Re: [sage-release] 12 binaries for Debian and Ubuntu (32 and 64 bits)

Hi The PPA for 14.04 64bit is now updated. I am currently in Tanzania (severe unannounced power outages) and working via South Africa (severe announced power outages) but will, when I am back in 2 weeks, start work on adding 32bit and other versions of Ubuntu to the PPA. In the meantime I will u

Re: [sage-release] Multiple Sage 6.6 binaries for Ubuntu 14.04 ?

The first one has been built by the same buildbot as with the previous binaries (hence, this one is a bit more "official") and the second one does from from france. I don't think there is any significant difference. -- harald On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > Hi, > > On

[sage-release] Multiple Sage 6.6 binaries for Ubuntu 14.04 ?

Hi, On the Linux download pages for Sage 6.6 binaries, e.g. http://files.sagemath.org/linux/64bit/index.html there are two tar files for Ubuntu 14.04: *- sage-6.6-x86_64-Linux-Ubuntu_14.04_x86_64.tar.gz* (1328 MB) *- Ubuntu_14.04_LTS_sage-6.6-x86_64-Linux.tar.lrz* (745 MB) Is there any diffe

Re: [sage-release] sage releases -> DOI number?

> Task force. "The Sage guys" Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send em

Re: [sage-release] sage releases -> DOI number?

On 04/24/2015 10:43 AM, Harald Schilly wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Daniel Krenn wrote: >> And, the wiki page >> >> http://wiki.sagemath.org/Publications_using_SAGE >> >> should be updated: > > yes, it should. I also don't know how to call the authors: "SageMath > Developers", "...

Re: [sage-release] Re: sage releases -> DOI number?

> The new feature, oops, bug is the show() command in 6.6 . Simply don't > render correctly the output. The same command and examples still working in > version 6.5. I've used a fresh Ubuntu and Fedora latest installation. A related discussion on #18289: http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18289 Nath

Re: [sage-release] Re: sage releases -> DOI number?

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > The Sage source tarball should contain all tarballs for standard packages in > upstream/. If this is not the case, that's a bug. yes, but this isn't the sage source tarball, hence the ambiguity. -- h -- You received this message because

Re: [sage-release] sage releases -> DOI number?

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Daniel Krenn wrote: > Isn't "SageMath Mathematical Software System 6.6" an even better title, > since it contains "SageMath", which should occur "everywhere"? Back in that re-naming thread, I did argue that the duplicate "Math Math" in the long title is a bit sill

Re: [sage-release] Re: sage releases -> DOI number?

The new feature, oops, bug is the show() command in 6.6 . Simply don't render correctly the output. The same command and examples still working in version 6.5. I've used a fresh Ubuntu and Fedora latest installation. On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 5:30 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2015-04-23 21:47, E

Re: [sage-release] Re: sage releases -> DOI number?

On 2015-04-23 21:47, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: Or, more precisely, this tarball + any standard package tarball installed in upstream/ The Sage source tarball should contain all tarballs for standard packages in upstream/. If this is not the case, that's a bug. Jeroen. -- You received this

Re: [sage-release] sage releases -> DOI number?

Am 2015-04-23 um 13:37 schrieb William Stein: > On Thursday, April 23, 2015, Harald Schilly > wrote: > LaTeX: > > @misc{w_a_stein_et_al_2015_17093, > author = {W. A. Stein et al.} > title= {SageMath 6.6}, > month= ap