Re: [sage-release] 6.2.beta8 problem

2014-04-17 Thread leif
Jeroen Demeyer wrote: On 2014-04-17 16:57, John Cremona wrote: In fact ot make sure that libraries linked to NTL gets rebuilt you should run "SAGE_UPGRADING=yes make". But surely if the dependencies are correctly specified this should not be necessary? Unfortunately, that's not the case. Sage

Re: [sage-release] 6.2.beta8 problem

2014-04-17 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2014-04-17 16:57, John Cremona wrote: In fact ot make sure that libraries linked to NTL gets rebuilt you should run "SAGE_UPGRADING=yes make". But surely if the dependencies are correctly specified this should not be necessary? Unfortunately, that's not the case. Sage no longer makes a diffe

Re: [sage-release] 6.2.beta8 problem

2014-04-17 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Thursday, April 17, 2014 4:57:03 PM UTC+2, John Cremona wrote: > > On 17 April 2014 07:51, Jean-Pierre Flori > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thursday, April 17, 2014 4:44:40 PM UTC+2, Peter Bruin wrote: > >> > >> Hello John, > >> > >> I posted a reply but it doesn't seem to have appeared. Y

Re: [sage-release] 6.2.beta8 problem

2014-04-17 Thread John Cremona
On 17 April 2014 07:51, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > On Thursday, April 17, 2014 4:44:40 PM UTC+2, Peter Bruin wrote: >> >> Hello John, >> >> I posted a reply but it doesn't seem to have appeared. You can also try >> >> sage -f eclib >> sage -f linbox >> sage -f singular >> > Good idea. I'll t

Re: [sage-release] 6.2.beta8 problem

2014-04-17 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Thursday, April 17, 2014 4:44:40 PM UTC+2, Peter Bruin wrote: > > Hello John, > > I posted a reply but it doesn't seem to have appeared. You can also try > > sage -f eclib > sage -f linbox > sage -f singular > > Good idea. In fact ot make sure that libraries linked to NTL gets rebuilt you sh

[sage-release] Re: 6.2.beta8 problem

2014-04-17 Thread Peter Bruin
Op donderdag 17 april 2014 11:54:32 UTC+1 schreef John Cremona: > This is a different problem to the one I reported on the other > > sage-release thread. On my laptop (ubuntu 12.04) I had a working > > build of a previous beta, I think beta6. I pulled from trac/develop > > and ran a make. Her

Re: [sage-release] 6.2.beta8 problem

2014-04-17 Thread Peter Bruin
Hello John, I posted a reply but it doesn't seem to have appeared. You can also try sage -f eclib sage -f linbox sage -f singular Peter Op donderdag 17 april 2014 15:32:03 UTC+1 schreef John Cremona: > > On 17 April 2014 05:40, leif > wrote: > > leif wrote: > >> > >> Francois Bissey wrote:

Re: [sage-release] 6.2.beta8 problem

2014-04-17 Thread John Cremona
On 17 April 2014 05:40, leif wrote: > leif wrote: >> >> Francois Bissey wrote: >>> >>> sage/matrix/matrix_mpolynomial_dense.so >>> that's who. In this case it hasn't been rebuild after ntl's upgrade. >> >> >> Weird, since Jeroen made every extension module also depend on >> src/setup.py, and that

Re: [sage-release] 6.2.beta8 problem

2014-04-17 Thread leif
leif wrote: Francois Bissey wrote: sage/matrix/matrix_mpolynomial_dense.so that's who. In this case it hasn't been rebuild after ntl's upgrade. Weird, since Jeroen made every extension module also depend on src/setup.py, and that definitely changed... Jean-Pierre is probably right except th

[sage-release] Re: Sage-6.1.1 Virtual Appliance

2014-04-17 Thread kcrisman
Awesome, thanks V and H! On Thursday, April 17, 2014 4:18:15 AM UTC-4, Harald Schilly wrote: > > thank's! file is on its way around the world ;-) > > h > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Volker Braun > > > wrote: > > I've updated the scripts for generating the virtual appliance, its now >

Re: [sage-release] 6.2.beta8 problem

2014-04-17 Thread leif
Francois Bissey wrote: sage/matrix/matrix_mpolynomial_dense.so that's who. In this case it hasn't been rebuild after ntl's upgrade. Weird, since Jeroen made every extension module also depend on src/setup.py, and that definitely changed... Jean-Pierre is probably right except that this tic

Re: [sage-release] 6.2.beta8 problem

2014-04-17 Thread Francois Bissey
sage/matrix/matrix_mpolynomial_dense.so that's who. In this case it hasn't been rebuild after nt.'s upgrade, and Jean-Pierre is probably right except that this ticket is in beta8 (I think). You probably need a bit of make distclean && make François On 17/04/2014, at 22:54, John Cremona wrote:

[sage-release] Re: 6.2.beta8 problem

2014-04-17 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Thursday, April 17, 2014 12:54:32 PM UTC+2, John Cremona wrote: > > This is a different problem to the one I reported on the other > sage-release thread. On my laptop (ubuntu 12.04) I had a working > build of a previous beta, I think beta6. I pulled from trac/develop > and ran a make. He

[sage-release] 6.2.beta8 problem

2014-04-17 Thread John Cremona
This is a different problem to the one I reported on the other sage-release thread. On my laptop (ubuntu 12.04) I had a working build of a previous beta, I think beta6. I pulled from trac/develop and ran a make. Here's the error message: [ -f local/etc/sage-started.txt ] || local/bin/sage-star

[sage-release] Re: Sage-6.1.1 Virtual Appliance

2014-04-17 Thread Harald Schilly
thank's! file is on its way around the world ;-) h On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > I've updated the scripts for generating the virtual appliance, its now based > on CentOS 6 which should be less maintenance effort... Updated VM is here: > > http://boxen.math.washington.ed