Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

> On Aug 18, 2020, at 16:01 , Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. > Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html Built from a fresh clone of 9.2.b9 on macOS 10.14.6

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 8:02 PM Maxime Bombar wrote: > > On 8/20/20 5:05 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > segfaults and aborts you get from tests are kind of worrying. Could it > > be that you have "rogue" libraries in /usr/local, which get picked up > > instead of system ones? > > > > Perhaps, post

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

On 8/20/20 5:05 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > segfaults and aborts you get from tests are kind of worrying. Could it > be that you have "rogue" libraries in /usr/local, which get picked up > instead of system ones? > > Perhaps, post the main config.log > Hi, I upgraded to beta10, and every segfault

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

> On Aug 18, 2020, at 16:01, Volker Braun wrote: > > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. > Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at > http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html Built from fresh clones of the 9.2.b8 branch, on two

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

segfaults and aborts you get from tests are kind of worrying. Could it be that you have "rogue" libraries in /usr/local, which get picked up instead of system ones? Perhaps, post the main config.log On Thu, 20 Aug 2020, 16:01 Maxime Bombar, wrote: > On 8/20/20 4:24 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

On 8/20/20 4:24 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > It would be good to know which of these still fail if you run them > separately. I have exactly the same result by running them separately. I tried running those tests with sage9.1, and both `src/sage/rings/real_arb.pyx` and

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

It would be good to know which of these still fail if you run them separately. On Thu, 20 Aug 2020, 15:19 Maxime Bombar, wrote: > On 8/20/20 11:58 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 2:57 PM Maxime Bombar > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On a fresh install from sources on Debian

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

On 8/20/20 11:58 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 2:57 PM Maxime Bombar wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On a fresh install from sources on Debian Sid build and documentation >> are ok, but tests sometimes fail : >> >> make: *** [Makefile:190: ptestlong] Error 17 > More details please -

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 2:57 PM Maxime Bombar wrote: > > Hi, > > On a fresh install from sources on Debian Sid build and documentation > are ok, but tests sometimes fail : > > make: *** [Makefile:190: ptestlong] Error 17 More details please - which tests have failed? (normally there should be a

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

It is a fresh build. > 2020/08/20 9:33、David Coudert のメール: > > was it incremental build (and from which beta) or fresh build ? > > >> Le 20 août 2020 à 02:55, Kenji Iohara > > a écrit : >> >> I have Mac OS X.15.6. I could compile it with no problem, >> but

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

was it incremental build (and from which beta) or fresh build ? > Le 20 août 2020 à 02:55, Kenji Iohara a écrit : > > I have Mac OS X.15.6. I could compile it with no problem, > but I had some errors running ptestlong > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

Hi, On a fresh install from sources on Debian Sid build and documentation are ok, but tests sometimes fail : make: *** [Makefile:190: ptestlong] Error 17 -- MB. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 11:07 AM David Coudert wrote: > > incremental upgrade from 9.2.beta8 on macOS 10.14.6 > - build OK > - docbuild OK > > however, a non blocking error with sagetex: > > [sagetex-3.4] Successfully built sagetex > [sagetex-3.4] Installing collected packages: sagetex >

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

incremental upgrade from 9.2.beta8 on macOS 10.14.6 - build OK - docbuild OK however, a non blocking error with sagetex: [sagetex-3.4] Successfully built sagetex [sagetex-3.4] Installing collected packages: sagetex [sagetex-3.4] Created temporary directory:

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta9 released

On my Ubuntu 20/04, migrating from 9.2 beta 8 to beta 9: - compilation: no problem - make ptestlong -- All tests passed! -- t.d. Le 19/08/2020 à 01:01, Volker