,
> the self-contained source tarball is at
>
On Saturday, October 10, 2020 at 4:43:29 PM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
>
> 8eec238a73 (tag: 9.2.rc1,
-7 Matthias Köppe wrote:
> This is likely from the most recent setuptools upgrade.
>
> Try if https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29500 fixes this for you.
>
> On Wednesday, September 23, 2020 at 2:58:38 AM UTC-7
> jonatha...@googlemail.com wrote:
>
>> On ubun
This is likely from the most recent setuptools upgrade.
Try if https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29500 fixes this for you.
On Wednesday, September 23, 2020 at 2:58:38 AM UTC-7
jonatha...@googlemail.com wrote:
> On ubuntu bionic incremental build of and dateutils fail.
>
> Those are the logs:
On Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at 10:05:59 AM UTC-7 Samuel Lelievre wrote:
> [...] what we should do about it is probably adapt the wording
> to better convey that. For instance:
>
> hint: installing the following system packages, if not already
> present, is recommended and may avoid building
On Friday, September 11, 2020 at 3:31:21 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> Probably you want to configure with CC=clang CXX=clang++
>
That's actually not necessary. homebrew does not provide unversioned gcc
and g++ executables, so gcc -> /usr/bin/gcc and g++ -> /usr/bin/g++
--
You
On Friday, September 11, 2020 at 12:06:51 PM UTC-7, Markus Wageringel wrote:
>
> I think it might be better to stop the build earlier (and maybe ask for
> confirmation) before proceeding to build Python, to avoid building Python
> and all its dependencies a second time after installing OpenSSL.
On Friday, September 11, 2020 at 11:34:15 AM UTC-7, Markus Wageringel wrote:
>
> > Am 11.09.2020 um 20:17 schrieb Matthias Köppe >:
> >
> > Is "libssl-dev" installed? (see build/pkgs/openssl/distros/debian.txt)
>
>
(This is the name of the Debi
On Friday, September 11, 2020 at 10:55:57 AM UTC-7, Markus Wageringel wrote:
>
> With a clean build on Ubuntu 20.04, ptestlong passes, but Jupyter does not
> start anymore due to an SSL problem, Which packages need to be installed
> for this and why was this not a problem previously? OpenSSL is
On Friday, September 11, 2020 at 10:55:57 AM UTC-7, Markus Wageringel wrote:
>
> 9.2.beta11 has introduced crashes of the doctests in
> `src/sage/interfaces/singular.py` that were reproducible on about 20% of
> the test runs and have been observed by several other people as well. I
> have
On Thursday, September 10, 2020 at 10:08:32 AM UTC-7, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>
> On a MacBook Air (early 2014) with
> macOS 10.14.6 Mojave, with Homebrew
> (but having removed Homebrew packages
> gcc@9, python@3.7, arb, flint, gap, singular),
> `make` succeeds but `make testlong` fails
>
On Thursday, September 10, 2020 at 6:52:09 AM UTC-7, Sébastien Labbé wrote:
>
> On Ubuntu 18.04, it picks up the python3.6 available on the machine:
>
> ## ##
> ## Checking whether SageMath should install SPKG python3... ##
> ##
On Wednesday, September 9, 2020 at 3:08:31 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> except that on macOS+Homebrew the latter wants the PATH like this:
>
> % cat ~/.zshrc
> export PATH="/usr/local/opt/python@3.7/bin:$PATH"
>
> I am not sure whether putting /usr/local/bin first won't break Homebrew.
>
On Wednesday, September 9, 2020 at 2:23:36 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> The autoconf macro in question is looping over the entries in the PATH
> (and this is documented behaviour)
> So the outer loop is
>
> for as_dir in $PATH
>
> now, the PATH is a bit funny in my case:
>
>
>
Very strange, can you run it with ./configure CONFIG_SHELL="bash -x" and
post the output?
On Wednesday, September 9, 2020 at 1:17:04 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 9:04 PM Matthias Köppe > wrote:
> >
> > Are you using a confi
Are you using a configure cache? Because according to your config.log, it's
only checking 1 binary
On Wednesday, September 9, 2020 at 12:58:26 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:54 PM Matthias Köppe > wrote:
> >
> > Is "python3.8" i
Is "python3.8" in PATH?
On Wednesday, September 9, 2020 at 12:44:50 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> here it is. The account shell is zsh, but this most probably does not
> matter.
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 6:31 PM Matthias Köppe > wrote:
> >
> >
On Tuesday, September 8, 2020 at 9:23:04 PM UTC-7, Matthias Köppe wrote:
>
> conda-forge-macos-standard (
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/1078909711):
> [sagelib-9.2.beta12]
>
> /Users/runner/work/sage/sage/.tox/local-conda-forge-macos-standard/local/include/*lin
On Wednesday, September 9, 2020 at 10:11:14 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> by the way, I am not able to pick up Homebrew's python3.8 in the presence
> of python3.7, unless I modify python3's spkg-configure.m4 to exclude
> python3.7 and python3 from the list of Pythons it checks for.
>
>>
>>
On Wednesday, September 9, 2020 at 8:35:10 AM UTC-7, David Coudert wrote:
>
> The traces of fortran 9 (and actually gcc 9) are due
> to .homebrew-build-env. which contains:
>
> for l in "gcc@9/lib/gcc/9"; do
> if [ -d "$HOMEBREW/opt/$l" ]; then
>
On Wednesday, September 9, 2020 at 2:49:19 AM UTC-7, david@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> If I understand well, I’m facing the case (not completely sure):
> homebrew-macos-python3_xcode-gcc_spkg-{minimal,standard}: Various build
> errors (ignore for Sage 9.2)
>
> That is: macOS 10.15.6 with clang
On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 10:21:19 PM UTC-7, Matthias Köppe wrote:
>
> On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 4:25:39 PM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
>> branch. Alternatively, the self-conta
On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 10:21:19 PM UTC-7, Matthias Köppe wrote:
>
> On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 4:25:39 PM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
>> branch. Alternatively, the self-conta
On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 10:21:19 PM UTC-7, Matthias Köppe wrote:
>
> On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 4:25:39 PM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
>> branch. Alternatively, the self-conta
On Sunday, September 6, 2020 at 4:25:39 PM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> 5ec24db181 (tag: 9.2.beta12,
On Thursday, September 3, 2020 at 7:07:44 PM UTC-7, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am failing to build from scratch Sage 9.2 beta11 since beta10 or perhaps
> even earlier beta. My system is macOS 10.15.6 with Xcode 11.7. ...
> $ gcc --version
> Configured with:
;
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 11:50 PM Matthias Köppe
> > wrote:
> >
> > cvxopt build is also known to fail on i386 (
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30052)
> >
> > On Monday, August 17, 2020 at 1:06:45 PM UTC-7, Jaap Spies wrote:
> >>
> >
cvxopt build is also known to fail on i386 (
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30052)
On Monday, August 17, 2020 at 1:06:45 PM UTC-7, Jaap Spies wrote:
>
> On my Raspberry Pi 4 8GB build fails on cvxopt
>
> * package: cvxopt-1.2.3
> last build time: Aug 17 14:34
> log file:
>
On Monday, August 10, 2020 at 3:51:35 PM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
>
> 415221a9a8 (trac/develop, tag:
On Tuesday, August 11, 2020 at 3:12:38 PM UTC-7, Kenji Iohara wrote:
>
> I could compile Sage 9.2.beta 8 on Mac OS.10.15.6 and run sage. Quitting
> sage has evoked no problem…
> But, for ptestlong, it has some errors. I don’t know whether this is
> completely local porblem…
>
These doctest
On Tuesday, August 11, 2020 at 9:04:01 AM UTC-7, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
>
> I do not know how to re-open a closed ticket...
>
One doesn't.
I'd suggest to use https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25363 (simple-prompt)
for the things that need to be prepared on the sage side,
and
Yes, 9.2.beta8 did the overdue update from ipython 5 to 7
in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28197
On Tuesday, August 11, 2020 at 8:48:43 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> it is probably a newer iPython that gives this, nothing Sage-specific it
> seems.
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 4:47 PM
The solution in that thread, using "--simple-prompt", is of course not
support by sage.
There's already a ticket for that: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25363
which needs work
On Tuesday, August 11, 2020 at 8:47:00 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> maybe,
>
>
On Wednesday, July 29, 2020 at 4:37:52 AM UTC-7, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>
> The errors seem to involve Flint. I have Flint 2.6.1 from Homebrew.
>
> Should I
> - uninstall Homebrew's flint and try again?
>
>
Yes please, so that we can get https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30227 done
--
You
Please post logs
On Monday, July 27, 2020 at 4:06:19 PM UTC-7, Kenji Iohara wrote:
>
> On mac OS X.15.6 without gcc@9, I could ompile it.
> Installing gcc@9 with Homebrew, I couldn’t compile arb….
>
> After compilation without gcc@9, making ptestlong, I had the next
> reaction:
>
>
Fixed in #30227, please test
On Sunday, July 26, 2020 at 12:34:30 PM UTC-7, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>
> > Date: 2020-07-26 00:20 UTC
> > From: Volker Braun
> > To: sage-release
> > Subject: Sage 9.2.beta6 released
> >
> > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop"
> >
This will be addressed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30227
On Sunday, July 26, 2020 at 1:46:10 PM UTC-7, Matthias Köppe wrote:
>
> From your log:
> [ 4/517] clang -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -Wunreachable-code
> -fno-common -dynamic -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wa
>From your log:
[ 4/517] clang -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -Wunreachable-code
-fno-common -dynamic -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -isysroot
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX10.14.sdk
-I/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX10.14.sdk/usr/include
Sage does not support gcc/gfortran 10 yet.
See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30067 for a workaround
and https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29456 for the task of adding support
for 10.
On Sunday, July 12, 2020 at 6:26:37 AM UTC-7, Kenji Iohara wrote:
>
> The version of gfortran I use is 10.1.0.
On Friday, June 26, 2020 at 2:36:15 PM UTC-7, Paul Masson wrote:
>
> Any reason Trac 29809 wasn't included in this release? It's blocking other
> tickets and future improvements.
>
My guess is there is no particular reason other than a backlog of other
positive-review tickets.
A possibly related ticket: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28008
On Wednesday, June 17, 2020 at 9:41:43 AM UTC-7, kcrisman wrote:
>
> On Mac OS X 10.11. Upgrading via git pull trac develop and make from
> somewhere in the 9.0 betas, I get a lot of good things, until:
>
> mkdir
On Monday, May 25, 2020 at 4:20:45 AM UTC-7, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
> Hi, can you please try again?
>
Seems to be fixed, thanks!
>
> I made notes here: https://github.com/sagemath/website/issues/194
>
> This has nothing to do with files.sagemath.org, because this list is
> served directly
On Sunday, May 24, 2020 at 10:57:44 PM UTC-7, Matthias Köppe wrote:
>
> I believe this is not due to changes in Sage but is caused by a server
> misconfiguration on files.sagemath.org.
>
>
With python2 on macOS:
>>> from sage_bootstrap.compat import urllib, urlparse
I believe this is not due to changes in Sage but is caused by a server
misconfiguration on files.sagemath.org.
Matthias
On Friday, May 22, 2020 at 6:54:01 PM UTC-7, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>
>> Justin
>>
>> $ make -j6 build/make/Makefile --stop
>> ./bootstrap -d
>> rm -rf config configure
On Saturday, May 23, 2020 at 1:39:25 PM UTC-7, Paul Masson wrote:
>
> Tried building an upgraded branch on macOS 10.15.4 (Catalina). Sage won't
> start with an error I've not seen before. Log attached.
>
> FYI this was a rather long build process. How many packages were updated?
>
Should I just
build/sage_bootstrap/download/mirror_list.py already uses a py2/py3
compatibility module for urllib:
see build/sage_bootstrap/compat/__init__.py
On Saturday, May 23, 2020 at 4:58:22 PM UTC-7, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, May 23, 2020 at 2:44:04 PM UTC-4, Matthias
For debugging this, please note that this is executed using
build/bin/sage-system-python, which is not necessarily the same as ./sage
-python.
On Saturday, May 23, 2020 at 9:44:53 AM UTC-7, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> > CRITICAL [mirror_list|_load:91]: Downloaded mirror list has syntax
>> error:
On Friday, May 22, 2020 at 6:54:01 PM UTC-7, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>
>> Justin
>>
>> $ make -j6 build/make/Makefile --stop
>> ./bootstrap -d
>> rm -rf config configure build/make/Makefile-auto.in
>> rm -f src/doc/en/installation/*.txt
>> src/doc/bootstrap:48: installing
37分09秒 UTC+2 Matthias Köppe:
>>
>> Could you also send the top-level config.log?
>>
>> On Friday, May 22, 2020 at 4:17:29 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>>
>>> [pynac-0.7.26.sage-2020-04-03] Please email sage-devel (
>>> http://groups.google.com/grou
Could you also send the top-level config.log?
On Friday, May 22, 2020 at 4:17:29 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> [pynac-0.7.26.sage-2020-04-03] Please email sage-devel (
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel)
>
> [pynac-0.7.26.sage-2020-04-03] explaining the problem and including the
>
On Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 1:35:45 PM UTC-7, kcrisman wrote:
>
> Anyway, I'd like to (if possible) build one last py2 binary that way for
> the mirrors
>
+1. We should definitely have py2 binaries of 9.1.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On Wednesday, May 20, 2020 at 3:53:54 PM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-9.1. As always, you can
> get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively,
> the self-contained source tarball is at
>
On Wednesday, May 20, 2020 at 3:53:54 PM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-9.1. As always, you can
> get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively,
> the self-contained source tarball is at
>
On Wednesday, May 13, 2020 at 3:41:44 PM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> 765c5cb3e2 (trac/develop, tag:
On Thursday, May 14, 2020 at 1:02:38 PM UTC-7, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
>
> On Debian testing, upgrading from 9.1.rc3 fails early on longsl23 not
> beaing resent (I have libgsl25).
>
> Is there a way to avoid rebuilding from scratch (make distclean...) ?
>
>
It should suffice to uninstall the
201 - 300 of 354 matches
Mail list logo
