Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.5.beta2 released

2014-12-05 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Dec 5, 2014, at 20:33 , kcrisman wrote: > >> >> Built from the tarball, w/o problems. All tests ('ptestlong') passed. >> OS X, 10.6.8 (Dual 6-core Xeons) and 10.10.1 (Quad-core Core i7). >> > > If you were able to make some 10.6 binaries for us, that would be awesome. > I assume you ha

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.4.1 released

2014-12-05 Thread Francois Bissey
Don’t remember where I got the C++11 from but Volker is correct according to the gcc folks themselves: https://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html > On 6/12/2014, at 17:33, kcrisman wrote: > > > > The C++ compiler needs some elements of C++11. > > In theory everything should work with a C+

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.4.1 released

2014-12-05 Thread kcrisman
> > The C++ compiler needs some elements of C++11. > > > In theory everything should work with a C++98 compiler only. But it needs > to not bail out when encountering options to turn off warnings that it > doesn't understand. Really, if you don't know what narrowing is then > "-Wno-narrowing"

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.5.beta2 released

2014-12-05 Thread kcrisman
> > Built from the tarball, w/o problems. All tests ('ptestlong') passed. > OS X, 10.6.8 (Dual 6-core Xeons) and 10.10.1 (Quad-core Core i7). > If you were able to make some 10.6 binaries for us, that would be awesome. I assume you have an older Xcode as well? -- You received this message

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.5.beta2 released

2014-12-05 Thread Francois Bissey
Rebuilding everything serial is not necessary. You can change the MAKE command and then do ./sage -f pkgX it will work perfectly. In your case my suspicion is that it will be broken until local/lib/pkgconfig/freetype2.pc is fixed. François > On 6/12/2014, at 09:07, Emmanuel Charpentier > wrote

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.5.beta2 released

2014-12-05 Thread Ivan Andrus
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Emmanuel Charpentier < emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com> wrote: > Le jeudi 4 décembre 2014 20:48:20 UTC+1, Volker Braun a écrit : >> >> As usual, get the "develop" git branch or the self-contained tarball at >> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/pub/sage-6.

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.5.beta2 released

2014-12-05 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote: > > On Dec 4, 2014, at 11:48 , Volker Braun wrote: > >> As usual, get the "develop" git branch or the self-contained tarball >> at http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/pub/sage-6.5.beta2.tar.gz > > Built from the tarball, w/o proble

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.5.beta2 released

2014-12-05 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Le vendredi 5 décembre 2014 20:56:12 UTC+1, François a écrit : > > Could please people submitting logs generate them serially “-j1”. > The following line probably explains a lot of things: > /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99 > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/usr/local/sage-6

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.5.beta2 released

2014-12-05 Thread Francois Bissey
Could please people submitting logs generate them serially “-j1”. The following line probably explains a lot of things: /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/usr/local/sage-6.4/local/include/libpng12 -I/usr/local/sage-6.3/local/include/freetype2 -

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.5.beta1 released

2014-12-05 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Friday, December 5, 2014 7:23:52 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote: > > We need a different tarball name or our caching will break. If upstream > doesn't rename it then you have to. > > Ok, I'll suggest to add p1 to the version number. And if needed will do it for Sage only. -- You received thi

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.5.beta1 released

2014-12-05 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Friday, December 5, 2014 7:44:33 PM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > > On Friday, December 5, 2014 7:06:48 PM UTC+1, Johan S. R. Nielsen wrote: >> >> >> As long as the forced rebuild with the new tarball works there is nothing >>> to worry about. >>> Note that I meant run from "$SAGE_ROO

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.5.beta1 released

2014-12-05 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Friday, December 5, 2014 7:06:48 PM UTC+1, Johan S. R. Nielsen wrote: > > > As long as the forced rebuild with the new tarball works there is nothing >> to worry about. >> Note that I meant run from "$SAGE_ROOT" the "sage" script with "-sh >> sage-fix-pkg-checksums" options and not go to "$S

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.5.beta1 released

2014-12-05 Thread Volker Braun
We need a different tarball name or our caching will break. If upstream doesn't rename it then you have to. On Friday, December 5, 2014 5:23:56 PM UTC, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > > On Friday, December 5, 2014 5:23:27 PM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: >> >> In fact there has been some failu

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.5.beta1 released

2014-12-05 Thread Johan S. R. Nielsen
> As long as the forced rebuild with the new tarball works there is nothing > to worry about. > Note that I meant run from "$SAGE_ROOT" the "sage" script with "-sh > sage-fix-pkg-checksums" options and not go to "$SAGE_ROOT/sage" and then > run "sh sage-fix-pkg-checksums". > Ah, you meant "./

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.5.beta1 released

2014-12-05 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Friday, December 5, 2014 6:38:37 PM UTC+1, Johan S. R. Nielsen wrote: > > On Friday, December 5, 2014 6:23:56 PM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: >> >> François and Johan, could you try the tarball at: >> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jpflori/iml-1.0.4/iml-1.0.4.tar.bz2 >> which include

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.5.beta1 released

2014-12-05 Thread Johan S. R. Nielsen
On Friday, December 5, 2014 6:23:56 PM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > François and Johan, could you try the tarball at: > http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jpflori/iml-1.0.4/iml-1.0.4.tar.bz2 > which includes the netlib cblas.h as intended. > > Please run "./sage -sh sage-fix-pkg-checksums

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.5.beta1 released

2014-12-05 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Friday, December 5, 2014 5:23:27 PM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > In fact there has been some failure from me when upstream updated IML. > > I somehow failed to leave the netlib cblas.h (which should get picked up > if nothing else is found) in the tarball :( > In the README there is :

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.5.beta1 released

2014-12-05 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
In fact there has been some failure from me when upstream updated IML. I somehow failed to leave the netlib cblas.h (which should get picked up if nothing else is found) in the tarball :( In the README there is : * add netlib cblas.h header as fallback header On Friday, December 5, 2014 1:06:28

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.5.beta1 released

2014-12-05 Thread Johan S. R. Nielsen
> Thanks for looking into this yourself. > Sure, I was the one without a functioning Sage :-D I had a quick look at your config.log but it is exceptionally empty as far > as the failure is concerned and I had no time to look at IML autotool stuff > yet. > > Note that before we badly hacked IML

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.5.beta1 released

2014-12-05 Thread Francois Bissey
Note that for OS X where the headers are missing I copied headers in the source. IML is the only package I can think of requiring cblas.h we could just always copy the header I don’t know how it would hurt. François > On 6/12/2014, at 00:55, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > > On Friday, Decembe

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.5.beta1 released

2014-12-05 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Friday, December 5, 2014 12:35:24 PM UTC+1, Johan S. R. Nielsen wrote: > > I seem to have solved it: compilation halted when it wasn't able to find > the ATLAS header files. So I extracted the header files from > upstream/atlas-3.10.0.tar.bz2/ATLAS/include to some folder and set the > envir

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.5.beta1 released

2014-12-05 Thread Johan S. R. Nielsen
I seem to have solved it: compilation halted when it wasn't able to find the ATLAS header files. So I extracted the header files from upstream/atlas-3.10.0.tar.bz2/ATLAS/include to some folder and set the environment variable ATLAS_HEADER_PATH to this path. Then compilation succeeded. It's pos

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.4.1 released

2014-12-05 Thread Volker Braun
On Friday, December 5, 2014 10:40:46 AM UTC, François wrote: > > The C++ compiler needs some elements of C++11. In theory everything should work with a C++98 compiler only. But it needs to not bail out when encountering options to turn off warnings that it doesn't understand. Really, if you don

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.4.1 released

2014-12-05 Thread Francois Bissey
99% sure. The C++ compiler needs some elements of C++11. I am fairly sure that nothing below 4.2 will build gcc 4.9, but I think the barrier is either 4.5 or 4.6. I would to check but I think I build it with 4.6 (on AIX 5.3). François > On 5/12/2014, at 22:58, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2014-1

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.4.1 released

2014-12-05 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2014-12-04 21:03, François Bissey wrote: gcc 4.0.1 is definitely too old to build 4.9.x. Are you sure about this statement or are you just guessing? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop rec

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.5.beta2 released

2014-12-05 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2014-12-05, Justin C. Walker wrote: > > On Dec 4, 2014, at 11:48 , Volker Braun wrote: > >> As usual, get the "develop" git branch or the self-contained tarball >> at http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/pub/sage-6.5.beta2.tar.gz > > Built from the tarball, w/o problems. All tests ('